5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,095–1,102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 19:43
1,101
+1
9 Aug 2026, 10:32
1,100
+2
6 Aug 2026, 18:10
1,098
+2
6 Aug 2026, 12:19
1,096
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:32
1,096
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.0%
avg views ÷ 1,101 subscribers
Avg views / post
165
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
19
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
19 (31 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
2,971
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
✍🏻 ناشران و شیوۀ برگزیدن ویراستاران
ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
⚜️ رایجترین و رسمیترین شغل ویراستاران کار برای ناشران است. ویراستاران بهسهم خود، نقش پررنگی در پیشبرد کار ناشران دارند و طبیعی است که ناشران در برگزیدن آنان، دقت و حتی وسواس به خرج دهند.
⚜️ اما همچنان میبینیم ناشران از شیوۀ ناکارآمدی برای گزینش ویراستاران مطلوبشان استفاده میکنند: درخواست ر…
اگر ویراستار باشید و بخواهید برای ناشری کار کنید، ترجیح میدهید آن ناشر برای سنجشِ دانش و مهارتِ ویراستارِ مطلوبش، از شما «رزومه» بخواهد، یا فقط «نمونه» بخواهد؟
رزومه بخواهد ولی نمونه نخواهد4%
نمونه بخواهد ولی رزومه نخواهد19%
هم رزومه بخواهد هم نمونه بخواهد28%
فقط از طریق مکالمه یا مکاتبه با شما مصاحبه کند0%
هم رزومه بخواهد، هم مصاحبه کند6%
هم نمونه بخواهد، هم مصاحبه کند11%
هم رزومه و نمونه بخواهد، هم مصاحبه کند32%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
✍🏻 مراتب دلبستگی در فارسی و انگلیسی
ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
⚜️ در انگلیسی، ۴ وندواره داریم که کارکردِ نسبتاً مشابهی دارند:
-phile
-maniac
-holic
-addict
⚜️ در فارسی، اینها را با واندوارههای زیر ترجمه کردهاند و میکنند:
ــدوست
ــشیفته
ــباره
⚜️ اکنون ضمن توضیح ریشه و معنا و کارکرد هر وندواره، به جستوجوی بهترین برابر فارسی برای ترجمۀ آنها میپرد…
✍🏻 نیمهشب در جستوجوی ستون پنجم
ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
⚜️ پاسی از شب گذشته بود که کستباکس را گشودم و دیدم پادکست «بیپلاس» اپیزود تازهای منتشر کرده با این عنوان:
🔅 وایکینگها، ستون پنجم تمدن غرب
⚜️ با دیدن این عنوان، در دَم جا خوردم؛ چون میدانستم وایکینگها هرچه بودهاند دیگر جاسوس نبودهاند، و با شنیدن مَطلع اپیزود، از اصل ماجرا مُطلع شدم. حدسم در…
✍🏻 آهنگهای معینپسنده (۲)
ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
🔅 آهنگ: سمفونی شمارهٔ ۹ بتهوفن
⚜️ اصل بر این است که نام اشخاص را بر اساس تلفظِ تبار و قومیتِ خود آن شخص بگوییم و بنویسیم. سازندهٔ این سمفونی آلمانی است و ترجیحاً باید نامش را بر اساس قواعدِ تلفظیِ آلمانی ثبت کنیم.
⚜️ نام او، Ludwig van Beethoven، در آلمانی بهصورت [ˈluːtvɪç fan ˈbeːtˌhoːfn] تلفظ میشود و …
✍🏻 از واژهسازی تا زبانپردازی
ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
⚜️ همواره به گوشمان خواندهاند که «فارسی در خطر است»، چندان که گوشمان دیگر از این هشدار پُر است. این سخن البته درست است و آن پروا روا؛ اما تا زمانی که فقط در مغاک هراس فروخَزیم و به آهنگِ آفریدنِ شاهکاری برنخیزیم، گویی البرز به کلند برمیگیریم و آب دریا به کیل میپیماییم؛ چه سرگرم برگردان فلان کتاب و برساخت …
✍🏻 زبانِ باز بهخامۀ ترجمانِ ترزبان
ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
⚜️ در درآمد این کتاب آمده است:
🔅 نام این رساله را «زبانِ باز» گذاشتهام، بهقیاس «جامعۀ باز*»؛ زیرا میان زبانِ باز و جامعۀ باز نسبتی ضروری هست.
*جامعۀ باز: گویا اشارهای است به کتاب شهیر و جریانساز کارل پوپر، جامعۀ باز و دشمنان آن.
🔰 ۱۱ مرداد، زادروز داریوش آشوری است؛
هم نامش نیکو بماند، هم آ…
Signed MOEEN PAYDAR
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @moeennaamak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
اگر ویراستار باشید و بخواهید برای ناشری کار کنید، ترجیح میدهید آن ناشر برای سنجشِ دانش و مهارتِ ویراستارِ مطلوبش، از شما «رزومه» بخواهد، یا فقط «نمونه» بخواهد؟
رزومه بخواهد ولی نمونه نخواهد4%
نمونه بخواهد ولی رزومه نخواهد19%
هم رزومه بخواهد هم نمونه بخواهد28%
فقط از طریق مکالمه یا مکاتبه با شما مصاحبه کند0%
هم رزومه بخواهد، هم مصاحبه کند6%
هم نمونه بخواهد، هم مصاحبه کند11%
هم رزومه و نمونه بخواهد، هم مصاحبه کند32%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 164,325 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“معیننامک | معین پایدار” (@moeennaamak), 1,101 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moeennaamak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.