Channel
@ourlastmessage
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
102subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001833395978 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ourlastmessage |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ourlastmessage |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @LastADHMessage/44228 Mar 2024, 22:24 UTC | @ourlastmessage/442 · this entry28 Mar 2024, 22:24 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ourlastmessage/452 · this entry10 Apr 2024, 06:01 UTC | @LastADHMessage/45210 Apr 2024, 06:01 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @LastADHMessage/45410 Apr 2024, 06:10 UTC | @ourlastmessage/454 · this entry10 Apr 2024, 06:10 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ourlastmessage/455 · this entry10 Apr 2024, 06:15 UTC | @LastADHMessage/45510 Apr 2024, 06:15 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @LastADHMessage/45610 Apr 2024, 06:20 UTC | @ourlastmessage/456 · this entry10 Apr 2024, 06:20 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @LastADHMessage/45710 Apr 2024, 06:25 UTC | @ourlastmessage/457 · this entry10 Apr 2024, 06:25 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @LastADHMessage | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (8–2) |
| @LastMessageNatureFreaks | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @LastMessageNatureFreaks (8–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 March 2024 to 6 March 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @LastMessageNatureFreaks. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:31 | 102 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:07 | 103 | +2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 05:37 | 101 | -1 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 06:17 | 102 | -1 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 14:38 | 103 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 106 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 105 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 107 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 107 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
If you are reading this scheduled message, means we are now representing Telegram in paradise, but still here too. We will share a message we wrote almost 1 year ago, that we never changed in the last time. We released tons of updated messages to our family. It's their decision if they want to share worldwide such messages or not. Our new update are our channels! No matter what, we will continue to fight for facts, …
Remember to scroll to the top, or https://t.me/ourlastmessage/438 Again, this is an old message without edits, new messages are shared just with our family and maybe in future on newspapers / tv. This was our last breath, fighting for things that really matter. We NEVER closed our eyes with bullshit and discrimination. As we announced previously, we are happy to be part of the most important two centuries and we re…
PS: all our 1000+ channels on Telegram will work until Facebook, Google, Telegram, Mastercard, etc. will deactivate it for inactivity or similar reasons, or the bots will stop to work. This goodbye message will be available only on Telegram, even if we are present, tracking and using social networks like no one other in the world. Or better “we were”, but probably even for the next 10+ years no one will be able to re…
Last point: if Pavel Durov is seeing this message, we hope he will not delete it. We give Pavel Durov full permission to use our empty channels for other goals, because there was not enough time to launch all our projects, and to be honest we wanted to create even more projects. We give Pavel Durov the permission to contact governments, so they can continue to use our government channels, in case their are interested…
10) A message to Elon Musk: We really hope that you are able to fix your fused head in the future. We respect you as person able to store so many informations in your brain so easily like no one (or just few) are able to do and the ability to create things, but this is still not enough to make a person good. Now with Twitter you are showing again that you are acting just based on money, giving a shit to other things.…
8) In case our story reach newspapers, don’t write bullshit about that, like some of you are mostly doing (because until now we acted as journalists in multiple languages too and we kept track of what your are doing). First at all you probably don’t know us at all. If this is the case, we already demonstrated how shitty you are searching medias online! We already noticed your shitty way to search informations during …
4) We hope that AI and humanoid will not doing what in various games, tv shows or movies happened. Such things can be useful in some points, helping for example people with disabilities, but should not replace the humanity at all. People are starting to compare them to the machine used in the industries, which in reality are not comparable at all. Almost all jobs could be replaced by AI and humanoids and what they ar…
Hello everyone, if you are reading this scheduled message means we already left this planet. We have a lot to say in our last message, so we hope you can take a bit time to read the reasons behind that, what we wish from people in the future, our messages to Elon Musk, Pavel Durov, journalists, etc. Since years we had the wish to do that and we delayed it last year too, due to the Ukraine - Russia situation. We will …
This is a message we wrote almost 1 years ago. We haven't changed it at all and we haven't wrote any new additional infos. Our projects are already the new update. We wrote different new personal messages, that maybe will be shared in future worldwide.
It's time to be a better world!
Dear Future Generations, WE ARE SORRY! https://t.me/WorldWar3Facts/26 https://t.me/WeAreTheFutureTelegram/6 🖇🌍 https://t.me/addlist/PnM6poGtTtwwMzcx
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ourlastmessage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ourlastmessage” (@ourlastmessage), 102 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ourlastmessage.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.