◻️ آموزش اینستاگرام و تولید محتوا
◼️ توسعه کسب و کار و درآمد با تولید محتوای علمی و خلاقانه
ارتباط با ادمین آکادمی جهت همکاری:
@ShainaAcademy
ارتباط با پشتیبان سایت و محصولات:
@Edit_Toolbox
Created
Between 1 March 2023 and 30 November 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements spanning 1 day, net -61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49,922–50,001 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 07:44
49,931
-61
13 Aug 2026, 23:31
49,992
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.18%
avg views ÷ 49,931 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,090
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
25 (10 June 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
27,134
Reactions total
291
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 02:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
198
Videos
49
Links
297
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 06s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
772 reactions across 25 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
518
67.1%
🙏
110
14.2%
👍
63
8.16%
👏
21
2.72%
🔥
21
2.72%
😍
15
1.94%
❤🔥
11
1.42%
😘
5
0.648%
🥰
4
0.518%
🤩
3
0.389%
💅
1
0.13%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 772reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
خب دوستان عزیزم با توجه به نتیجه نظرسنجی، تا پایان فردا جدولهای png و باکیفیت بالا رو براتون آماده میکنیم.
➖جدولها طوری طراحی میشن که مناسب هر نوع پرسش و پاسخی باشه و استفاده ازشون هم خیلی سادست. کافیه بندازید روی ویدئو و متن دلخواهتون رو بنویسید روش.
📱💻 حالا برای تولید محتوا به سبک پینگپنگی به چی نیاز داریم؟
➖۱) پرسش و پاسخهای جذاب برای مخاطب:
باید جذاب باشن، کوتاه باشن و دغدغه مخاطب باشن پس خیلی مهمه چه سوالاتی مطرح میکنید
➖۲) جدولهای آماده برای روی ویدئو:
شما به جدولهای نیمه شفاف و با ظاهر مناسب نیاز دارید که با فوتوشاپ طراحی میشن.
چون مخاطب برای دیدن پاسخ سؤال بعدی منتظر میمونه و ریتم سریع ویدئو اجازه نمیده محتوا بهراحتی خستهکننده بشه.
همچنین نمایش سؤال و جواب روی تصویر باعث میشه پیام حتی برای مخاطبی که ویدئو رو بدون صدا میبینه هم قابل فهم باشه.
بریم یکم تخصصیتر بهش نگاه کنیم
📚 اگه بخوام یکم تخصصیتر بهتون بگم چرا این سبک محتوا عموما بازدید و بازخورد خوبی میگیره به صورت خلاصه میتونم بگم:
◾️۱) وقتی سؤالها مطرح میشن، مغز با یه گپ اطل…
🎥 سبک محتوایی پینگپنگی (Ping-Pong Content)
پینگپنگی یکی از فرمتهای ریتمیک تولید محتوای کوتاهه که ساختارش بر پایهی رفتوبرگشت سریع سؤال و جواب شکل میگیره؛ درست مثل رفتوبرگشت توپ تو بازی پینگپنگ.
➖برای اجرای این سبک، معمولاً دو نفر در ویدئو حضور دارن و سؤالها و پاسخها با کاتهای سریع و ریتم بالا پشت سر هم ردوبدل میشن.
حتی اگر تک نفره تولید محتوا میکنید میتونید سوال هارو ضبط کنید با صدای خودتون و بعدش پخش ک…
⭕️ اسم این سبک محتوایی، پینگپنگی (ping-pong) به همراه جدول هست.
🎥 لینک ریلز خودم که از این تکنیک و سبک محتوایی استفاده کردم:
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DPCAglIkftw/?igsh=dnpienRybWZvZHF6
برید ببینید و بیاید ادامه توضیحات رو بخونید
🎥 اولین سبک محتوایی که میخوام بهتون آموزش بدم، این سبکی هست که تو ریلز بالا خودم باهاش بیشتر از ۳ میلیون ویو گرفتم
همه شما تو حوزه خودتون میتونید از این سبک استفاده کنید
لینک ریلز (کلیک کنید)
بچهها قبل از اینکه اولین تکنیک و سبک محتوایی رو بهتون آموزش بدم باید این رو بدونید نکاتی که از این به بعد اینجا میخوام بهتون بگم، مطالبی هست که باید کلی هزینه کنید تا تو دورههای چند میلیونی مختلف، این موارد رو تو سطح خیلی پایینتر بهتون آموزش بدن.
پس اینکه اینجا و رایگان این مطالب رو قراره باهم پیش ببریم، بهش کم توجهی نکنید و حتما استفاده کنید، حرفهای هم ازش استفاده کنید، شک نکنید لول آپ میشید.
از نتایجتون حتما ب…
🙏23❤14👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @shaina_amiri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@shaina_amiri edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
تعداد اکت اپلیکشنهای مود شده که براتون میذارم خیلی کمه
پس یعنی استقبالتون کمه و دیگه اپلیکیشن مود و آنلاک شده نذاریم؟
✅میخوایم بذارید95%
❌نه نمیخوایم5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
نسا پیروزی فرد| NESA PIRUZIFARD @nesa_piruzi · 123,412 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مهندس شاینا امیری | Shaina Amiri” (@shaina_amiri), 49,931 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shaina_amiri.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.