Channel
@mtzbkjmm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002301379879 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mtzbkjmm |
| Created | 27 February 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mtzbkjmm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 11 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 10 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 10 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 27 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (27 February 2025 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 27 February 2025 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢体育|热血|橄榄球🏈 📢万利网址 万利注册 PA... 📢【木头】贷款实时数据｜D... 📢万利网址 万利注册 PA... 📢不良林 📢棋牌|牌友|麻将|牌技|... 📢138彩票信用网🅰️亚... 📢老司机偷拍街射福利91 📢深喉-口交-吞精 📢趴赛上门 帕塞上门 📢🎥日本AV|中文字幕|... 📢军事前沿|尖端武器|秘密... 📢自说自话的总裁 📢环球360代理 环球36... 📢十一怪谈|都市传说|奇闻... 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢 X-panel 一站式拉人增粉平台 📢⚽️爱博体育-佣金55%-玩家首存即升VIP7等级⚽️ 📢✅金边娱乐城✅全网上押800万u盘总聚集地 📢182体育 2026世界杯指定投注平台、 免实名、不限ip、u存u提无上限 📢 TeleTop 中文索引 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管…
Signed 速搜流量助手
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢沙贝 📢骚货小妹妹多种道具轮流裸... 📢大其力/缅北诈骗/爆料吃... 📢吉隆坡上门 吉隆坡外围 📢果子 📢🔰云吞导航频道🔰 📢知识分享|涨见识|生活|... 📢圣淘沙娱乐🦩 📢Telegram 中文知... 📢欧博代理 亚星代理 欧博... 📢线实体真人视讯百家乐 p... 📢Yuvutu 📢足球下注 世界杯买球 世... 📢小蕾 ∎ KuiGus 📢米瑟丽 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢💹567U时代火爆上线！招收玩家/代理，匿名开户，放心娱乐！ 📢💎85.CC电子百家乐0审核包出款支持汇旺提U 🥇西湖娱乐城✅老品牌包出款✅出款超10亿U 📢🔰开元官方🔥代理70%|电子棋牌|AG百家乐 📢 TeleTop 中文索引 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管理员，即可在2000+频道进行互推曝光，实现订阅快速增长。
Signed 速搜流量助手
来自Ton流量小助手推荐 📢小野 ☔️ 📢汽车资讯|奔驰|宝马 📢雪柔儿 📢koi 历史爱好者 📢红浪漫全国外围空降包养资... 📢手绘|图片|近距离|高清... 📢美食攻略|教你做|馋哭了... 📢Caravan中文剧场 📢币盘合约 外汇 商城🔥... 📢虔旅倌 📢性爱巴士 — 荐片会总部... 📢小Lin说|coco哥|... 📢二爷故事 📢台灣達人秀娱乐吃瓜八卦美... 📢xj 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢开云 九游 体育 大发 PG 皇冠 百家乐 📢 X-panel 一站式拉人增粉平台 📢Telegram广告投放平台 📢小夜数据🔥一手源头 📢IM体育官方招商频道 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管理员，即可在2000+频道进行互推曝光，实现订阅快速增长。
Signed Ton流量小助手
777
查看 极搜互推：https://t.me/hutui1bot
❤3
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @mtzbkjmm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 472,996 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 38 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“美团众包科技” (@mtzbkjmm), 11 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mtzbkjmm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.