Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

РАТСХОФ город-сад

@rathshof

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

464subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001983131539
TypeChannel
Username@rathshof
DescriptionСообщество горожан для развития исторического района Калининграда и комфортной жизни в нём.
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/rathshof

Growth

4647 Aug 2026, 16:43 — 464 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:48 — 464 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:438 Aug 2026, 04:48
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 463–465 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 04:48464no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:43464first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.6%
avg views ÷ 464 subscribers
Avg views / post
221
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held9 (8 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,324
Reactions total142
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
566
Videos
10
Links
92

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

252 reactions across 9 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7228.6%
👍5220.6%
💯3413.5%
🤬2710.7%
💔197.54%
🔥114.37%
😭114.37%
🥰62.38%
❤‍🔥51.98%
🤷51.98%
👎20.794%
👏20.794%
👻20.794%
🥴20.794%
😢10.397%
🙈10.397%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 252reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC107 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ruin_keepersPhoto

Приглашаем вновь удивляться и восторгаться! Мы реконструировали первоначальный вид Евангелической кирхи Христа в Ратсхофе, знаменитый клуб «Вагонка»! 🤩 Храм в Ратсхофе начал проектировать архитектор Курт Фрик в 1932 году, а строительство велось в 1936–1937 годы. Так описывает кирху известный историк архитектуры нашего города Бальдур Кёстер: «Кирха Христа — последнее религиозное сооружение, которое возвели немцы в

13🔥1😢1

30 Jul 2026, 06:13 UTC221 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ничего необычного. Просто аист на крыше восьмиэтажки на Вагонке.

31🥰6👻2❤‍🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 18:01 UTC226 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сложно порой понять, что движет людьми. Если не донесённую до урны банку можно объяснить ленью (хотя расстояние всего 10 метров), то вырванные с корнем и оставленные там же растения логике не поддаются. На фото городская клумба на перекрёстке Победы и Станочной, созданная жителями на месте замусоренного пустыря.

🤬27💔9🤷5🥴2🙈1

16 Jul 2026, 19:42 UTC335 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @urbanistikastudy

Снос на Правой набережной: разбор из позиции модератора-урбаниста (часть 2): Теперь по субъектам — кто чего хотел и чего не мог: Бизнес (АО «КМЗ» / «Русский хлеб»). Основной вид деятельности КМЗ — аренда и управление недвижимостью: здание для него — обременённый актив. Содержать дорого (версия предприятия — аварийность), капитализировать не умеет, символическую ценность не считывает. Ключевой дефицит — не злой умысе

👍15🔥3👎2💯2

16 Jul 2026, 19:42 UTC238 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @urbanistikastudyPhoto

Снос на Правой набережной: разбор из позиции модератора-урбаниста (часть 1): Волна гнева и бойкот — понятная реакция горожан на снос дома №15. Но эмоция лечит симптом. Попробую сделать то, чего в городе никто не сделал: разложить ситуацию на субъектов, их интересы и дефициты. Потому что снесённый дом — не «злой бизнес», а диагноз всей системе городских отношений. Хроника (сухо). 7 июля начался снос довоенного здания

👍12💯2

15 Jul 2026, 17:16 UTC197 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @newkal_stream

Проект капремонта исторического здания школы № 21 в Калининграде прошёл экспертизу Экспертиза одобрила проект капитального ремонта фасада и крыши здания средней общеобразовательной школы № 21 имени Алексея Леонова в Калининграде. Соответствующая информация размещена на сайте Единого государственного реестра заключений. В качестве экспертной организации выступил калининградский Центр проектных экспертиз и ценообразо

🔥7

10 Jul 2026, 10:47 UTC406 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В Калининграде есть мост глупости (ул. Островского), а есть перекрёсток невнимательности - на Вагонке. Здесь регулярно и минимум раз в неделю происходит авария, а ответственные чиновники на предложение как-то дополнительно обезопасить аварийный участок, лишь разводят руками и шлют отписки - все должны соблюдать ПДД. Безусловно! Но точно так же водители должны соблюдать скоростной режим, но город почему-то ставит кам

💯14👍51

8 Jul 2026, 21:12 UTC327 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @svetla_nazavr

Ситуация со сносом здания на Правой набережной — это же опять про коммуникацию в городе. Точнее про ее отсутствие И если к неспособности власти нормально коммуницировать в ситуациях с Генпланом Калининграда, Двухъярусным мостом, трамвайной инфраструктурой, сносом исторических заборов, празднованием Дня города, топливным кризисом и других резонансных темах мы уже почти привыкли (но не собираемся это спускать на тормо

👍19💯13💔103

8 Jul 2026, 16:54 UTC345 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @svetla_nazavrPhoto

«Русский хлеб» уничтожает историческое наследие Калининграда В Калининграде 7 июля варварски снесли один из самых красивых домов на Правой набережной — административное здание конца XIX века, которое входило в комплекс вальцовой мельницы Кёнигсберга, а позже — Калининградского мукомольного завода. Это был домик с большими неоготическими окнами, выразительным кирпичным и деревянным декором, стоящий на прямой дороге

24😭11❤‍🔥4💯3👏2👍1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @rathshof. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“РАТСХОФ город-сад” (@rathshof), 464 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rathshof.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.