Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мослекторий

Channel

Мослекторий

@moslectory

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,935subscribers

+38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002030433374
TypeChannel
Username@moslectory
DescriptionМослекторий - просветительский проект для тех, кто любит думать. Наши лекции о последних трендах в науке, искусстве, литературе, культуре, музыке и не только. Проект создан при поддержке Департамента СМИ и рекламы города Москвы
Created19 October 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/moslectory

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,8666,9356,900.56 August 2026 — 6,897 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,897 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,894 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,891 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,890 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,891 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,883 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,885 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,876 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,871 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,866 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,867 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,870 subscribers26 September 2026 — 6,882 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,906 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,910 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,912 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,920 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,925 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,922 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,923 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,932 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,933 subscribers8 November 2026 — 6,935 subscribers6 August 20268 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 95 days, net +38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,856–6,945 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 14:396,935+2
5 Nov 2026, 00:066,933+1
2 Nov 2026, 03:116,932+9
27 Oct 2026, 06:556,923+1
24 Oct 2026, 08:406,922-3
21 Oct 2026, 03:376,925+5
18 Oct 2026, 00:446,920+8
15 Oct 2026, 02:486,912+2
11 Oct 2026, 21:206,910+4
5 Oct 2026, 08:386,906+24
26 Sept 2026, 20:596,882+12
17 Sept 2026, 11:376,870+3
13 Sept 2026, 20:176,867+1
10 Sept 2026, 09:166,866-5
4 Sept 2026, 21:416,871-5
1 Sept 2026, 06:446,876-9
26 Aug 2026, 14:056,885+2
23 Aug 2026, 22:536,883-8
19 Aug 2026, 21:426,891+1
16 Aug 2026, 18:036,890first reading

Engagement

66 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.90%
avg views ÷ 6,935 subscribers
Avg views / post
479
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 66 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held66 (2 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total17,237
Reactions total231
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 16:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,000
Videos
≈514
Links
≈2,110

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
25m 47s
Average length
1m 10s

Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

278 reactions across 53 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍11742.1%
❤9132.7%
🔥3412.2%
👏93.24%
👎82.88%
😁62.16%
🥰41.44%
😱31.08%
🎉20.719%
🤔20.719%
👀10.36%
🤯10.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 322 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 36 posts held from the last 30 days (19.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 15:47 UTC67 views3 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Иван Павлов: от сына священника до Нобелевской премии Иван Павлов — первый русский лауреат Нобелевской премии и физиолог, чьи опыты с собаками и открытие условного рефлекса изменили нейробиологию. Сын священника, ученик Сеченова и Циона, амбидекстр и хирург, создатель «фабрики» лабораторных исследований и «башен молчания». Почему его лаборатория стала образцом разделения труда и масштабирования? Почему его идеи о на…

❤2👍1

10 Nov 2026, 13:31 UTC128 views4 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @moscowdoveriePhoto

✈️ 10 ноября 1888 года родился выдающийся авиаконструктор Андрей Туполев. Под его руководством создано более 100 типов машин, 70 из которых выпускались серийно. «Некрасивый самолёт не полетит» — эта фраза Андрея Туполева стала его девизом. Он был не просто инженером, а человеком, который умел видеть самолёт целиком — от заклёпки до силуэта. Сегодня его наследие — это не только самолёты, но и целая школа конструиро…

❤4

10 Nov 2026, 11:05 UTC167 views3 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Велосипед в VR как лекарство от депрессии Российские учёные создают медицинский VR-тренажёр для реабилитации пациентов с депрессией и посттравматическим стрессовым расстройством. Пациент надевает шлем и отправляется в виртуальную поездку на велосипеде, а система тем временем тренирует его внимание и способность принимать решения. ➡️ Как это работает: • по дороге стоят светофоры: на красный нужно остановиться, на зе…

❤2👍1

10 Nov 2026, 08:12 UTC202 views4 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

🤯 Вечности не существует? Само слово «вечность» в физике означает не бесконечность, а очень большой промежуток времени. Так что вечность — это не «навсегда», а «очень-очень долго». Человечество долго считало Вселенную вечной. Такой, у которой не было начала и не будет конца. Но сегодня мы знаем, что у нашей Вселенной есть начало. Большой взрыв — точка, дальше которой мы не можем заглянуть. Что было до него, никто н…

❤2👍1🤯1

9 Nov 2026, 17:43 UTC305 views8 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Глубины океана: давление, биолюминесценция и пластик на дне Океан изучен меньше, чем поверхность Луны. В нём живут существа, приспособленные к давлению, темноте и холоду. Рыбы-лягушки раздуваются при подъёме трала, кашалоты охотятся на гигантских кальмаров, а на дне Марианской впадины находят пластиковые пакеты и унитазы. Морской биолог, эксперт Центра морских исследований МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова Ольга Коновалов…

