11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -404. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55,799–56,325 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 06:17
55,860
-28
14 Aug 2026, 16:23
55,888
-48
13 Aug 2026, 10:07
55,936
-49
12 Aug 2026, 11:24
55,985
-27
11 Aug 2026, 09:52
56,012
-40
10 Aug 2026, 08:11
56,052
-39
9 Aug 2026, 06:41
56,091
-29
8 Aug 2026, 05:34
56,120
-54
7 Aug 2026, 07:05
56,174
-59
6 Aug 2026, 10:10
56,233
-31
6 Aug 2026, 04:49
56,264
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.40%
avg views ÷ 55,860 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,460
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
20 (29 January 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
2,460
Reactions total
61
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
44
Videos
3
Links
47
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,370 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
646
47.2%
🔥
230
16.8%
👍
227
16.6%
🫡
61
4.45%
❤🔥
32
2.34%
👌
24
1.75%
⚡
20
1.46%
🤝
19
1.39%
🏆
18
1.31%
👏
18
1.31%
🥰
18
1.31%
🎉
16
1.17%
😱
16
1.17%
🗿
9
0.657%
🕊
6
0.438%
👀
4
0.292%
💯
3
0.219%
🦄
2
0.146%
🆒
1
0.073%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,370reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
459,137
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 20 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
459,000
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @xgiftnews. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 January 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎁 Passing the torch
GMGM, collectors!
We have important news: xGift is wrapping up. We've come a long way with you: from the project's first closed test builds to a full-fledged marketplace and aggregator for Telegram gifts — and all this time the gift scene has been growing faster than anyone expected.
🤝 In safe hands
Rather than spreading ourselves thin, we've decided to hand our work over to the market leader —…
🎁 Our best little gift is TON
GMGM, collectors!
On May 26, 2021, the TON mainnet went live. And while that's a technical date for crypto in general, for our market it's practically a family one.
🎁 Without TON, we're handless
Telegram gifts were born at the intersection of two things: the Telegram team's idea and TON's mature infrastructure, ready to take it on. Unique models, patterns, on-chain trade history, a li…
🎁 Portfolio is growing faster than grass
GMGM, collectors!
The gift market had been quiet for the past few weeks — but not for long. Volumes are picking up, charts are turning green, and we're back with a new digest.
🐒 Newcomers on the stage
The daily influx of users into Telegram Gifts suddenly doubled, reaching +1,500 new people per day. Fresh liquidity is making itself known: just recently, a new Korean collect…
🎁 Want some ice cream?
GMGM, collectors!
Another weekend is behind us. After the recent turbulence, we can exhale — the situation in the Telegram gift market has normalized a bit, and the charts are starting to please us with some slight growth again. We are back with a quick update.
📈 Green candles are in the room with us
The market is recovering, and some collections are showing a great bounce:
• Electrifying gr…
🎁 Too much fire
GMGM, collectors!
The Telegram gift market seems to have forgotten what the color green looks like and has headed downwards again. The blame lies on the rapid release of upgrades for several collections at once. But you and I know: where some see the end of an era, others find perfect entry points. We are back with a new weekly report.
🎁 New flame
The main headline of recent days was the release of…
🎁 A book is the best gift
GMGM, collectors!
The bloodbath week is behind us, we safely survived the weekend, and the market has slowly started to recover. There is a lot of news, so we are back with a quick update.
💖 Romance taking flight!
While many collections were testing new bottoms, some have already shown a solid bounce:
• Heart Locket added +10.49% and is trading at the 2,044 TON mark.
• Jewelry returns: Ge…
🎁 Gift bloodbath
GMGM, collectors!
Stocked up on popcorn? This week, the Telegram gift ecosystem decided to give us a real stress test. Volumes are dropping, prices are correcting, but the main thing is — even in a red market, there's always something to watch. We are back with a new weekly report.
🎁 Pepe returns
While the whole market is bleeding red, Plush Pepe is going against the trend. In a week, the floor gr…
🎁 Build your backpack
GMGM, collectors!
The highly anticipated upgrades for the Mood Pack and Pool Float collections are finally live, and the market reacted instantly. The upgrade mechanics have once again proven their power. Let’s break down what happened to the prices and what opportunities are up for grabs right now.
🎈 The upgrade effect
Right after the upgrades dropped, the price of non-upgraded backpacks pum…
🎁 The sun is rising, gifts are blooming
GMGM, collectors!
The holiday rush has settled, the ladies received their gifts, and as per tradition, we are summing up the week in the Telegram gifts market. Over the past seven days, the market not only cleared out anomalous trades nicely but also showed healthy organic movement. We are back with a new report.
🎁 The crash illusion
If you look at the raw numbers, it might …
🎁 A wolf in sheep's clothing: how to keep your gifts safe
GM, collectors!
Telegram gifts attracted both honest traders and scammers looking to easily profit off someone else's capital. Such incidents are on the rise, and one of our goals is to keep you and your assets safe.
🎃 Scammers are putting on masks
Fake accounts blatantly mimicking our project have appeared on the radar. They slide into your DMs, introduce …
🎁 The rarest gift in the ecosystem
GM, collectors!
💐 Today is the International Women's Day — a day when we talk about beauty, attention, and true value. In the world of Telegram gifts, we are used to constantly hunting for gems, but it is you, our lovely ladies, who give this process its real meaning.
Let's be honest: in many ways, it is for you that we spend hours monitoring the market, looking for those very ra…
🎁 Spring is in the air
GM, collectors!
Is everyone ready for International Women's Day? Judging by what we saw on the charts — definitely yes. This week, our beloved Telegram gifts market delivered not just surprises, but true all-time highs and a bit of mystery. We are back with a new report.
🥊 Fewer trades, bigger bags
The market is tightening around the whales. The total number of trades has dropped for the sec…
👍14🔥10❤6👀4🦄2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xgiftnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 237,140 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Domains linked from posts
One domainthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“xGift News” (@xgiftnews), 55,860 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xgiftnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
