Channel
@jpzso
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
184,367subscribers
+172,383 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001845584446 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jpzso |
| Description | #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #马来 #缅甸 #泰国 #越南 #迪拜 #老挝 #斯里兰卡 #巴基斯坦 #非洲 东南亚大事件频道专注于东南亚华人最新动态资讯，生活故事分享，海外华人求助，让你看尽海外华人大小事。 本频道谢绝任何政治敏感新闻，新闻仅供参考，无刻意引导~~ |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 227 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jpzso |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
@jpzso was previously reachable at these 3 handles, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 6 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @jpzso/90688 · this entry20 Sept 2026, 19:42 UTC | @jpzvo/8982120 Sept 2026, 19:42 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @jpzso/91092 · this entry24 Sept 2026, 17:28 UTC | @jpzvo/9022424 Sept 2026, 17:28 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @jpzso/91793 · this entry1 Oct 2026, 14:26 UTC | @jpzvo/909251 Oct 2026, 14:26 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @jpzvo/918079 Oct 2026, 21:21 UTC | @jpzso/92669 · this entry9 Oct 2026, 21:21 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @jpzvo/9189610 Oct 2026, 17:12 UTC | @jpzso/92758 · this entry10 Oct 2026, 17:12 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @jpzvo/9197811 Oct 2026, 15:54 UTC | @jpzso/92835 · this entry11 Oct 2026, 15:54 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @jpzvo | 412 (6/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (241–171) |
| @oxkkk | 194 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (181–13) |
| @bx777 | 168 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @bx777 (153–15) |
| @Bx666x | 44 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.89 | under a minute | @Bx666x (24–20) |
| @GTR133 | 35 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (30–5) |
| @jianpuzhaiu | 18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.88 | under a minute | this entry (17–1) |
| @oc123 | 17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @oc123 (12–5) |
| @yuenanE | 15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.84 | 72 seconds | this entry (14–1) |
| @dibai8 | 14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 8 minutes | @dibai8 (14–0) |
| @baoliaoc | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.88 | 72 seconds | this entry (11–0) |
| @dubaixinwen2 | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.97 | 3 days | this entry (11–0) |
| @bx66615 | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.92 | under a minute | this entry (11–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 410 of the 410 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,859 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 6 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @GTR133. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 6 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 09:09 | 184,367 | -2,741 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 18:49 | 187,108 | -1,227 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 13:46 | 188,335 | -1,711 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 15:37 | 190,046 | -854 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:31 | 190,900 | -1,381 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:01 | 192,281 | -1,537 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:19 | 193,818 | -2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:26 | 193,820 | -1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:01 | 193,821 | -3 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 18:07 | 193,824 | -114 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:19 | 193,938 | -15 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 05:21 | 193,953 | -12 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 02:29 | 193,965 | -117 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 19:11 | 194,082 | -698 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:48 | 194,780 | -515 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 02:10 | 195,295 | no change |
| 31 Oct 2026, 23:55 | 195,295 | -108 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 16:18 | 195,403 | -193 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:47 | 195,596 | -614 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:55 | 196,210 | first reading |
2,001 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 160 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 36 of 783 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,001 (7 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 27,739 |
| Reactions total | 28 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 09:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 297 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
32 reactions across 31 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 71.9% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 21.9% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.13% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 3.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 3 October 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 14 of 783 posts held from the last 30 days (1.79%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#群友投稿：想说一说柬埔寨当下真实的处境。 我师弟当时只是在西哈努克太子寰宇看房，却被拦下带走，属于无辜被羁押。没有审问，没有告知关押理由，一开始就索要高额赎金。一关就是25天，之后又被送到金边芒果三号安置点。 安置点物价极高，一顿饭就要几十美金。好好一个正常出行的人，遭遇这样的事情，谁看了不心寒？这样的情况，以后谁还敢安心来柬埔寨？ 现在开始把中国人当日本人整了吗？真是辣鸡！ 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 大事件很多盘总都在玩的一个平台 强力推荐秒出 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 电子超高爆率 免费旋转 福利天花板 包出款 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @jpzso 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
#群友投稿：在印尼的朋友注意了，近期移民局一直查证。昨天晚上移民局又过来查证件，前晚上也是。最近连着抽查三次了。 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡全网PG电子最高爆奖率 信誉老台 首存送8888u 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 爱拼才会赢 运气爆棚 满注一拉 单局斩获93万U ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @jpzso 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
金边周五起禁飞风筝和无人机！ 为迎接11月13日至17日举行的法语国家组织峰会，金边市政府宣布，峰会期间全市禁止放飞风筝及未经授权操作无人机。部分道路将实施停车限制和交通管制。 据柬埔寨首相洪玛奈透露，届时将有20多个国家的总统或总理出席，法国总统马克龙也确认于11月14日至16日访问柬埔寨。 柬埔寨警方将部署近2万名警力，并已在金边及德崇国际机场开展车队安保演练。 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ 开元实力 毋庸置疑! 随便来操! 你敢赢我敢赔 😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀0风控0审核 PG大水 放心玩 放心赢 放心提 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @jpzso 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
美国如何揭开柬埔寨洗钱网络的秘密？ 洪森政府持续保持沉默，未能对跨国犯罪网络和网络诈骗网站展开初步调查，这反映了体制性问题以及政治权力与黑钱之间的利益纠葛。 迄今为止，尽管国际机构和外国政府不断提供线索和调查报告，例如联合国人权事务高级专员办事处（人权高专办）2023年8月发布的报告估计，至少有10万人在柬埔寨的诈骗网站上遭受人权侵犯和强迫劳动，但柬埔寨国家当局仍然无所作为。 造成这种软弱的主要原因是，像太子集团这样的大型犯罪网络通过在房地产、酒店、银行和物流等领域数十亿美元的投资，已经深入渗透到正规经济体系中，因此，这些网络的瓦解或瓦解将直接损害国内经济稳定和权贵阶层的收入来源。 此外，犯罪网络的高层领导人伪装成商业巨头或战略投资者，向国家基金、社会事业和基础设施捐赠数百万美元，以换取政治影响力和法律保护。然而，核实资金来源和真实所有权的机制仍然不足，使得主管当局难以甚至无法干预此类资金来源。 洪森政府经常以行政借口…
