Онлайн-школа для родителей детей 0-6 лет
Курсы: https://t.me/montessori_children/4118
Связаться с нами: @montessori_help_bot
Регистрация в РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67e66c6cf030015ba82ec5e2
Регистрация как оператора ПД: 76-25-011615
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net -511. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,544–36,618 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 04:38
35,673
+5
6 Nov 2026, 02:49
35,668
-23
5 Nov 2026, 00:17
35,691
-20
4 Nov 2026, 02:59
35,711
-24
3 Nov 2026, 00:46
35,735
-24
2 Nov 2026, 01:20
35,759
-22
1 Nov 2026, 03:26
35,781
-7
31 Oct 2026, 03:58
35,788
-18
30 Oct 2026, 01:48
35,806
-28
29 Oct 2026, 02:44
35,834
-15
27 Oct 2026, 21:37
35,849
-13
26 Oct 2026, 20:46
35,862
-19
25 Oct 2026, 19:16
35,881
-12
24 Oct 2026, 17:57
35,893
-18
23 Oct 2026, 16:26
35,911
-11
22 Oct 2026, 19:28
35,922
-14
21 Oct 2026, 18:30
35,936
-23
20 Oct 2026, 16:36
35,959
-7
19 Oct 2026, 19:40
35,966
+51
18 Oct 2026, 18:30
35,915
first reading
Engagement
222 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 177 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.73%
avg views ÷ 35,673 subscribers
Avg views / post
973
71 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
73
of 222 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 69 of 71 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
222 (3 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
69,075
Reactions total
1,958
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 05:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,540
Videos
≈870
Links
≈2,040
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
28m 57s
Average length
1m 23s
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,349 reactions across 211 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,109
49.0%
🔥
1,904
30.0%
👌
488
7.69%
💯
224
3.53%
⚡
196
3.09%
👍
150
2.36%
❤🔥
91
1.43%
✍
52
0.819%
😁
33
0.52%
🤣
24
0.378%
😍
14
0.221%
😭
13
0.205%
💔
11
0.173%
🎉
9
0.142%
🥰
8
0.126%
🙏
7
0.11%
👏
5
0.079%
🤔
4
0.063%
🕊
2
0.032%
🆒
1
0.016%
4 further kinds
4
0.063%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 213 of the 222 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,349 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 222 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
0.45%
1 of 222 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,050
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
998
over 218 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqvA9WJ7
1
17 August 2026
17 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 222 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 73 posts held from the last 30 days (5.48%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
«Он как будто специально меня выводит!» 😤
Знакомо? Вы уже пять раз попросили одеться, ребёнок не слушается, спорит, плачет из-за мелочей… И вот вы снова срываетесь на крик.
А потом жалеете и обещаете себе, что больше так не будете.
❤️ Но что, если посмотреть на эти ситуации глазами ребёнка?
Листайте карточки. Возможно, многое увидите по-другому.
А о том, как перестать срываться, поговорим на эфире «Как справлять…
«Не пойду гулять — холодно!»
Сыну 2 года 8 месяцев. С наступлением холодов предложение выйти на прогулку вызывает протест: плачет, уходит в комнату, хлопает дверью.
Мама уже подготовила удобную зону одевания, предлагает выбор одежды. Раньше удавалось спокойно собраться, а теперь ребёнок может даже снимать надетые вещи. На предложения сходить к бабушке или за наклейками отвечает одно: «Там холодно».
Здесь важно зам…
Что скажем о фетровой книжке из разминки?
Это приятный мягкий материал, который малыш может трогать, рассматривать, перелистывать и исследовать руками.
Конкретно эти варианты — эстетичные, с аккуратными деталями. Их можно предложить ребёнку до года, если ему интересно такое взаимодействие.
Важно, чтобы мелкие детали на ленточках, если они есть, были очень надёжно прикреплены к книге. Либо их можно убрать совсем дл…
«Молодец» и «Умница» — достаточно ли этого, чтобы поддерживать ребёнка?
