Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Писательские штучки🖊💻📖📚

Channel

Писательские штучки🖊💻📖📚

@mneawtoru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

125subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002194670817
TypeChannel
Username@mneawtoru
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mneawtoru

Growth

124125124.56 August 2026 — 124 subscribers9 August 2026 — 124 subscribers12 August 2026 — 125 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 124–125 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 12:47125+1
9 Aug 2026, 02:47124no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:51124first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.8%
avg views ÷ 125 subscribers
Avg views / post
19.8
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
42.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held15 (4 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total297
Reactions total126
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

126 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53349527644075663693527.8%
😁1915.1%
custom 53033100309409524391713.5%
1511.9%
❤‍🔥118.73%
👍97.14%
🔥97.14%
32.38%
🤣32.38%
🤔21.59%
💯10.794%
🤓10.794%
🦄10.794%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mneawtoru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC13 views11 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @yasno_livePhoto

🔎 Долгое время в психологии было два измерения «хорошей жизни»: ⏺️ гедоническое благополучие — Насколько человеку приятно жить? Испытывает ли он положительные эмоции? ⏺️ эвдемоническое благополучие — Есть ли в жизни смысл, чувство цели, ощущение, что человек реализует себя? Но исследователи давно заметили, что некоторые люди не вписываются в эти два параметра. Представьте человека, создающего рискованный стартап.

5custom 53349527644075663693🔥2👍1

8 Aug 2026, 07:43 UTC13 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @two_empires

Posted without readable text

custom 53349527644075663693

8 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC19 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💥 ВСПЫШКА №5. Пятничный детектив ☕️ День 5. Пятничный нуар Финал первой недели! Время для классического полуночного триллера. Первая строка сегодня: «Часы пробили полночь, когда кто-то постучал мне в окно. А ведь я живу на седьмом этаже...» Кто пришел в полночь? Какие будут его первые слова, если герой осмелится подойти к окну? Часы пробили полночь, когда кто-то постучал мне в окно. А ведь я живу на седьмом этаже

😁43🔥2🤣2

8 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC15 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @story_hunters_quotes

Когда не знаешь, куда идёшь, дорога сама по себе становится смыслом. Наташа Кокорева | Коснуться дна Найдено охотником Ирина Михалицина #охотники_за_произведениями #Наташа_Кокорева #Коснуться_дна #цитата

custom 53349527644075663693🦄1

7 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC16 views6 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @DK_ashes_of_mystery

О чем на самом деле «Рэстл Скэффолд»? Насилие никогда не начинается с первого удара — оно начинается задолго до него, в сплетении чужих желаний, обид и амбиций. Но что происходит с человеком, который не просто заглянул в эту бездну, а стал её частью? И какие вопросы лежат в самом сердце РС? Обитель зла: внутри или снаружи? «А не мы ли несём в себе зло?» Зло не приходит из темноты, чтобы поглотить чистых душой. Оно

❤‍🔥2🤔2👍1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC21 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💥 ВСПЫШКА №4. Драма и воспоминания ✉️ День 4. Письмо в бутылке На старой флешке со смешным названием Фирюзкин, забытой сто лет назад в кабинете каким-то студентом, и которую я считал пустой, обнаружился всего один текстовый файл под названием "Прочти, если я исчезну". Интересненько. Вдруг там что-то важное? 🤔 Я кликнул на файл. "Если ты читаешь это, то наверняка уже гадаешь, куда я делась. Прости. Я так и не решилас

😁4custom 53033100309409524394🤣1

7 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC21 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @story_hunters_quotes

Спасая человека, ты не знаешь, во благо действуешь или во зло Наташа Кокорева | Коснуться дна Найдено охотником Алина Алихрамова #охотники_за_произведениями #Наташа_Кокорева #Коснуться_дна #цитата

custom 533495276440756636943🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC18 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @DK_ashes_of_mystery

Стоит ли кому-то показывать свои первые тексты? ​Каждый автор проходит через это искушение: только что поставлена точка в первой главе (или даже в целом черновике) и на душе эйфория. Текст кажется гениальным. И хочется тут же сунуть его под нос самому близкому человеку со словами: «Посмотри, оцени, это вообще читаемо?» ​Спойлер: почти всегда это худшая идея. Почему не стоит нести сырой черновик маме, мужу или дру

custom 533495276440756636953❤‍🔥2💯1

6 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC21 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💥 ВСПЫШКА №3. Юмор и абсурд 🦎 День 3. Экватор недели: Перевернем реальность! Сегодня включаем режим иронии и бытового абсурда. Пусть ваш герой столкнется с чем-то максимально странным в самый обычный день. Первая строка сегодня: «Утро началось неплохо, пока мой кот часом позже не заговорил со мной на чистом французском...» О чем он попросил? О круассане вместо сухого корма или предупредил о заговоре? Утро началос

😁4custom 530331003094095243921

6 Aug 2026, 06:25 UTC18 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @story_hunters_quotes

— Даже не отдохнёте с дороги? — сладко улыбнулся Ерих. И эта улыбка говорила Агиле больше любых слов: отец зол! Наташа Кокорева | Коснуться дна Найдено охотником Алина Алихрамова #охотники_за_произведениями #Наташа_Кокорева #Коснуться_дна #цитата

custom 53349527644075663693

5 Aug 2026, 06:24 UTC21 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @SocietyOfLnkSoulsPhoto

Где брать энергию: физиология творчества Почему в один день мы пишем без остановки, а в другой — страдаем от чистого листа? Проблема в том, что творчество — это не волевое усилие, а физиологический процесс. И работает он по своим принципам. Прогулка работает не сразу Учёные из Стэнфорда давно показали, что ходьба разгоняет креативность — это уже почти классика. Интересный факт: от 10 до 25 минут умеренной физическо

custom 53349527644075663699👍4❤‍🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC22 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @story_hunters_quotes

Дождь не выбирает, куда ему падать. Его направляет ветер. А я? Я позволю ветру чужой воли направлять меня, или сама смогу стать своим ветром? Наталья Нохрина | Руны Стормграва Найдено охотником Делена Фрост #охотники_за_произведениями #Наталья_Нохрина #Руны_Стормграва #цитата

custom 53033100309409524394

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @mneawtoru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 145,684 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Писательские штучки🖊💻📖📚” (@mneawtoru), 125 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mneawtoru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.