😀😀😀😀🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 😀😀😀😀😀 1️⃣😀😀😀😀 平台优势：特码49倍 开盘时间：开奖日12:00整 😀 加拿大28 😀 平台优势：加拿大满赔 开奖频率：全天395期 开盘时间：首期开奖时间不固定，依官方开奖时间为主 😀😀😀 😄😄😄😀😀😀😀😀😀 强势启航，集团背书，信誉担保，全网首发，引领彩票娱乐新纪元！ 😀😀😀1️⃣1️⃣ 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 贵宾会彩票，合营代理，自主赚赔，独立后台，佣金周结，层级保护，官方零接触用户 😀😀😀😀😀 @GBH750CC 😀😀😀😀😀 @GBH750 😀😀😀😀😀 750.cc
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🥰😎😎😎😎🛍😎😎😎🥰可查验 🥰东南亚大事件担保300万U🥰可查验 😀【金边娱乐城】长期储备资金10亿U，全网上押担保，资金有保障！每月推广费高达300万U+，打造全网U投综合盘N0.1 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀 😀 首存送 复存送 充值笔笔赠送3% 嫩模空姐女优空降 彩金大奖88888等你来拿! 🥰 狗庄落泪：东南亚神秘玩家打电子仅用300U爆140万U 秒出款 🥰 天选之人：柬埔寨狗推仅用返水4U炸了满倍10万U 秒出款 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀选对品牌，出款稳，福利好，反水高，盘总大哥首选盘口，电子超大水 电子真人 0审核0风控 包出款。 😀官方客服： @JBkefu8 😀官方招商： @JBDL6 😀官方频道： @JBZS0 🥰官方飞投： @JB088bot 😀官方网址： jb866.vip
#网友投稿：今天在柬埔寨金边大使馆办事，看到对面有汇旺维权的，还有柬埔寨警方拍照，汇旺莫非还有希望恢复！ 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎储备金3亿U 大胆创 上押担保300万美金 8⃣🔤🔤🔤亿级域名 上押担保300万美金 实力派 数字够短 品牌够大 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @jpzso 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
#老挝新闻：万象再端2处网络犯罪窝点！9名中国人被抓，手机电脑全部查扣！ 11月11日消息，老挝公安部特别行动组近日在首都万象连续突查两处涉嫌网络犯罪的出租屋，共控制10名外国人，包括9名中国人和1名缅甸人。现场查获18部手机、1台台式电脑及1台笔记本电脑。 两处窝点均藏身普通出租住宅，分别位于万象西萨达纳县的Sang Heuy村和塔考村ASEAN Villa别墅。警方目前已控制全部涉案人员，正进一步调查其是否涉及电信诈骗、网络赌博等违法活动。 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 大事件很多盘总都在玩的一个平台 强力推荐秒出 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 电子超高爆率 免费旋转 福利天花板 包出款 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @jpzso 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
网友投稿：婊子配狗天长地久 原来这话是真的 事情发生在2025年12月底，有一个拉丝海马外号阿豪的狗推欠我钱，联系不上了，我就找朋友打听，不打听不知道，这个人不光欠我钱，他还欠华龙饭店1千多U京猫超市3千多U，蜀湘居一千多U还有Ajman炮房小姐2000迪拉姆， 现在在拉丝海马别墅做诈骗，偷窃公司资源，身边还有一个女的，之前在龙城做外围的，此人丧心病狂，这个女的曾经和他表弟在一起，因为他表弟当时赚了第一桶金，大概有80万左右，这个吸毒狗还赌钱，没有钱了，每次以各种方式借钱骗钱，因为次数太多，表弟不给了，就让这个出来卖的合谋骗他表弟的钱， 最傻逼的是，东阳贩毒运货到中国，他让他朋友收款码去接收，结果人被抓了，现在国内警察也在找他朋友和东阳，国内对于毒品零容忍，更何况300个东西， 哎回国自首吧 以上所说内容真实，不信可以去问问上面的人，这是他的照片，也请大家注意防范 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— …
#马来西亚资讯：警方销毁7445件涉案证物！总价值逾119万令吉，186台比特币矿机遭压毁 马来西亚雪兰莪州警方于11月11日在梳邦再也警区总部举行涉案证物销毁行动，共销毁7445件涉案物品，涉及210宗案件，总价值达119万1901令吉。 此次行动由雪州总警长拿督沙兹里主持。被销毁的证物来自2021年至2026年期间警方侦办的案件，涉及非法赌博、网络赌博、非法娱乐场所、比特币挖矿、走私烟酒、电缆盗窃及其他刑事犯罪。 根据警方公布的数据，210宗案件包括56宗非法赌博案、42宗非法娱乐场所案、11宗比特币挖矿案、22宗走私烟酒案、7宗网络赌博案、7宗电缆盗窃案，以及65宗其他刑事案件。 此次销毁的证物包括145部手机、332台电脑及相关设备、186台比特币矿机、36捆失窃电缆、3374瓶烈酒、1500罐酒类饮料、822箱香烟、21件娱乐场所相关物品，以及1029件其他刑事证物。 警方表示，此次行动已获得莎阿南推事庭批准…
#马来西亚资讯：吉打移民局突袭建筑工地，30名外籍人员被捕，涉及孟加拉、缅甸及印尼籍 11月10日上午，马来西亚吉打州移民局展开名为 Ops Sapu 的执法行动，突袭位于双溪大年 Bandar Amanjaya 的一处建筑工地，对现场49名外籍及本地人员进行身份检查。 行动中，执法人员共扣留30名涉嫌违反移民法令的外籍人员，其中包括17名孟加拉国籍、12名缅甸籍及1名印尼籍人员。据悉，被扣留人员包括27名男性及3名女性，年龄介于20岁至50岁之间。 行动结束后，30名被捕人员被送往 Belantik 移民拘留中心，以接受进一步调查及处理。有关部门将继续调查涉案人员是否涉及违反马来西亚移民法令。 此次行动再次体现马来西亚移民执法部门持续加强对外籍劳工及非法居留人员的检查力度。 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄老牌品质之选 信誉至上 煮酒论英雄 广告论实力 😀😀😀😝😒😤😣🧐 U盘别…
柬埔寨和土耳其军队深化防务合作 今天，柬埔寨王家军总司令翁比塞在金边会见土耳其武官乌斯上校。双方就落实今年10月洪玛奈总理访土期间签署的军事协议，重点探讨在人才培养、反恐、打击跨国及网络犯罪、军工和联合军演等领域的合作。 翁比塞提议土方在金边设立常驻武官处（现驻河内），土方表示将转达高层研究。此外，翁比塞还通报了柬泰边境局势，重申柬方坚持依据国际法和双边协议和平解决争端，坚决反对以武力改变边界。 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎储备金3亿U 大胆创 上押担保300万美金 8⃣🔤🔤🔤亿级域名 上押担保300万美金 实力派 数字够短 品牌够大 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @jpzso 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,001 posts we hold for @jpzso. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚大事件 东南亚新闻 东南亚曝光” (@jpzso), 184,367 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jpzso.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.