17 measurements spanning 17 days, net -256. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,546–35,878 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Sept 2026, 09:35
35,584
-13
1 Sept 2026, 08:43
35,597
-31
31 Aug 2026, 06:04
35,628
-24
30 Aug 2026, 04:13
35,652
-4
29 Aug 2026, 06:15
35,656
-9
28 Aug 2026, 03:47
35,665
-14
27 Aug 2026, 05:57
35,679
-5
26 Aug 2026, 06:58
35,684
-1
25 Aug 2026, 08:11
35,685
-16
24 Aug 2026, 11:04
35,701
-21
22 Aug 2026, 19:07
35,722
-20
21 Aug 2026, 10:16
35,742
-31
20 Aug 2026, 10:12
35,773
-28
19 Aug 2026, 07:27
35,801
-19
18 Aug 2026, 09:03
35,820
-12
17 Aug 2026, 09:37
35,832
-8
16 Aug 2026, 07:15
35,840
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.6%
avg views ÷ 35,584 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,210
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.174%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
21 (7 August 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
104,120
Reactions total
181
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 19:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈538
Videos
≈124
Links
≈227
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
181 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
109
60.2%
🔥
30
16.6%
🥰
18
9.94%
👍
13
7.18%
👏
9
4.97%
🙏
2
1.10%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Use the provided reference image. FACE AND IDENTITY
PRESERVE COMPLETELY: Keep the appearance 100% the same; do not alter facial features, proportions, skin texture, or hair color. Cinematic film grain effect. A natural and spontaneous shot captured in motion.
Close-up from the waist up. The woman stands with her back to the camera, then suddenly turns her head over her shoulder towards the camera; a lively and natura…
New filter:
Create a dramatic lighting effect by projecting a realistic window shadow onto your face and clothes.
Shadow lines must be realistic and natural.
Strictly preserve the original facial features, expression and clothing as shown in the photo, without any modification. The end result is....
New filter:
Add strong realistic long-exposure across the entire subject as if captured while moving, vintage film aesthetic, natural lighting, land unchanged facial features
تمامی عزیزانی که تایم مشاوره امروزشون جابجا شده
بابت این جابجایی عذرخواهی میکنم
لطفا اگر پیام جابجایی براتون ارسال نشده
به شماره پشتیبانی پیام بدید
ممنون از همراهی شما💗🫂
🍒بریم برای آموزش این ترند kinda chic که خیلی جذابه و تا پر نشده درستش کن
فقط با یه ویدیو
https://www.instagram.com/p/DbvkmtvgvM3/?igsh=czJ2NmZ6ZWcyOWVr
Fereshteh shadi🌱(تولیدمحتوا) pinned «توو ادیت دوست دارید پکیج ها آماده باشه یا نه جزییات یادگرفتن ادیت اش براتون مهم تره»
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @fereshtesocialmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
توو ادیت دوست دارید پکیج ها آماده باشه یا نه جزییات یادگرفتن ادیت اش براتون مهم تره
آماده باشه(مثلا نوشته یا قلاب های ترند،ابزارهای استوری و …)43%
نه جزییات ادیت و نحوه درست کردنش برام مهم تره66%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
اموزشکده جمینی ، مارولوس، کلوتریدی و ایلاستریتور @anahidapattrrn · 4,111#76
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
آموزش با سعید کِـرلی @saedcurly · 70,737 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 20 August 2026
ابزار ادیت استوری @abzarstoryAsma · 97,205 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026
🎀🫧پـــریادیت🥞🩰 @paari_edit · 65,820 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
نبات|درامدزایی+لایفاستایل🍦 @panahe_nabat · 44,952 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 27 August 2026
محدثه شجاع پور | ادمینی و آموزش اینستاگرام @mimshgraphy_admin · 37,120 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fereshteh shadi🌱(تولیدمحتوا)” (@fereshtesocialmedia), 35,584 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fereshtesocialmedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
