Channel
@netscripor
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
803subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002704817171 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @netscripor |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/netscripor |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 803 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:50 | 804 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 803 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 803 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 20 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
106 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 68 | 64.2% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 17.9% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 6.60% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 2.83% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.89% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 1.89% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.943% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.943% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.943% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.943% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.943% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @netscripor. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 February 2026 to 10 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Всем привет👋, меня давно не было, на то есть свои причины, в целом вести технический блог оказалось для меня сложным, потому что это отнимает очень много времени и превращается в своего рода тамагочи. Так уж вышло, что после выхода поста я поменял работу (это отдельная история), на всякий случай всё, что я публикую тут, является моим мнением и никак не отражает позицию моего работодателя. Пока испытательный срок, по…
👍16🍾1👏1
Российским хостерам в Европе продолжает тотально невезти Недавно накрыли PQHosting (который стал THE.Hosting, но его это не спасло), а сегодня новая серия Коллеги, привет. Мы получили действительно плохое известие от MIRhosting. Их поставщик — дата-центр nLighten — внезапно, без предупреждения и переходного периода, отключил оборудование в Нидерландах и Германии. Доступ к серверам ограничен, ситуация тяжёлая. MIRh…
😢7❤1🤣1🫡1
Всем привет! У нас тут пятый митап намечается, на этот раз в Москве. Для тех кто никогда не был, вот вам короткое саммари зачем вам туда идти: - встретиться и пообщаться с вашими друзьями, коллегами, знакомыми, ну или найти новых); - послушать буквально тройку технических докладов (детали ищите тут) и за пивом/пиццей/колой обсудить зачем, как и почему; - принять участие в КВИЗе и выиграть сумасшедшие призы (они …
❤5👍1
Public iPerf3 servers in Russia https://github.com/itdoginfo/russian-iperf3-servers Блокнот сетевика #полезноесетевику
👍6❤2💯1
Ладно, теперь серьёзное! Прошёл LIKE A BAR #4!!! Вот небольшой саммари: - пришёл 51 человек - послушали доклады, выпили пива, поели пиццы - много ОБЩАЛИСЬ (самое важное потому что это) - отлично провели время (очень надеюсь) Как и обещал, все презентации приложил. Записи может будут чуть позже, пока не обещаю, была первая попытка и не скажу, что она прям супер удачная. Если вы тоже хотите, то следующий митап план…
👍10
Я же удаленьщик со стажем, если кто не знал, так вот, пришло мое время, кажется, надеть очки🥸, глаза последний месяц просто выходят из чата, не помогают чудо-мониторы, в которых минимальное количество синего свечения и т. д. Поделитесь, как вы тренируете глаза, пару лет назад я ставил EyeLeo, но за полгода я уже просто игнорировал все паузы и т. д. Сейчас я уже прям конкретно запереживал за глаза, потому что вечером …
❤5
У Лю Цысиня в "Вечная жизнь Смерти" есть момент где человечество пытается оставить о себе хоть какой-то памятник во вселенной и приходит к выводу что единственный вариант это высечь послание на камне, но человечеству это не помогло никак. У меня почему-то такие же мысли навевает список каналов в Технологическом Болте Генона, куда попал и @patchcord. Там мало каналов про сети, поэтому я покажу свой список для чтения (…
👍4❤3
Я таки переехал с Windows на Linux. В качестве основного инструмента для работы теперь использую Remote Desktop Manager (solo edition), если вы пользовались mRemoteNG или Xshell, то это почти то же самое, но на Linux, без всяких там бубнов с Wine. Рекомендую попробовать😏 А чем вы пользуетесь? ✍️ Блокнот сетевика #linux #полезноесетевику
👍3❤2🤣2
VXLAN, не пожалейте времени, посмотрите этот видос, именно после него у меня всё стало на свои места, дядька рассказывает, как было (классика 3-х уровней) и какую проблему решает VXLAN. Все простым языком без умных слов. Блокнот сетевика #полезноесетевику
👍18👌2💋2❤1👎1
5 часов видео про то, как работает ТСПУ. Может, за выходные кто осилит. 😁 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raNP3IMgwRU Блокнот сетевика #полезноесетевику
👍10
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @netscripor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 803,723 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Блокнот сетевика” (@netscripor), 803 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/netscripor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.