Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FIGHT FOR GLORY

Channel

FIGHT FOR GLORY

@DIVISION_STK

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,751subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001324301820
TypeChannel
Username@DIVISION_STK
Created23 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/DIVISION_STK

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,7235,8455,7846 August 2026 — 5,740 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,740 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,738 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,733 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,723 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,724 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,804 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,834 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,841 subscribers7 September 2026 — 5,845 subscribers12 September 2026 — 5,837 subscribers15 September 2026 — 5,831 subscribers30 September 2026 — 5,819 subscribers7 October 2026 — 5,813 subscribers13 October 2026 — 5,799 subscribers16 October 2026 — 5,790 subscribers25 October 2026 — 5,778 subscribers29 October 2026 — 5,774 subscribers1 November 2026 — 5,770 subscribers4 November 2026 — 5,758 subscribers7 November 2026 — 5,753 subscribers11 November 2026 — 5,751 subscribers5,7516 August 202611 November 2026
22 measurements spanning 97 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,705–5,863 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 09:595,751-2
7 Nov 2026, 06:265,753-5
4 Nov 2026, 05:465,758-12
1 Nov 2026, 02:305,770-4
29 Oct 2026, 00:205,774-4
25 Oct 2026, 12:295,778-12
16 Oct 2026, 10:495,790-9
13 Oct 2026, 11:285,799-14
7 Oct 2026, 03:395,813-6
30 Sept 2026, 07:565,819-12
15 Sept 2026, 18:195,831-6
12 Sept 2026, 05:215,837-8
7 Sept 2026, 19:585,845+4
2 Sept 2026, 23:065,841+7
30 Aug 2026, 18:235,834+30
27 Aug 2026, 12:465,804+80
24 Aug 2026, 06:485,724+1
20 Aug 2026, 12:335,723-10
17 Aug 2026, 09:555,733-5
10 Aug 2026, 00:305,738first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.2%
avg views ÷ 5,751 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,680
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held31 (7 May 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total8,410
Reactions total378
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 19:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 30s
Average length
1m 35s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,503 reactions across 31 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤73729.4%
🫡63925.5%
😁45418.1%
👍1716.83%
😢1335.31%
🤬1244.95%
🔥843.36%
⚡612.44%
🤝281.12%
🥴281.12%
❤‍🔥210.839%
🤯100.4%
👎50.2%
🤷‍♂30.12%
🥱30.12%
👏10.04%
🤔10.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,503 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 10:35 UTC≈1,230 views70 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

😁61🔥6⚡2❤1

3 Nov 2026, 10:35 UTC≈1,030 views63 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @ukraine_contextPhoto

14-річний «бідний» хлопчик ДО того, як впав з паркану, який сам ламав і кидав каміння у вікна: «Та тебе мой батя еб*ло снесёт! Ало! Свинья, на меня посмотри! Смотри на меня, уёб*ще! Получи уёб*к нах*й!». 14-річний «бідний» хлопчик ПІСЛЯ того, як впав з паркану: 😭🫪🥴

😁54🥴4⚡3👎1🤔1

2 Nov 2026, 17:41 UTC≈1,600 views29 reactionsread 4 November 2026

це в доповнення до Тімура Фіррудіновича, Рустама Абдуррахмановича з сьогоднішньої ізби-катівні НГУ, Рустема Енверовича з РНБО, в яких все по кайфу

😁23🤬6

2 Nov 2026, 17:41 UTC≈1,580 views28 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @prokyiv_mediaPhoto

Новим заступником начальника КМВА призначили Фархада Гулієва. До повномасштабної війни він був адвокатом, а з 2022 року служив у ЗСУ та Міноборони.

❤16🤬12

23 Oct 2026, 15:35 UTC≈2,970 views188 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Азовців з поверненням додому! 🫡❤️

❤105🫡67🔥16

15 Oct 2026, 16:12 UTC≈3,630 views44 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @group_1032

https://youtu.be/IGfbyc4WAy4?si=tb15yHMK2hn6-_3E

🫡30❤11😢2❤‍🔥1

14 Oct 2026, 18:46 UTC≈3,300 views89 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Всіх причетних до боротьби за Україну з Покровою. «Новодєльні» дати типу 1/10 не мають приживатися в правильних колах. На фото марш 10-річної давнини Без філософських роздумів - просто нагадування, що ми на цей шлях стали задового до того, як мурзіки, що наверху, почали присвоювати собі свята до яких вони не причетні.

❤84❤‍🔥3🥴2

1 Oct 2026, 06:43 UTC≈3,110 views77 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Про 1 та 14/10. 01 жовтня 2003 на базі 7 бригади спеціального призначення було сформовано 73 Морський центр Спеціальних Операцій ім. Кошового Отамана Антіна Головатого. Це достойне свято, щоб розпочати жовтень. Покрова, День козацтва, День УПА, День захисників/захисниць - 14 жовтня. Все інше від лукавих. Хто з властьпрідєржащих почне розповідати про різницю в календарях - хай родичів своїх привітають з Днем народ…

❤64👍10👎3

30 Sept 2026, 17:27 UTC≈2,740 views33 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @neoblikovanyiPhoto

Хто б міг подумати.

🤬32🤯1

27 Sept 2026, 08:10 UTC≈3,270 views16 reactionsread 4 November 2026

https://youtu.be/6-yknLrAn0U?si=tRnMD2p-J-qTe69q

👍12🔥4

16 Sept 2026, 10:03 UTC≈3,530 views42 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @ab3armyVideo

Розкриваємо деталі та масштаби першого сезону «Вівальді» від Третього армійського корпусу. Хто такі «флаговтики» рф і чому для боротьби з ними Трійка створила об’єднаний штаб, який на тактичному рівні координував дії спеціальних і розвідувальних підрозділів у межах єдиного задуму? Про ліквідацію інфільтрованого противника, чого це коштувало окупантам і як виглядають 85 км² території, очищеної від ворога, — мовою ма…

🫡34👍7❤1

11 Sept 2026, 18:49 UTC≈3,790 views49 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Сьогодні 11 вересня. 25 років, як світ змінився назавжди. З нагоди - рекомендуємо подивитися відео про операцію «Анаконда», там дуже толкова передісторія про ввід американських військ в Афганістан, в тому числі й про теракти 09/11 (так, відео російською мовою) Сподіваємося лише, що наш канал не читає мовний омбудсмен і не накатає заяву в мусарню, хоча ця дура ще певно досі зайнята тим, чому ГУРівці та оператори СБ …

❤49

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @DIVISION_STK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

The Observers
@contlictobservers · 44,640
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FIGHT FOR GLORY” (@DIVISION_STK), 5,751 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DIVISION_STK.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.