Короткие повторяющиеся оценки — это лишь малая часть той поддержки, которую мы можем давать ребёнку.
До 6 лет можно сформировать у него крепкий фундамент уверенности в себе, от которой будут зависеть успехи в школе и деятельности.
Именно об этом поговорим 12 ноября в 12:00 мск на эфире «Самооценка в порядке: как поддерживать ребёнка в первые 6…
✅ 7 фишек продуманной мамы
Мы собрали такие идеи и подробно расписали в гайде. Внутри — простые изменения, которые можно попробовать дома уже сегодня.
🎁 Дарим гайд за регистрацию на бесплатное обучение «Без крика, слёз и капризов»: https://mchildren.com/secret
— мини-курс «Как уложить ребенка спать» ещё доступен всем участникам в учебном чате
— впереди 3 живых эфира, программа которых есть на сайте
«У тебя что, руки не из того места?»
⬆️Иногда открываешь рот — и слышишь фразу из собственного детства...
💬 Какие ещё фразы из детства выскакивают у вас? Поделитесь в комментариях!
🚀 Школа «Монтессори.Дети» на международной конференции
На выходных прошла XXIII Международная конференция «Монтессори с рождения». Среди её участников было много педагогов, которых вы знаете по «Монтессори.Дети».
Они записывают уроки для наших курсов, проводят встречи и прямые эфиры, отвечают на ваши вопросы о детях.
На конференции выступила и руководитель нашей школы Наталья Журавлёва с темой «Как развивать ребён…
«Ты же старший, уступи». Как незаметно усилить соперничество между детьми?😡
Вы мечтали, что дети будут играть вместе. А теперь один кричит: «Отдай!», второй плачет, и оба требуют, чтобы мама немедленно восстановила справедливость.
Иногда кажется, что они готовы поссориться из-за чего угодно. Но за спором о машинке может стоять гораздо более важный вопрос: «А для меня здесь есть место? Меня тоже замечают?»
Дети деля…
😴💔 «Времени и сил побыть с мужем вечером вдвоём не остаётся — трачу всё на укладывание ребёнка»
Вы договаривались посмотреть фильм. Или хотя бы поужинать вместе и поговорить без постоянного «мам!».
Но сначала нужно уложить ребёнка.
Вы читаете, обнимаете, укачиваете, лежите рядом. Кажется, уже уснул. Осторожно убираете руку — просыпается. Всё сначала.
Когда наконец выходите из комнаты, муж уже засыпает. Ужин остыл.…
🤰Мама спрашивает — ИИ отвечает🤖
До кухни всё-таки хочется добраться раньше совершеннолетия ребёнка 😅
И выпить кофе. И приготовить ужин без непрерывного «ма-а-ам». И вечером немного побыть человеком, у которого тоже есть свои желания.
Поэтому 3–12 ноября приглашаем вас на большое бесплатное обучение «Без крика, слёз и капризов»👇
https://mchildren.com/secret
Запишитесь и сразу получите памятку «7 фишек продуманной …
Говорю «нельзя», а он смотрит на меня и продолжает. Что делать?
Ребёнок рисует на обоях. Вы объясняете, что так нельзя. Он улыбается… и проводит ещё одну линию.
В такие моменты хочется знать: что именно сказать и сделать прямо сейчас? Особенно когда вы устали, торопитесь и чувствуете, что вот-вот повысите голос.
🎁 Мы подготовили подарок — гайд «Топ-5 ситуаций, в которые попадают 99% мам и не знают, что делать: пра…
👍2❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 222 posts we hold for @montessori_children. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 9 posts on @montessori_children as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
19 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 222 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Новокриницкие от 1 до 3 лет @novokrinitskii_otgoda · 33,047 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 September 2026
Дарья Черненко | Меню недели 🍏 | Кулинарная школа @Dasha_Chernenko · 92,006 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
ЛЕГКО В ДЕКРЕТЕ @legko_v_dekrete · 30,910 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Монтессори.Дети” (@montessori_children), 35,673 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/montessori_children.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.