Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Mind Your Gap Вани Бута

@mindyourgap

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

969subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001256293087
TypeChannel
Username@mindyourgap
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mindyourgap

Growth

969970969.56 Aug 2026, 02:35 — 970 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 13:34 — 970 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 17:11 — 969 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 02:356 Aug 2026, 17:11
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 969–970 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 17:11969-1
6 Aug 2026, 13:34970no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:35970first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.4%
avg views ÷ 969 subscribers
Avg views / post
479
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (30 April 202531 July 2026)
Views total479
Reactions total27
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

693 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
42260.9%
🔥8011.5%
🎉649.24%
👍466.64%
❤‍🔥304.33%
💔131.88%
😁111.59%
71.01%
😢60.866%
🤝40.577%
🙏30.433%
👏20.289%
10.144%
🏆10.144%
🙊10.144%
🤨10.144%
🥰10.144%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 693reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mindyourgap. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 April 2025 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 14:20 UTC479 views27 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

🎸 Письмо #35. Июль 2026 Судя по лайкам к предыдущему выпуску, история про Боярского не зашла. Что ж, такое меня не остановит, поэтому я принёс истории про Т.А.Т.У. и Валерию. Помимо этих жемчужин, рассказываю про лучший фильм о любви и как сражаюсь с Амазоном, делюсь итогами чемпионата мира и (не)много вспоминаю Мэтта Деймона. Текст здесь: https://ivanbut.substack.com/p/2026-07

16👍4🔥4😁2🙊1

30 Jun 2026, 09:58 UTC893 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026

👨🏻 Письмо #34. Июнь 2026 Сегодня у меня история знакомства с Михаилом Сергеевичем Боярским. Вообще, для любого петербуржца Боярский — это уже давно не актёр, а символ. Нева, Зенит, Боярский. Размышляю насколько наша встреча повлияла на мою жизнь. В остальном у меня в письме много вопросов. Почти все заголовки начинаются с как. Надеюсь, у тебя будут ответы — комментарии можно оставлять прямо в сабстеке. Текст здесь

19👍41

31 May 2026, 16:41 UTC≈1,140 views41 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

🪨 Письмо #33. Май 2026 Даже не знаю, о чём писать превью — тот самый выпуск, в котором нет громких заголовков. Например, я там пишу про камни. Кто будет читать про камни. В конце даже есть фото камней. Но если почитать целиком, то может это обретёт какой-то смысл. Камни — это топ. Текст здесь: https://ivanbut.substack.com/p/2026-05

34👍7

30 Apr 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,320 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🪗 Письмо #32. Апрель 2026 У меня никогда нет контент-плана на выпуск: в течение месяца я кидаю случайные заметки, а после собираю из них текст. Дальше я перечитываю — и часто замечаю мета-смыслы уже после редактуры. Например, этот выпуск получился с перекосом в ностальгию, и теперь сижу думаю отчего и куда. В выпуске сегодня будет переосмыление передачи «Играй, гармонь любимая», и, думаю, на этом можно заканчивать

18😁9👍3

31 Mar 2026, 10:03 UTC≈1,350 views25 reactions11 Starsread 6 August 2026

🪓 Письмо #31. Март 2026 Заметил, что я — человек вдохновения, особенно в текстах. Сам себя за это не люблю, но иногда, чтобы начать писать, мне прямо надо попасть в поток. Читал о похожем у других авторов (я не одинок). Некоторые запускают состояние потока искусственно — подмечая то, что его инициирует. Заваривают чай, идут в любимое кафе, пишут от руки. Другие (вроде С. Кинга) считают, что в творчестве побеждает ди

21👍3🔥1

28 Feb 2026, 17:35 UTC≈1,170 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🤖 Письмо #30. Февраль 2026 Я работаю в ИИ-стартапе — поэтому тема выпуска про него. В первую очередь стараюсь систематизировать мысли для себя. Важно: выпуск по-прежнему написан мной, агент мне помогает, но об этом внутри. Кроме этого: покемонам 30 лет, игральная карточка за $16'000'000, Магнус снова чемпион мира, Моргенштерн норм, а я хочу звезду Мишлен. Текст здесь: https://ivanbut.substack.com/p/2026-02

15🔥5👍3

31 Jan 2026, 08:03 UTC≈1,460 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🍸 Письмо #29. Январь 2026 Ночной царь Лондона, Шерлок Холмс от Миядзаки, как проходит моя интеграция в британское общество, Dry January, дневник, который я полюбил на 366 день и вопрос, на который предлагаю ответить вместе. Текст здесь: https://ivanbut.substack.com/p/2026-01

24👍8

31 Dec 2025, 12:04 UTC≈1,600 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🎄 Гудбай, 2025 Подумал, что слово «итоги» опошлилось и потеряло смысл. Часто хочется написать, что прочитал X книжек и отжался Y раз. Но ведь задумка про то, чтобы «провести ретро»: посмотреть, что понравилось, что нет. Подумать, что взять с собой хорошего. Зафиксировать и порадоваться важному. Ниже будут и типичные номинации вроде «места года», и просто размышления о том, что пошло так или не так. Мне было полезно

28👍5

16 Dec 2025, 08:57 UTC≈1,560 views37 reactions4 Starsread 6 August 2026

🗒 Важные тексты 2025 Начинаю подводить итоги года и хочу часть про чужие тексты выгрузить уже, а то много получается. https://ivanbut.substack.com/p/texts2025 Я начинал 2025-й с ощущением, что море по плавки, и я могу/хочу пробовать всё. Заканчиваю 2025-й в принятии своих ограничений. Я не хочу пробовать всё. В течение года были тексты, которые на меня заметно повлияли. Ниже — подборка. В сабстеке у меня подробные

28😢6🙏3

1 Dec 2025, 08:02 UTC≈1,210 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⚾️ Письмо #28. Ноябрь 2025 Homo survivicus, радость и ненависть большого города, угадай страну по фото, зачем писать на бейсбольных мячах, истории успеха (не мои) и ИИ-песни (мои). Текст здесь: https://ivanbut.substack.com/p/2025-11

❤‍🔥146🔥2

31 Oct 2025, 08:00 UTC≈1,660 views54 reactionsread 6 August 2026

☎️ Письмо #27. Октябрь 2025 Месяц выдался неоднозначным, но под конец появился повод для мини-праздника: я получил местный ПМЖ! Это приятный майлстоун. В череде бытовых дел я даже пытаюсь специально напоминать себе, что это хороший повод порадоваться. Сегодня в выпуске: признание своих лимитов, правило ПДО, звонок другу без предупреждения и где искать в Лондоне украденный телефон. Текст здесь: https://ivanbut.subs

39🔥12👏21

2 Oct 2025, 21:39 UTC≈1,810 views46 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🫧 Письмо #26. Сентябрь 2025 3 года в эмиграции, непоступление на журфак, секрет дружбы, Эмирейтс, рассуждения о карьерных перспективах и тонометр. Последний — причина опоздания. Во всём виноваты тонометры. Текст здесь: https://ivanbut.substack.com/p/2025-09

35👍7💔3🤨1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mindyourgap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 257,966 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mind Your Gap Вани Бута” (@mindyourgap), 969 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mindyourgap.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.