Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 53 days, net -997. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51,548–52,845 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Sept 2026, 04:00
51,698
-158
17 Sept 2026, 20:57
51,856
-4
15 Sept 2026, 17:55
51,860
-44
14 Sept 2026, 03:36
51,904
-37
12 Sept 2026, 12:00
51,941
-24
10 Sept 2026, 05:55
51,965
-104
6 Sept 2026, 22:01
52,069
-42
4 Sept 2026, 05:22
52,111
-66
2 Sept 2026, 18:17
52,177
-31
1 Sept 2026, 19:26
52,208
+2
31 Aug 2026, 16:23
52,206
-30
30 Aug 2026, 18:23
52,236
-21
29 Aug 2026, 17:03
52,257
-18
28 Aug 2026, 20:37
52,275
+7
27 Aug 2026, 20:46
52,268
-39
26 Aug 2026, 19:13
52,307
-18
25 Aug 2026, 21:52
52,325
+6
24 Aug 2026, 22:03
52,319
-39
23 Aug 2026, 06:34
52,358
-34
21 Aug 2026, 18:47
52,392
first reading
Engagement
191 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
32.6%
avg views ÷ 51,698 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,800
92 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
98
of 191 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held
191 (3 August 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total
1,549,040
Reactions total
18,843
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
1 Oct 2026, 06:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈12,100
Videos
≈3,210
Links
≈13,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 46m
Average length
1m 50s
Measured directly from 58 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
37,699 reactions across 181 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
24,980
66.3%
👍
4,719
12.5%
❤🔥
2,706
7.18%
🕊
1,298
3.44%
😢
1,174
3.11%
💯
651
1.73%
😇
395
1.05%
🥰
303
0.804%
🤗
229
0.607%
🔥
220
0.584%
😭
184
0.488%
⚡
136
0.361%
✍
104
0.276%
🎉
100
0.265%
🏆
98
0.26%
👏
94
0.249%
😍
77
0.204%
🫡
60
0.159%
🤩
25
0.066%
🍓
22
0.058%
13 further kinds
124
0.329%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 181 of the 191 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37,699 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 191 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 181 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @muslimaatuz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 191 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 1 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
«Билармидингиз?»
❓ Бугун биз учун оддий бўлган мактаб, дарслик ва замонавий ўқитиш усуллари бир аср аввал Туркистонда катта янгилик бўлганини билармидингиз?
❓Жадид маърифатпарварлари таълим соҳасида қандай янгиликларга асос солган?
🤲Илм ва маърифат йўлида фидойилик қилган марҳум уламоларимизни ва устозларимизни Аллоҳ ўз раҳматига олсин, эзгу ишларини даргоҳида қабул қилсин. Бизларга уларнинг илми ва меросига муно…
Азиз устозлар ва мурабиийлар!
Барчангизни шарафли ва қутлуғ айём — Устоз ва мураббийлар куни билан самимий муборакбод этамиз!
Сизлар бор экансиз, қалбларда илмга муҳаббат, эзгуликка ишонч ва келажакка умид сўнмайди. Сизлар ёққан маърифат чироғи авлоддан авлодга ўтиб, инсонлар қалбини ёритаверади, жоҳиллик ва нодонлик зулматига қарши нур бўлиб хизмат қилаверади.
Сизларнинг ҳар бир насиҳатингиз, ҳар бир ўргатган саб…
Кўпчилик дунёни кўзлари билан кўради. Мен эса ҳаётни қалб кўзи билан ҳис қилишга ҳаракат қиламан.
Чунки баъзан кўз илғамаган нарсаларни қалб сезади. Қалб билан қаралганда эса ҳаётнинг асл ранглари, инсонларнинг меҳри ва бор неъматларнинг қадри янада яққолроқ сезилади.
«Ҳиммат»нинг навбатдаги меҳмони билан бўлиб ўтган самимий суҳбатни ўтказиб юборманг.
🎥 Бу суҳбатда ҳаётга қалб кўзи билан қараш, матонат ва инсон қа…
Сизнинг таълимингиз олмаган ким бор?
Сиз-ку юракларда илк зиё ёққан!
Олимми, шоирми ва ё санъаткор –
Илк бор сизга томон устоз деб боққан...
Байрамингиз муборак бўлсин, азиз устозлар!
😀@Muslimaatuz
❓Буржларга қараб башорат қилинса, унга ишониш мумкинми?
