Channel
@rikinikch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,805subscribers
+56 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002147270472 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rikinikch |
| Created | Between 1 March 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rikinikch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 3,805 | +12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 3,793 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 3,785 | +36 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 3,749 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (3 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20,874 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rikinikch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
❕ATTENTION PLEASE еще один пост который стремительно набирает обороты, жалуемся точно так же как и в этом посте изменяя: Link: https://x.com/i/status/2085607433842421777 Username: real_emi1 Attachment прикрепила ❕так же жалуемся и в самом твиттере по туториалу
пожалуйста не тратьте свое время на ссоры внутри фд, доказывать что то кому то нет смысла, для тех кто хейтит рики и сону это может быть смыслом жизни, потому что они не нашли удовольствие в том, чтобы делать добро, поэтому решили показывать свою злость в сторону невинных людей. если вы видите хейтерские посты в их сторону в любой соцсети везде наши действия должны быть одинаковыми: репорт > оскорбления, травля и тд
пожалуйста не забывайте чистить поиск🙏🏻
задачи на сегодня, в этом посте также есть теги и сообщения для сону!
❕ATTENTION PLEASE как вы знаете сейчас в твиттере появилось очень много аккаунтов которые распространяют негатив и ненависть в сторону рики и сону, я собрала все аккаунты для подачи жалоб в самом твиттере. на первом видео показано как подать жалобу на сам аккаунт, на втором на пост причина жалобы: hate, abuse, or harassment (проявления ненависти, оскорбления или домогательства) > block @user (заблокировать @пользова…
❕подайте жалобу и на сам пост в твиттере тоже
пожалуйста не пишите ничего в комментариях и не доказывайте что это не правда, каждый комментарий повышает охваты поста
ПОЖАЛУЙСТА КИНЬТЕ ЖАЛОБУ ПОСТ ОГРОМНЫЕ ОХВАТЫ НАБИРАЕТ И МНОГИЕ В ЭТО ВЕРЯТ
❕ATTENTION PLEASE сейчас в твиттере набирает обороты пост, с ложными "извинениями рики" которых вовсе не было, пожалуйста подайте жалобу на данный пост на сайте хайба, также если увидите подобные посты жалуйтесь на них точно также изменяя юзернейм, ссылки и приложения 🔗: https://protect.hybecorp.com/report Category: BELIFT LAB > ENHYPEN Type: Report a malicious post > Rumor/false information Title: Spreading false …
я подготовил еще слова поддержки для рики на английском, корейском и японском. первая часть здесь ! пожалуйста, не поленитесь, скопируйте фразы или небольшие тексты и опубликуйте их в разных социальных сетях. это займет всего пару минут, но даже одно сообщение уже имеет значение. нам нужно сделать все возможное, чтобы перекрыть волну хейта, так как негативные сообщения распространяются и набирают охваты наравне с хо…
сейчас лучше сосредоточиться и вложить все свои силы в жалобы на хейт посты и аккаунты и на поддержку Рики
не подписывайте щас никакие петиции, даже если кажетсч что они возможно помогут, формулировка самих петиций очень важна если мы хотим их применить. у нас был уже не очень хороший опыт с ними, б*лифту очень все равно на количество подписей, формулировка была неподходящая и по итогу это нам ни чем не помогло....
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @rikinikch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 10,743 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@rikinikch named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nishimura Riki ⁷” (@rikinikch), 3,805 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rikinikch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.