Channel
@ProtectForRiki
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
34subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002954328960 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ProtectForRiki |
| Description | Mess @ProtectRikibot |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ProtectForRiki |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 34 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:26 | 34 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 15 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (15 March 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 60 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 00:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❕ATTENTION PLEASE сейчас во всех соц сетях многие аккаунты распространяют ненависть и угрозы в сторону Рики, поэтому фанбаза собрала все аккаунты на которые нужно пожаловаться на сайте хайба 🔗: https://protect.hybecorp.com/report Category: BELIFT LAB > ENHYPEN Type: Report a malicious post > Slander/profanity ; Rumor/false information ; Threat to the artist’s safety Title: выберите один из вариантов Targeted Harass…
сейчас самое время показать рики нашу поддержку и любовь! энджин в твиттере выводят теги WITH LOVE TO NI-KI #WithNI_KIForever #NI_KI #니키 @enhypen @ENHYPEN_members 🖇 не забывайте, что для активности в тегах лучше добавлять что-то от себя, а не оставлять только одинаковые текстовые сообщения. чтобы ваши посты не выглядели как спам, прикрепляйте к ним фотографии или видео!
ENGENE ❕пожалуйста, обратите внимание на эту ситуацию и отправьте жалобу в хайб в сторис одного довольно известного японского инстаграм-креатора были опубликованы материалы с угрозами в адрес рики и его семьи. это очень серьезная ситуация, которую нельзя игнорировать. это не первый случай, когда этот человек пытается привлечь к себе внимание подобным образом. ранее он уже отправлял угрозы в адрес рики, а также неодн…
❕ ATTENTION ❕ рики мониторит соц сети, точно также как и мы, поэтому напишите ему много хороших и теплых слов в твиттере и виверс, чтобы перекрыть хейт. самое главное не взаимодействуйте с негативными постами, не спорьте с людьми, тихо и спокойно киньте жалобу на пост и потом на сайте ! людей, которые сейчас спорят и так достаточно много как кидать жалобу на сайт хайба будет в комментариях фразы и маленькие тексты…
❤1
ᅠ✉️ || FOR NI-KI, WITH LOVE !! 🖇️ в последнее время на рики льётся много хейта из-за его слов в эфире. часть фандома восприняла их неправильно, и теперь его обвиняют в ужасных вещах, которых он не совершал. мы все знаем, что рики добрый, чуткий и невероятно трудолюбивый человек, давайте зайдём на виверс и напишем ему тёплые, поддерживающие слова !! 👀ниже шаблоны на корейском. вы можете копировать их для своих пост…
(❕) то, как подать жалобу в RedNote текст для описания жалобы: this account repeatedly harasses the idol, violating personal boundaries, redeeming location information также вы можете пожаловаться не только на тот пост, который я отметила, но и на другие, например на 4. пост можно выбрать нажав на "Note evidence".
(❕) китайская сасэнка Рики тоже присутствовала на концерте бтс, сидя ОЧЕНЬ близко к энха. весь её аккаунт в сяохоншу построен на преследовании Рики абсолбтно везде: в аэропорту, на отдыхе, после каких либо мероприятий. такие люди непосредственно могуть быть самой главной угрозой для айдолов, учитывая что она постоянно выкупает личную информацию Рики. ( 🗯 ) пожалуйста подайте жалобу, заблокируйте все её аккаунты в соц…
(❕) данные сасэн аккаунты добрались до Рики даже тогда, когда казалось бы он должен спокойно отдыхать с остальными ребятами. также на фотографии (1) вы можете заметить то, что приближение не настолько большое, это значит то, что они знали о том, где будут сидеть энха и выкупили эту информацию и билеты ближе к их местам. это крайне небезопасно для Рики и остальных мемберов, ведь это не первый раз, когда сасэнки настол…
(❕) пожалуйста, зайдите в инстаграм и оставьте приятные комментарии к посту Ни-ки, все позитивные. сейчас его заваливают спамом, и многие комментарии вовсе не о нём. https://www.instagram.com/p/DW8hNzPgJH0/?igsh=MWt0NXR1MG9nbXlpOQ==
Завтра пройдёт фансайн в присутствии лишь 5 мемберов. Б*лифт решил не отменять фансайн, а провести его, не смотря на то, что Ни-ки является Японцем и ему не могут выдать нужную визу, чтобы работать в Китае. Не забывайте выводить хештеги в X (Twitter), прикрепляя фотки из поста: STOP THE SIDELINING. STOP THE DISCRIMINATION. STOP THE EXCLUSION. BELIFT RESPECT NI-KI #FairTreatmentForNI_KI @BELIFTLAB @ENHYPEN
Её акк в тт https://www.tiktok.com/@66cattt?_r=1&_t=ZS-94hpC6QHPr0
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ProtectForRiki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ProtectForRiki named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Protect 西村力” (@ProtectForRiki), 34 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProtectForRiki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.