Channel
@jilongpodydfigk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
180subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002775337776 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jilongpodydfigk |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jilongpodydfigk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 180 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:31 | 177 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 177 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (6 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 87 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢万利平台 PA平台 万利... 📢百家乐代理 欧博百家乐 ... 📢Lisa :D 快讯小助... 📢长青~中国传统文化 📢欧博官网 亚星官网 皇冠... 📢反差 母狗 荡妇 📢秀人网 模特 中出 📢母狗茶馆 📢百家乐代理 欧博百家乐 ... 📢体育赛事 世界杯赛事 足... 📢憨人疼天宫 📢赌场真人实体现场视讯平台 📢【斌子】贷款实时数据｜D... 📢👑嫩逼熟女👑淫妻抖音... 📢皇冠网盘｜皇冠体育私网｜... 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 🥇西湖娱乐城✅老品牌包出款✅出款超10亿U 📢🔰开元官方🔥代理70%|电子棋牌|AG百家乐 📢182体育 2026世界杯指定投注平台、 免实名、不限ip、u存u提无上限 📢专业Telegram账号交易平台🔥热门社交媒体账号交易 📢球速体育相信品牌的力量、老品牌值得信赖、不限ip、免实名。 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonG…
https://t.me/rtyivbnmij11
近期因为有人冒充潇湘阁修车 新老客户有上当 我们修改了联系方式 尽量避免再被模仿 和 减少新老客户上当 😍 菲-泰-等..国 (助理) ：@XXGE8 🥰 新-马-等..国（助理）：@XXGE888 @lxl168 此号将慢慢不再接待 ⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️ 近期有冒仿着 下单请认准 此频道联系人 助理 ❤️ 认 准 👆 ↑ 上方三个 ⚠️⚠️⚠️除此以外 都是假的
Nini 02 167 98 双一流研究生 可纯可御 开朗性格好 真🐻D 1-2小时 1次 5000马币 8小时2次 直✌️8500马币 10小时2次➕陪酒✌️9500马币 留下免上门费
艺名:喵喵C01 产地：越南🇻🇳 年纪：25 身高：165 体重：100 胸围：D真胸 是否有生育：无 是否会喝酒：会 是否会嗨：会 是否会服务：会 口爆，69是否可以：可以 45分钟1次 700 90分钟2次 1000 8小时4次 3000 上门+100 偏远另算
短期逗留 提前预约 其他照片视频 咨询经纪人 身高167。体重100斤。胸F 60分钟一次1500 90分钟二次2500 6 小时 小包夜5000 12小时大包夜8000
林一 170.50kg 真🐻模特艺术生 1-2小时 1次 5000马币 8小时2次 直✌️8500马币 10小时2次➕陪酒✌️9500马币 留下免上门费
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @jilongpodydfigk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 418,729 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 46 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@jilongpodydfigk named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“吉隆坡上门 吉隆坡外围” (@jilongpodydfigk), 180 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jilongpodydfigk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.