4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +67. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,257–1,344 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 12:17
1,334
+2
10 Aug 2026, 14:51
1,332
+51
7 Aug 2026, 08:13
1,281
+14
7 Aug 2026, 01:46
1,267
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.6%
avg views ÷ 1,334 subscribers
Avg views / post
488
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (31 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
9,267
Reactions total
555
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
555 reactions across 19 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5399954070775542226
555
100.0%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 555reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🩶 как пережить расставание или разлуку и не сломаться
проблема в том, что мы боимся пустоты. но это время — твой шанс на невероятный личный рост
🔤рансформация —
🔤время для себя: направь всю нерастраченную энергию в свои проекты, блог и спорт. стань лучшей версией себя к его возвращению
🔤чувства — это нормально: не подавляй грусть. дай ей время, но не позволяй ей занять всю твою жизнь
🔤новые цели: поставь амбициозную…
ֹ ׅ топ-3 компонента для ухода за кожей летом
⊹ ниацинамид. сужает поры, регулирует жирный блеск и мягко осветляет следы от прыщиков
⊹ центенлла азиатская. быстро успокаивает кожу после солнца, снимает красноту и восстанавливает защитный барьер
⊹ гиалуроновая кислота. глубоко увлажняет и запечатывает влагу внутри, даря то самое свежее сияние
🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶
🩶 визуализация: как планировать, чтобы сбывалось
проблема карт желаний в том, что на них только картинки, но нет действий. в 2026 году мы планируем по-взрослому
🔤вой план —
🔤детализация: не просто «хочу машину», а «я зарабатываю столько-то на такой-то проект»
🔤визуализация процесса: представляй не только результат, но и то, как ты с удовольствием работаешь над ним
🔤первый шаг: любое желание должно закончиться действи…
🩶 синдром «отложенной жизни»: почему нельзя ждать идеального момента
«вот сдам сессию и начну ухаживать за собой», «вот наступит лето и я займусь спортом», «вот купим эту вещь и тогда я буду счастлива». мы постоянно пишем черновик жизни, искренне веря, что где-то в будущем наступит тот самый идеальный момент, когда всё сложится само собой. но правда в том, что идеального момента не существует. это главная иллюзия н…
🩶 тинт + масло: секрет самых сочных губ
помада часто выглядит слишком «тяжело» для дневного образа. тинт дает цвет, а масло — объем
🔤ффект зацелованных губ —
🔤тинт в центр: нанеси каплю цвета только в центр губ и растушуй пальцем к краям
🔤масло сверху: прозрачное масло создаст зеркальный блеск и напитает кожу
🔤карандаш в тон: слегка пройдись карандашом по контуру, выходя на 1 мм за край, чтобы добавить объема
🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶
хорошо, но можно лучше. я напишу в комментариях совет13%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
〣 ₊ что должно быть в сумочке для идеального глоу-апа 𓂃
在 сухой парфюм в стике — чтобы обновить любимый шлейф за пару секунд
在 масло-карандаш для кутикулы — мгновенно возвращает ногтям ухоженный вид
在 матирующие салфетки — убирают лишний блеск, не забивая поры и не портя макияж
在 компактное зеркальце — чтобы всегда быть уверенной в своем образе
🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶
🩶 минимализм в косметичке: как не покупать лишнее
проблема в том, что мы ведемся на маркетинг и скупаем 10 сывороток. на самом деле коже нужно не так много
🔤азовый минимум —
🔤🔤очищение, увлажнение, защита: три столпа, на которых держится всё
🔤🔤один актив: выбери одну проблему (например, высыпания или тусклость) и бери одну рабочую сыворотку под неё
🔤🔤качество выше количества: лучше один люксовый тон, который ложится …
🩶 психологический иммунитет: как перестать впитывать чужой негатив и тревогу
бывало ли у тебя такое: ты просыпаешься в прекрасном настроении, но стоит зайти в соцсети, пообщаться с вечно недовольной знакомой или выслушать чужие жалобы — и всё, твой ресурс на нуле?
в психологии это называется эмоциональным заражением. наша психика устроена так, что мы подсознательно копируем состояние людей вокруг. если у тебя нет чет…
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
custom 539995407077554222614
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @misuanx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
хорошо, но можно лучше. я напишу в комментариях совет13%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 233,737 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“• ₊° домик мисуан .⟡” (@misuanx), 1,334 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/misuanx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