👍4❤3😁1

8 Nov 2026, 16:29 UTC373 views12 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

В юности Пётр I впервые увидел море — в Архангельске. То, что для его предшественников было неведомой стихией, для молодого царя стало вызовом и мечтой. Он увидел не просто воду — он увидел возможность её покорить. А кто способен укротить стихию? Только шкипер на корабле. Именно так Пётр представлял и себя, и Россию: страна — это большой корабль, а он — шкипер, ведущий её в заданном направлении. И всё в его жизни б…

👏5👍3🤔2🔥1🥰1

8 Nov 2026, 12:24 UTC366 views2 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Чтобы выйти из комнаты, нужно выбрать одну дверь. А что если попробовать пройти через две сразу? В квантовом мире — это норма. Электроны и фотоны ведут себя как настоящие волшебники: они умудряются находиться в нескольких местах одновременно и проходить сквозь две щели разом. Разрушает привычное представление о реальности кандидат физико-математических наук, руководитель научной группы в «Росатом Квантовые технолог…

❤1🥰1

7 Nov 2026, 19:23 UTC400 views11 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Почему Сталин до самого 22 июня 1941 года отказывался верить в нападение Германии? Гитлер, по его мнению, не мог решиться воевать с СССР, не разгромив сначала Англию, — ведь это означало бы войну на два фронта и потерю колоссальных поставок советской нефти и зерна. Логика, казавшаяся железной, обернулась трагедией. Мотивы Сталина разбирает доктор исторических наук, заместитель декана исторического факультета МГУ им…

👍4🔥4👎2😁1

7 Nov 2026, 12:35 UTC387 views4 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

«Теория всего»: идеал, который пока недостижим? Самая амбициозная цель физики — теория, которая описывает всё, включая гравитацию. Но она должна быть реалистичной, конечной и фальсифицируемой. Теория струн — главный кандидат сегодня — этой проверки пока не проходит. Вот в чём парадокс: теория, претендующая на объяснение всего, сама пока не может быть проверена. Как работает теория струн? Объясняет кандидат физико-…

🔥3👍1

6 Nov 2026, 16:54 UTC864 views7 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Как Тамерлану удалось создать одну из величайших империй в истории? Его боялись правители разных стран, его армия покоряла города, а сам он мечтал повторить путь Чингисхана. Как Тамерлан победил Золотую Орду и османского султана, почему не пошёл на Москву и откуда появилась легенда о проклятии его гробницы? Историк и специалист по правящим династиям Николай Полонский рассказывает о жизни Амира Тимура, его военных п…

👍6👏1

6 Nov 2026, 15:46 UTC392 views5 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

«Третий Рим» на болоте: как Петр I строил имперскую столицу Петербург при Петре Великом был не просто новым городом, а городом-символом. Петр задумывал его как «Третий Рим» — новую имперскую столицу, куда перевозили старую московскую элиту. Какой тотальный контроль ждал тех, кто захотел там поселиться? Рассказывает историк, специалист по правящим династиям Николай Полонский. 🎞️Выпуск в ВК Видео 🎞️Выпуск на YouTub…

👍3👏2

5 Nov 2026, 18:14 UTC444 views9 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Свет — это волна или частица? Казалось бы, простой вопрос, но именно он поставил науку в тупик. В одних случаях свет ведёт себя как волна, в других — как поток частиц, и ни одна из привычных теорий не может описать его целиком. О том, как человечество столкнулось с этим парадоксом, рассказывает кандидат физико-математических наук, руководитель научной группы в «Росатом Квантовые технологии» Дмитрий Чермошенцев. 🎞️…

👍6❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @moslectory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@moslectory edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 November 2026
Most recent edit
10 November 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTCAnonymous Quiz126 voters

«Богатырей» написал:

  1. Илья Репин!17%
  2. Виктор Васнецов80%
  3. Михаил Врубель3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTCAnonymous Quiz92 voters

Ну что? «Приплыли»?

  1. картину написал Илья Репин49%
  2. это картина Льва Соловьёва22%
  3. у неё вообще нет автора7%
  4. это ИИ23%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTCAnonymous Quiz98 voters

👆 Картину написал

  1. Илья Репин! Точно!50%
  2. кто-то другой50%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTCAnonymous Quiz90 voters

👆 Этот зимний пейзаж принадлежит кисти:

  1. Ивана Айвазовского14%
  2. Архипа Куинджи22%
  3. Ильи Репина37%
  4. Ивана Шишкина27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTCAnonymous Quiz96 voters

👆 Эта картина хранится в Третьяковской галерее в Москве. А написал её:

  1. Валентин Серов52%
  2. Илья Репин44%
  3. Иван Шишкин4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz87 voters

Картина «Негритянка» авторства:

  1. Михаила Врубеля49%
  2. Виктора Васнецова30%
  3. Ильи Репина21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Давай Бросать
@davaibrosat · 28,604
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 September 2026
Сортировочная
@sortirovochnaya · 24,010
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
Это Москва
@etomsk_channel · 18,602
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 October 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мослекторий” (@moslectory), 6,935 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moslectory.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.