📍آدرس پیج : https://www.instagram.com/nilufar.abedini?igsh=bjE5OGpuMzNwNTRr
📍هر سوالی در مورد دوره و خدمات داری اینجا بپرس
@Tarahebartar_team
📍 کانال بله
https://ble.ir/nilufarabedini
ایده استوری تو این کانال گذاشته میشه
🌐 سایت
Nilufarabedini.ir
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +385. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,836–21,337 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 19:07
21,279
+59
13 Aug 2026, 06:57
21,220
+45
12 Aug 2026, 09:32
21,175
+55
11 Aug 2026, 06:46
21,120
+92
10 Aug 2026, 09:38
21,028
+58
9 Aug 2026, 10:52
20,970
+53
8 Aug 2026, 07:25
20,917
+23
7 Aug 2026, 14:00
20,894
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:49
20,894
first reading
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.27%
avg views ÷ 21,279 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,330
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.954%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
36 (1 August 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
48,024
Reactions total
445
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,510
Videos
≈526
Links
≈346
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
9m 51s
Average length
1m 06s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
445 reactions across 35 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
262
58.9%
👍
68
15.3%
🔥
39
8.76%
💯
17
3.82%
👏
16
3.60%
😍
16
3.60%
🙏
5
1.12%
🤝
5
1.12%
🫡
5
1.12%
🤔
3
0.674%
🏆
2
0.449%
😁
2
0.449%
🎉
1
0.225%
🕊
1
0.225%
🤣
1
0.225%
🥰
1
0.225%
🥴
1
0.225%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 445reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔴 پرامپت این عکس 🛥
وارد chatgpt شو
عکست رو وارد کن
و بعد این پرامپت رو بده👇
Use the uploaded photo of the person as the face reference. Replace the model’s face with the person’s face from the uploaded reference image.
Preserve the person’s facial identity exactly and faithfully: same face shape, eyes, eyebrows, nose, lips, skin tone, facial proportions, natural skin texture, and overall recognizable appearance. Do…
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
مقایسه لعنتی رو بذار کنار 🥲
یکی رو میبینی ۵ ساله داره کار میکنه
بعد خودتو با نتیجهی امروزِ اون مقایسه میکنی و میگی:
من چرا هنوز اینجام؟ 😐
لطفا خودتو با مقایسه دیگران داغون نکن 🙌
اگر داری چیزی رو که ارائه میدی یا میفروشی، خودت باورش داری؟
با نیت خوب انجامش میدی یا فقط و فقط پوله برات مهمه؟
اینارو تو دل خودت جواب بده چون همینا رو برکت زندگیت تاثیر داره✨️
🟠 تو کارت تمرکز داری ⁉️
دیدی وقتی یه فیلم میبینی چطوری غرقش میشی؟ 🎬
برای کارت هم باید اینجوری باشی
راجع به هدفت به کسی هیچی نگو 🤫
اگه واقعاً میخوای تو کارت موفق بشی باید تمام تمرکزت رو بذاری رو کارت و به حواشی اهمیت ندی
بیاین از اینجا شروع کنیم که:
واقعا هدفی داری که تورو از خواب بیدار کنه؟ ☀️
یا یه سوال مهمتر⁉️
دقیقاً میدونی برای چی داری تلاش میکنی؟🤔
خیلی وقتا مشکل ما کمکاری نیست؛❌
مشکل اینه که کلی کار انجام میدیم، ولی نمیدونیم قراره این کارها ما رو به کجا برسونن. 🧭
مثلاً هر روز محتوا میذاریم
آموزش میبینیم
پیجمون رو تغییر میدیم
ولی آخر ماه که نگاه میکنیم میبینیم فقط خیلی مشغول بودیم ⏳
نه اینکه واقعاً پیشرفت کرده باشی…
🔴 برای کاور ریلزهاتون میتونید از این پک کاور استفاده کنید
برای دانلودش بزن اینجا 🖐
بقیه پیج هارو هم روزهای آینده آنالیز میکنم🤍
@niloufar_abedini
❤3😍3🙏1
Signed Niloufar abedini
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @niloufar_abedini. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
سما ادیت | 𝑆𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡💜 @samaedit · 104,674 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 August 2026
نسا پیروزی فرد| NESA PIRUZIFARD @nesa_piruzi · 123,286 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
آموزش ادیت باموبایل|ادیت _الهام @edit_elham · 134,987 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نیلوفر عابدینی | طراحی با موبایل| تولید محتوا | ادیت” (@niloufar_abedini), 21,279 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/niloufar_abedini.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