💬 ЖАВОБ: Бисмиллаҳир роҳманир роҳим. Йўқ, буржларнинг инсон тақдирига алоқаси бор деб ҳисоблаш асло мумкин эмас. Аллоҳ сақласин, бундай эътиқод инсонни диндан чиқиб қолишига сабаб бўлади. Ислом шариатида буржларга, юлдузлар башоратига ишониш, улар орқали келажакни билишга уриниш ёки инсон тақдири ва феъл-атворини юлдузлар белгилайди, деб эътиқод қилиш қатъиян б…
Ассалому алайкум ва роҳматуллоҳи ва барокатуҳ
Бугун чоршанба
— 30 Сентябрь 2026
— 19 Робиьус соний 1448
Байрамингиз муборак бўлсин, азиз устозлар!🌹
"Ҳақиқатдан ҳам ҳар бир талаба ота-онаси ва жамият томонидан устознинг қўлига топширилган буюк омонатдир. Бу борада устознинг зиммасига улкан масъулият юклатилган бўлади. Устоз талаба шахсиятининг шаклланиши, фикрларининг ўсиши, нафсининг тарбияланиши, илм олиши, маър…
Болаликда койигани учун ранжиймиз.
Талаб қилганида тушунмаймиз.
Мактабдан кетишга эса шошиламиз…
Кейин йиллар ўтади.
Бир куни ҳаётнинг ўзи биздан устозимиз талаб қилган нарсаларни талаб қила бошлайди. Шунда ортга қараб, ўша танбеҳлар ортида меҳр, ўша талаблар ортида эса бизнинг келажагимиз учун қайғурган қалб борлигини англаймиз.
Устознинг айрим сўзлари дарс тугаши билан эмас, йиллар ўтиб тушунилар экан…
Ва бир ку…
Умр — сабр билан босиб ўтилган йўл
Баъзи аёллар умр йўлини бировнинг елкасига суяниб эмас, ўз сабрига таяниб босиб ўтадилар. Уларнинг ҳаётида айтилмаган гаплар, ҳеч ким билмаган курашлар бўлади...
Зеро, аёлнинг сабри — унинг ожизлиги эмас, балки қалбидаги кучнинг ифодасидир. Баъзан бир умрлик ҳаёт — бир умрлик сабр, бир умрлик кураш ва ҳеч кимга билдирилмаган дарддан иборат бўлади.
Ҳар бир сокин нигоҳ ортида бир ҳ…
Ассалому алайкум ва роҳматуллоҳи ва барокатуҳ
Бугун сешанба
— 29 Сентябрь 2026
— 18 Робиьус соний 1448
📃 БУГУНГИ ишни эртага қолдирманг. Унутманг, эртанинг ҳам ўз иши бор. Эртанинг ишлари бугунги ишларни бажаришингизга халал беради, барчасини бажаришга ургурмай қоласиз. Ўз вақтида қилинган иш ҳар томонлама фойдалидир.
🤲Аллоҳим, Сендан вақтларимизга барака, фойдали илм, қабул бўлувчи амал ва пок ризқ сўраймиз!
😀@M…
Ал-Муҳсий
Аллоҳ таоло ал-Муҳсий — барча нарсани ҳисобга олувчи ва ҳеч бир нарса У Зотга махфий бўлмаган Зотдир.
У ҳар бир нафасимизни, амалларимизни, сўзларимизни ва қалбимиздаги ниятларимизни билади.
Инсон санай олмайдиган нарсаларни ҳам Аллоҳ таоло мукаммал билади ва ҳисобга олади.
#Asmoul_husna
😀@Muslimaatuz
❤164👍37🤗9🕊3😇3❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 191 posts we hold for @muslimaatuz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@muslimaatuz edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
arabic.uz (hikmatlar) @arabicuz · 37,927 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 31 August 2026
MARIIYAM MAHMUDOVA @mariiyammahmudovauz · 63,422 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 21 August 2026
Beautylish_uz☘️ @beautylish_uz · 21,084 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 25 September 2026
Hasanxon Yahyo Abdulmajid | Rasmiy @hasanxondomlauz · 56,678 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 August 2026
Zairzade (Islom psixologiyasi) @zairzadee · 48,642 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 26 August 2026
Mehrob.uz @mehrob_uz · 223,211 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 August 2026
𝙍𝙀𝙏𝙎𝙀𝙋𝙏.𝙐𝙕 @pishiriqlarr_salatlar_pazandalik · 47,932 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 29 August 2026
. @MubashshirAhmad · 30,873 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
FARZAND TARBIYASI 🌙 @bola_tarbiyasi · 48,602 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 26 August 2026
Audio kitob | Huda uz @audiokitoblar_islom · 53,978 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Muslimaat.uz” (@muslimaatuz), 51,698 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/muslimaatuz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.