Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Остеопрактика - остеопатия, биодинамика, массаж

Channel

Остеопрактика - остеопатия, биодинамика, массаж

@osteopractika_school

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,793subscribers

+22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001305279501
TypeChannel
Username@osteopractika_school
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/osteopractika_school

Growth

12,77112,79412,782.57 August 2026 — 12,771 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,771 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,774 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,777 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,781 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,789 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,790 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,794 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,793 subscribers12,7937 August 202615 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,768–12,797 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 15:5812,793-1
14 Aug 2026, 05:0812,794+4
12 Aug 2026, 23:3512,790+1
12 Aug 2026, 00:1212,789+8
10 Aug 2026, 20:4312,781+4
9 Aug 2026, 20:1212,777+3
8 Aug 2026, 01:3312,774+3
7 Aug 2026, 10:0012,771no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:5412,771first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 12,793 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,310
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 35 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held35 (28 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total45,722
Reactions total611
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

611 reactions across 31 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
32653.4%
👍17628.8%
🔥6310.3%
🙏294.75%
👏101.64%
💯40.655%
🤔30.491%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 611reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC414 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Основной веной, собирающей кровь от органов и тканей головы и шеи, служит внутренняя яремная вена (v. jugularis interna), образующаяся на уровне яремного отверстия, где в нее переходит сигмовидный синус. У начала внутренней яремной вены имеется расширение - верхняя луковица внутренней яремной вены. На шее внутренняя яремная вена идет вначале позади общей сонной артерии, затем - латеральнее и кпереди от нее. Рядом с в

6👍2🙏1

14 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC828 views37 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Любое избыточное сжатие черепа, удерживаемое со времени родов, может зажать или даже повредить ниже лежащую нервную ткань. Церебральный паралич возникает по многим причинам. Как считает доктор Джон Апледжер, к таким причинам относятся «ненормальное натяжение твердой мозговой оболочки и/или защемление некоторых швов свода черепа». Такое защемление часто касается коронарного шва, расположенного в верхней части головы м

👍2314

13 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC922 views23 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Тройничный нерв — V пара черепных нервов, смешанного типа, содержит чувствительные и двигательные ядра и волокна, выходит сбоку от варолиевого моста, проникает под твердую мозговую оболочку дна средней черепной ямки и ложится на верхнюю поверхность пирамиды височной кости у ее верхушки. Своё название получил вследствие того, что чувствительная часть на выходе из тройничного узла разделяется на 3 основные ветви: верх

19👍2🙏2

12 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,020 views30 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Это тонкая мышечная пластина, которая выстилает зону декольте от второго ребра и выше, обхватывает шею и накрывает нижнюю часть лица, по бокам доставая до ушей. Она относится к мимическим мышцам и является самой крупной из них. При этом, в отличие от многих мышц, она довольно тонкая, практически лишённая жировой прослойки и сальных желез, из-за чего сильно «сохнет» и быстрее других утрачивает эластичность. Она не со

22👏7👍1

11 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC≈1,190 views22 reactionsread 15 August 2026

👉🏻Сужение глазницы (по Э. Гихин) ▶️Показание. Восстановить размер глазничной полости. . ▶️Положение пациента - Лежа на спине, удобно, расслабившись. ▶️Положение оператора - Сидя у головы пациента, со стороны противоположной от повреждения. Точки контакта I-й палец краниально расположенной руки располагается на глазничном крае лобной кости. Другие пальцы, не играющие роли в этой технике, простираются свободно на чере

👍118🤔3

11 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC≈1,030 views6 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥51

10 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,480 views61 reactionsread 15 August 2026

"Кесарево сечение". Д.Е. Апледжер. Посмотрим, что будет, если этот естественный процесс полностью исключен, и роды происходят через кесарево сечение. Не происходят моделирование черепа, спинальной манипуляции и растяжения всего тела с массажем. Часто внутриутробное давление бывает значительно большим, чем давление вне матки. Это подтверждается каждый раз при рассечении скальпелем, когда амниотическая жидкость бьет ге

44👍9💯4🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @osteopractika_school. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 265,673 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Алесь Улищенко | Врач-остеопат, канд. мед. наук | Автор фейспластики
@dr_ales · 470,549
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Владимир Животов - остеопат
@zhivotovvladimir · 100,061
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Остеопрактика - остеопатия, биодинамика, массаж” (@osteopractika_school), 12,793 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/osteopractika_school.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.