Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Океан безвременья

Channel

Океан безвременья

@oceantugoyrvoti

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,960subscribers

+67 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002452253202
TypeChannel
Username@oceantugoyrvoti
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/oceantugoyrvoti

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8931,9641,928.55 August 2026 — 1,893 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,893 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,899 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,896 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,898 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,906 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,903 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,902 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,926 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,924 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,927 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,921 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,942 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,963 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,964 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,960 subscribers1,9605 August 202618 September 2026
16 measurements spanning 44 days, net +67. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,882–1,975 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 22:401,960-4
14 Sept 2026, 10:191,964+1
10 Sept 2026, 22:171,963+21
6 Sept 2026, 00:191,942+21
2 Sept 2026, 06:361,921-6
30 Aug 2026, 16:421,927+3
27 Aug 2026, 21:531,924-2
25 Aug 2026, 08:271,926+24
22 Aug 2026, 01:371,902-1
18 Aug 2026, 15:251,903-3
15 Aug 2026, 17:571,906+8
12 Aug 2026, 17:081,898+2
9 Aug 2026, 16:341,896-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:011,899+6
6 Aug 2026, 06:361,893no change
5 Aug 2026, 19:591,893first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 28 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 28s
Average length
2m 28s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

258 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3814.7%
💅3614.0%
😭3413.2%
💯3011.6%
😁2710.5%
custom 5465296388956890221228.53%
🤣218.14%
🌚145.43%
💔135.04%
🔥103.88%
🙏83.10%
custom 539113376702268114541.55%
🥰10.388%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 509 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 28 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @oceantugoyrvoti. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC106 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

2014: Весёлый молочник 2026: Грустный молочник

🤣2💔1😭1

7 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC187 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

а что если электрик был на самом деле мифическим существом и пытался проверить режиссёра колобка (испытать его), но тот не справился с заданием, выставив своё невежество и гордыню?

😁8💯4🥰1

6 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC262 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @koyechto_dailyPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🙏4💅1

6 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC282 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Что за адская духота на улице? Даже 5 минут находиться в этом пекле невозможно, ВОЗМУТИТЕЛЬНО!!!

💯8🌚7

6 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC278 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @soabcdPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😁6

6 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC478 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

если бы Егор Галенко и Леонид Сквирский были одним человеком:

🤣8

6 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC309 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bogemasranaya

Ой-ой-ой, Колобочек, как же ты провалился в прокате? Что же я скажу Минкульту?

🤣111

6 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC339 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @imnomimalone

А вот института репутации нет и не будет у нас. Далеко ходить не будем - у нас известные медиаменеджеры поддерживают порой довольно аморальных людей и пиздаболов. Какая им польза от такой бездарной растраты эмпатии - загадка

😭9

6 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC369 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ладно, если вы выдержите этот лютый кринж и слэй, можете оставаться.

4

6 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC372 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Все, кто подписался на меня после отмены Колобка, – разочаруются.

😁132

5 Aug 2026, 21:57 UTC468 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

мне нужны их костюмы на хэллоуин 🥺

11

5 Aug 2026, 21:22 UTC≈2,500 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ПОЯВИЛАСЬ!! ПОЯВИЛАСЬ!! ПОЯВИЛАСЬ!!

🔥10🙏4💅2custom 53911337670226811452

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @oceantugoyrvoti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Океан безвременья” (@oceantugoyrvoti), 1,960 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oceantugoyrvoti.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.