15 Mar 2022, 14:10 UTC≈14,300 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
내일 메인 이벤트 조심합시다.
Channel
랑고랑고모랑고
@morangoisbad
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
373subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001632761458 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @morangoisbad |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 7 March 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/morangoisbad |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 373 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 373 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 7 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
14 Mar 2022, 17:14 UTC≈5,250 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
"All asset crash" 모든 자산들의 코릴레이션이 맞아떨어지지않는다. 보통 이런 순간을 폭풍전야라고 배워왔다. 어떤 방향이로든 큰 움직임이 발생할 가능성이 매우 높다. 기회가 열린다.
13 Mar 2022, 16:21 UTC≈6,250 viewsread 7 August 2026
수많은 크립토인들에게 도움이 되었으면 하며 두서없이 적어보았습니다. 감사합니다. https://twitter.com/morangojmt/status/1503043157637824519
13 Mar 2022, 06:23 UTC≈3,330 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
레이 달리오 - 변화하는 세계질서를 보면서 가장 공감했던 파트이다. 크립토맥시 중 몇몇은 결여되어있는 점이다. 차트에서도 HV이나 프랙탈에 집중하는 이유를 생각해야한다. 이 글이 불편할 몇몇은 멍거나 워렌 버핏 또한 시대에 뒤떨어진다 생각하고 욕을 했을 것이다. 그들이 지금까지 보여줬던 안목과 퍼포먼스는 무시되어진채로. 크립토가 매우 잠재력있는 미래투자자산인건 누구나 부정할 수 없다. 하지만 당장부터 크립토가 폭발적으로 가격이 오를거라는 믿음은 어디서 나오는 것인가? 지금, 거시경제 상황 속에서 크립토가 아닌매력적인 투자자산들도 매우 많다. 귀를 닫고 남들보다 앞서간다고 생각하는 것이 가장 편협한 사고이다. 필자 또한, 편협해지지않으려 항상 노력한다. 편협해지지말자.
11 Mar 2022, 14:12 UTC≈2,060 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @seaotterbtc
[크립토퀀트 퀵테이크] 좋아요 한번씩 부탁드립니다 ㅎ https://cryptoquant.com/quicktake/622b55668b46166821bf4aa0 [번역] https://t.me/seaotterbtc/5108
11 Mar 2022, 07:19 UTC≈7,550 viewsread 7 August 2026
이제부터 우리가 포커싱 해야하는 부분은 3가지 정도이다. 1. 단기적 금리인상 변수 예상 확률이 0%에 수렴한다고 해도 결국 정하는 것은 FED이다. 예상 확률이 0%라는 의미는 시장이 예상하지 못하고 있다는 뜻이고, 모두의 예상을 깨고 50bp 인상이 나온다면 시장은 단기적으로 매우 놀랄것이다. 하지만, 25bp가 나온다면 4월 CPI가 나오기 전까지는 시장에 순풍이 불어올 가능성도 다분하다. 2. 지정학적 리스크 푸틴은 러-우 사태가 터지기 전부터, 금을 지속적으로 매입해왔다. 이는 심플하게 생각해봐도 이번 사태를 쉽게 끝내지 않는다는 것을 의미한다. 이 덕분에 유럽의 물가지수와 국채금리가 미쳐날뛰고있다. 라가르드는 언제까지 현재와 같은 스탠스를 유지할 수 있을까? EU가 한 나라가 아닌 연합이기 때문에 상황이 더욱 복잡해지고 있…
11 Mar 2022, 07:19 UTC≈9,560 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
한달 전까지만 해도, 3월 금리인상 25bp 가능성이 50.8% 3월 금리인상 50bp 가능성이 49.2% 였다. 반반이였다. 하지만 러-우 전쟁이 터지면서 공급망 차질이 생기고 상하원 청문회에서 파월이 3월은 25bp 인상을 시행할 예정이라고 한 후, 3월 50bp 인상 확률이 0에 수렴했다. 어제 근원 CPI가 높게 나왔음에도 불구하고 50bp 인상은 여전히 0%에 수렴하는 중이다.
10 Mar 2022, 14:15 UTC≈3,030 viewsread 7 August 2026
🇺🇸More broad-based #inflation heat in Feb 🔥#CPI +0.8% 🟡Core CPI +0.5% ⚡️Energy +3.5% (gas +6.6%) 🍲Food +1.0% 🔥Goods +1.3% 🚗New cars +0.3% ⤴️Used cars -0.2% 👕Apparel +0.7% 🔥Services +0.5% 🏠Shelter +0.5% ⤴️Airfare +5.2% ⤴️Car rental +3.5% ⤴️Hotels +2.5% 🏥Medic +0.1%
10 Mar 2022, 13:42 UTC≈2,590 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
약 반년간 Core CPI 상승을 보시길 속지맙시다. 예상치가 부합하더라도 우리는 대인플레시대 속에 살고있습니다.
10 Mar 2022, 09:53 UTC≈2,890 viewsread 7 August 2026
중국은 루블화 대비 위안화 거래 폭을 5%에서 10%로 확대했다. 1강 체제에서 2강 체제가 되기위한 발걸음.
9 Mar 2022, 13:12 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @fireant_crypto
https://twitter.com/ftx_official/status/1501543323516895235?s=21 C2X FTX IEO 컴투스코인 ftx ieo감
8 Mar 2022, 16:48 UTC≈1,880 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
지금의 시계열을 어느 시대와 비교해야할까요? 16, 18년 금리인상, QT 시계열은 절대 아닐겁니다. https://twitter.com/morangojmt
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @morangoisbad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,109,710 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“랑고랑고모랑고” (@morangoisbad), 373 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/morangoisbad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.