Channel
@KoI_Chinese
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
40subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002286174646 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KoI_Chinese |
| Description | 知之爲知之，不知爲不知，是知也。 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KoI_Chinese |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 40 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 40 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 10 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (10 April 2025 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 18 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2025 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢【猩猩】贷款实时数据｜D... 📢皇冠代理 皇冠体育 皇冠... 📢南宫集团-壹号国际-PG... 📢查档/科学上网等资料分享 📢米瑟丽 📢兰兰 paradox 📢【R%精品】麻豆精选 📢利博代理 利博百家乐 利... 📢自慰 福利姬 📢腾龙官方直营-新盛百家乐... 📢懒懒iris🇨🇳🇨... 📢🏅速搜官方🏅｜🔥反... 📢河内幸运5🎉 📢欧博官网 亚星官网 欧博... 📢黑丝AV中出无码日本AV 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢 Ton 中文索引 📢182体育 2026世界杯指定投注平台、 免实名、不限ip、u存u提无上限 📢💎 【8.cc】U投领导者 千万域名 百亿大盘 充值笔笔加赠3% 📢 X-panel 一站式拉人增粉平台 📢⚽️注册送138🧧百家乐/棋牌/电竞体育信誉平台 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管理员，即
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢皇冠代理 皇冠体育 皇冠... 📢【新盛娱乐】改单皇冠】❤... 📢MV·翻唱 📢萝莉🎀少女🎀学生🎀... 📢缅甸赌场-新盛赌场-泰国... 📢祺依然 📢NANA|韩国美女|内衣... 📢泰国.曼谷.芭提雅.包养... 📢动画|搞笑|篮球🏀 📢浩哥频道|未解之谜|外星... 📢利博私网 利博包杀 利博... 📢环球追奇🏅 📢缅甸赌场-环球国际-欧亚... 📢有点意思|中国文化|历史... 📢开云体育 米兰体育 电竞... 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢 X Panel 商店 [主营：苹果ID] 📢💎85.CC电子百家乐0审核包出款支持汇旺提U 📢 全网最全面、最便宜的自助引流服务 📢💎 【8.cc】U投领导者 千万域名 百亿大盘 充值笔笔加赠3% 📢182体育 2026世界杯指定投注平台、 免实名、不限ip、u存u提无上限 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGr…
来自Ton流量小助手推荐 📢笑一笑 十年少 📢野外生存|荒野求生|狩猎... 📢历史杂谈|资本论 📢國家地理 Nationa... 📢仙子紫霞 📢佛山修车 佛山外围 佛山... 📢主播私享👙 📢【凡人文化】频道总览 📢❤️美女|翻唱|有颜有才... 📢三立iNEWS 📢曦之月 📢H.X.N 📢搞笑|爆笑|开心|每日一... 📢綜藝大熱門 Hot Do... 📢实事_求知_知性_群英会 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢专业Telegram账号交易平台🔥热门社交媒体账号交易 📢 Ton 中文索引 📢摩根体育官方招商 55%佣金分红 📢 X Panel 商店 [主营：苹果ID] 📢蕾丝舞社官方频道 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管理员，即可在2000+频道进行互推曝光，实现订阅快速增长。
❤1
koi 历史爱好者 pinned a photo
🎉 X-Panel | 海外社交媒体账号出售 💋 购买账号➡️上粉包装➡️推广引流 一战搞定 ❤️🔥 Telegram协议号全网最全，纯一手号，质量硬，带量来谈！！ 👉Twitter、Facebook、Ins、苹果id、海外邮箱....... 欢迎带量咨询~ 🌐官方网站 🔰账号交易 👩🏻💻联系客服
明
Korea
新军
黄龙旗
想啊，很想啊！（指北伐）
太平天国
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @KoI_Chinese. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 410,359 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 35 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@KoI_Chinese named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“koi 历史爱好者” (@KoI_Chinese), 40 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KoI_Chinese.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.