Channel
@nishirenai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
401subscribers
+48 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003849782657 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nishirenai |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nishirenai |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 401 | +38 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 363 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 363 | +10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:49 | 353 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (5 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,993 |
| Reactions total | 478 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
478 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5431347167858013611 | 182 | 38.1% | |
| custom 5395629700133460355 | 164 | 34.3% | |
| custom 5445373221081735386 | 132 | 27.6% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 478reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
не тратьте время на петиции, от них не будет пользы, лучше продолжайте перекрывать хейт поддержкой рики и жалобами на посты и аккаунты
custom 544537322108173538617custom 539562970013346035511custom 543134716785801361110
i like this, i like that, let them see you sweat 🤩 join our mega GROUPS: babymonster 🌟 tuide 🌟 ourbirthday 🌟 keyveatz 🍫 kiiikiii 🤩 odd youth 🤩 hrtz.wav 🤩 rescene 🤩 cosmosy 🍫 twice 🌟 GIRLS: asa ✶ chiquita (babymonster) 🎻 tina (unchild) 🍰 ella (meovv) ☕️ jeongyeon ✶ momo (twice) 🥖 yoonchae ✶ manon ✶ daniela (katseye) 🤩 jiwoo (nmixx) 🐶 annie (allday project) 🤩 cl (2ne1) 🧸 ningselle (aespa) 🤩 yunah ✶ wonhee & iroha (…
УБЕДИТЕЛЬНАЯ ПРОСЬБА ❕ зайдите сейчас во все соц сети и напишите много хороших слов, как вы видите с каждой секундой хейта буквально все больше и больше. вы можете скопировать готовые фразы и маленькие тексты на английском, корейском и японском. самое главное просто пишите, это очень важно, чем больше тем лучше и не забывайте отправлять жалобы на протект сайт хайба + жалуйтесь на эти же посты в самих соц сетях
custom 539562970013346035527custom 543134716785801361120custom 544537322108173538617
❕ATTENTION PLEASE сейчас во всех соц сетях многие аккаунты распространяют ненависть и угрозы в сторону Рики, поэтому фанбаза собрала все аккаунты на которые нужно пожаловаться на сайте хайба 🔗: https://protect.hybecorp.com/report Category: BELIFT LAB > ENHYPEN Type: Report a malicious post > Slander/profanity ; Rumor/false information ; Threat to the artist’s safety Title: выберите один из вариантов Targeted Harass…
custom 539562970013346035510custom 54313471678580136118custom 54453732210817353864
и через день после этого он получает столько хейта..?
custom 539562970013346035534custom 543134716785801361122custom 544537322108173538619
вы можете скопировать готовые фразы и маленькие тексты на английском, корейском и японском, теперь добавляя теги. самое главное пишите, это очень важно и не забывайте отправлять жалобы на протект сайт хайба
custom 543134716785801361115custom 544537322108173538612custom 53956297001334603557
сейчас самое время показать рики нашу поддержку и любовь! энджин в твиттере выводят теги WITH LOVE TO NI-KI #WithNI_KIForever #NI_KI #니키 @enhypen @ENHYPEN_members 🖇 не забывайте, что для активности в тегах лучше добавлять что-то от себя, а не оставлять только одинаковые текстовые сообщения. чтобы ваши посты не выглядели как спам, прикрепляйте к ним фотографии или видео!
custom 543134716785801361113custom 53956297001334603559custom 54453732210817353867
ENGENE ❕пожалуйста, обратите внимание на эту ситуацию и отправьте жалобу в хайб в сторис одного довольно известного японского инстаграм-креатора были опубликованы материалы с угрозами в адрес рики и его семьи. это очень серьезная ситуация, которую нельзя игнорировать. это не первый случай, когда этот человек пытается привлечь к себе внимание подобным образом. ранее он уже отправлял угрозы в адрес рики, а также неодн…
custom 53956297001334603557custom 54313471678580136117custom 54453732210817353864
напишите также слова поддержки под последним постом в инсте
custom 543134716785801361111custom 53956297001334603559custom 54453732210817353868
пожалуйста, не поленитесь и напишите рики несколько добрых слов сейчас это действительно важно. когда люди ищут его имя или переходят по тегам, твиттер показывает все недавние публикации по этим запросам. наша задача сделать так, чтобы среди них было как можно больше постов с поддержкой и любовью, а не с хейтом обратите внимание на количество просмотров. это показывает, что люди продолжают искать информацию о рики …
custom 543134716785801361130custom 539562970013346035515custom 544537322108173538615
❕ ATTENTION ❕ рики мониторит соц сети, точно также как и мы, поэтому напишите ему много хороших и теплых слов в твиттере и виверс, чтобы перекрыть хейт. самое главное не взаимодействуйте с негативными постами, не спорьте с людьми, тихо и спокойно киньте жалобу на пост и потом на сайте ! людей, которые сейчас спорят и так достаточно много как кидать жалобу на сайт хайба будет в комментариях фразы и маленькие тексты…
custom 543134716785801361132custom 539562970013346035524custom 544537322108173538620
если вам будет нужна помощь с чем-то, то вы можете написать мне в анон @nshreibot я вам со всем помогу!
custom 543134716785801361114custom 539562970013346035511custom 54453732210817353869
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @nishirenai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 7,673 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@nishirenai named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“dance prodigy ⁷” (@nishirenai), 401 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nishirenai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.