Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 1,525 - 1,680 NEWERA

Channel

1,525 - 1,680 NEWERA

@newera1525_1680

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,721subscribers

+412 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002849493490
TypeChannel
Username@newera1525_1680
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/newera1525_1680

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,3092,7272,5186 August 2026 — 2,309 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,325 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,397 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,435 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,450 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,656 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,720 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,725 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,719 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,722 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,718 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,727 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,724 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,721 subscribers2,7216 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net +412. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,246–2,790 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 07:192,721-3
13 Sept 2026, 19:412,724-3
10 Sept 2026, 06:392,727+9
4 Sept 2026, 23:412,718-4
1 Sept 2026, 04:282,722+3
28 Aug 2026, 18:262,719-6
26 Aug 2026, 03:232,725+5
22 Aug 2026, 18:062,720+64
19 Aug 2026, 11:442,656+206
16 Aug 2026, 20:452,450+15
13 Aug 2026, 13:482,435+38
10 Aug 2026, 03:312,397+72
7 Aug 2026, 11:332,325+16
6 Aug 2026, 19:172,309first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 38 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏20100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC259 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

반도체, AIDC 는 죽은부X 만지기 뭐 이런건가여

🙏2

7 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC305 viewsread 7 August 2026

장 시작후 반도체는 빠르게 되돌려 내려왔네요 나머진 다 불장

7 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC506 viewsread 7 August 2026

생각해보니 금리가 떨어지는건 미국이고.. 한국은 금리를 올리고 있지 않나여

7 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC540 viewsread 7 August 2026

반대진영을 대안으로 생각하지 않죠 그쪽(유사) 진영 중에 새로운 계파나 인물을 찾겠죠

7 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC288 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dynewscollecters

하지만 난 저쪽들을 못믿는게 애초에 돌아설거였으면 처음부터 좌빨이 아님ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 또 그때가면 에이 이번엔 다르겠지 하고 또찍음

7 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC240 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @petrojimmyPhoto

#매크로 금리 떨어지고, 환율 떨어지고, 물가 잡히면? 3低 호황 시즌2인가요?

7 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC331 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

인플레이션 감안하고, 주요 바이오 시총 생각하면 1조까지는 세일즈라 봐도 되지 않을까여?

🙏2

7 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC210 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @hedgehara

시총 3천억 안되는거 가져와서 썰풀면 아 저 새끼 내종목 사달라고 저러는구나 하시면 됩니다

7 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC723 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

사람들이 관심을 갖는 주식은 당연히 거래량이 많을테죠 그 중에서 바이낸스나 하리의 거래량은 '아주 순수한 개인의 관심사' 를 나타내지 않을까 생각합니다 평소엔 원자재, 반도체 관련 종목이 항상 높은 자리를 차지하고 있고, 지금도 여전하지만 SPCX가 꽤 상위권으로 올라왔네요. 실적발표했던 AAOI도 좀 올라오는 모습이고요. 또 하나, 여기서 반도체 관련 종목 거래량이 줄어드는지를 모니터링 해보는 것도 좋은 참고자료가 될 수 있겠네요

7 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC255 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bornlupin

Rosenblatt , AAOI, 투자의견 매수 유지 , 목표주가 $220, 탑픽 당사는 투자자들이 이미 충분히 예상하고 있던 생산 능력 제약과 부품 수급 시기 문제에도 불구하고 AAOI의 2Q26 실적을 매우 긍정적으로 평가합니다. 부품 공급 제약(특히 DSP 및 TIA)과 캐파 확장 시기로 인해 CY26 추정치는 하향 조정되었으나, CY27 추정치는 소폭 상승했습니다. 또한 경영진이 제시한 2H27 데이터센터 매출 목표 대비 약 3분의 1 수준의 할인을 적용했기 때문에 당사의 CY27 수치는 여전히 보수적일 가능성이 있습니다. CY27 EPS의 약 27배를 기반으로 목표가 $220와 함께 '매수' 투자의견 및 Top Pick 지위를 재확인합니다

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @newera1525_1680. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“1,525 - 1,680 NEWERA” (@newera1525_1680), 2,721 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newera1525_1680.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.