Channel
@nanopearl
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
15,321subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001077834314 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nanopearl |
| Description | Ювелирное бюро MNDLVCH — Надя @jeweleditor Катя @probirkina Заметки о драгоценностях и украшения с самоцветами по индивидуальному заказу. https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67ac70763c3e6d7843a2c21e |
| Created | 23 September 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nanopearl |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 15,321 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 15,322 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 15,320 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 15,325 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 15,331 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 15,333 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 15,335 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:20 | 15,336 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:20 | 15,336 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (30 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 85,030 |
| Reactions total | 3,547 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,439 reactions across 27 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 99.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,416 | 99.3% | |
| 💩 | 23 | 0.669% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,547reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Роскошный африканский рассветно-закатный турмалин. Попросите к нему бриллиантовую дорожку и ни в чем себе не отказывайте. В ближайшие два года будет всплеск интереса к турмалинам. Это видно и по высоким ювелирным коллекциям, и по движухе в маркетинге на b2b рынка. Все подорожает. Да, опять😅 Мы будем держаться до последнего во славу Хозяйки Медной горы. А этот зайчик вообще посчитан как в 2023 году: выгодно достался…
❤53
Винтажный Stantos для женщины, у которой #всепотихоньку Я очень люблю в этой модел восьмиугольность. И золото на стали так классно работает с кремовым циферблатом... Три айфона <3 @jeweleditor
❤59
Главный бонусы работы в Дубае — хорошие, очень хорошие предложения по бриллиантам. Обнаружила, что соскучилась по классике. Повальная мода на «только не круглый!» среди клиентов читающих и интересничающих здорово очистила мое восприятие красоты камня. И вся эта история про идеальную симметрию и идеальную огранку сейчас помогает мне смотреть и думать: «Господи, как красиво!» Бонус: крупные бриллиантовые круги, купл…
❤92
Прелесть цирконов — в алмазной дисперсии. Они дорого работают со светом. Шпинель так не умеет. Сапфиры так не умеют. Розовый циркон здесь — большой мой любимец. Отличный союз персикового и розового. Нижний камень работает деликатнее, это акварель. Очень древняя акварель, возраст цирконов превышает три миллиарда лет. Прекрасные будут кольца! Пишите Кате: @probirkina
❤122
Это роскошный оранжевый циркон! Внимательный читатель заметит, что мы начали делать кольца «Полоз» без камней. Оба лота можно обсудить с Катей: @probirkina
❤87
Вы уже сто раз прочитали везде, что ламповый контент, который сохраняет ощущение ручного труда и непривлечения генеративного ИИ — будет престижным. Но я еще раз про это напишу. Простые человеческие рисунки. Старая-добрая анимация. Где? На сайте легендарной марки, которая давно и успешно делает понятные, приятные, красивые и престижные вещи для богатых людей.
❤115
Умоляю, даже если вы не собираетесь покупать ни Kelly, ни лак для ногтей, зайдите на обновленный сайт Hermes. Там прямо красота. Бренд снова поддерживает независимое искусство. Картинки нарисовала иллюстратор Сара Мартинон, а Арман Беро их заанимировал. Теперь лошадка путешествует от раздела к разделу в поисках самых выгодных предложений:)).
❤105💩5
Красные шпинели — это дорого и круто. Умно, изысканно и на века. Обсудите их с @probirkina Со мной обсуждаем изумруды, бриллианты, крупный жемчуг: @jeweleditor
❤52
Выкрутасы Виктуар де Кастеллан в Dior и Клэр Шуан в Boucheron пару раз в год вводят меня в мрачное самокопание. Но в этот раз мне чуть легче, мы сделали Серьёзные Фантазийные Серьги с красной шпинелью и желтыми сапфирами по мотивам детальки, над которой я несколько лет размышляла как творец, а не как харизматичная лавочница. Пора учиться на ювелирного художника и технолога, чтобы через четверть века исполнять как сл…
❤258💩5
Самые дорогие и самые изысканные драгоценные фенечки. Я примерно представляю себе клиентуру Dior Joaillerie ценника 75k+ Они все эти опаловые облака с руками оторвут. И будут правы. Секси-искусство. Драгоценное!
❤120
И вот она все это цветастое выше согласовала с начальством. Ей наверняка тогда осторожно напомнили про рекоммендации стороннего консалтинга сделать еще Просто Бриллиантовые Мощные Вещи для Эмиратов и Вокруг. И она такая «блииин, ну ладно…» И вот эту парюру за неделю придумала. К бабке не ходи — все так и было. Великая женщина! И ей всего 64 года. Поцветет еще нам, посияет.
❤171
Вот как надо работать. Сколько сегодня людей подумает «опять ИИ» про вещи из выскокой летней коллекции драгоценности Diorissima? А это просто Виктуар во всей своей мощи. Знатокам хорошо видно здесь все, что она показывала вне Dior в конце 2000х в подружаечных галереях в Лондоне.
❤185
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @nanopearl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@nanopearl edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 169,711 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Наножемчуг” (@nanopearl), 15,321 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nanopearl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.