Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Глеб Михайлов

Channel

Глеб Михайлов

@mikhaylovgleb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,052subscribers

-59 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001451120475
TypeChannel
Username@mikhaylovgleb
DescriptionУчу DA, DS, DE, MLE, SE проходить алгоритмические собесы Отзывы: @mikhaylovgleb_otzuvu Личка: @glebmikh https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/686c6c89ccc45029e5515b11
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mikhaylovgleb

Growth

14,05214,11114,081.57 August 2026 — 14,111 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,106 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,107 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,106 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,095 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,085 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,078 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,062 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,057 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,052 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -59. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,043–14,120 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:0514,052-5
16 Aug 2026, 03:1714,057-5
14 Aug 2026, 16:3614,062-16
13 Aug 2026, 05:2514,078-7
12 Aug 2026, 05:4714,085-10
11 Aug 2026, 06:2514,095-11
10 Aug 2026, 06:4214,106-1
9 Aug 2026, 03:1114,107+1
8 Aug 2026, 01:5114,106-5
7 Aug 2026, 02:4614,111first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.4%
avg views ÷ 14,052 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,140
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held19 (14 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total53,440
Reactions total714
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
217
Videos
36
Links
348

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
26m 33s
Average length
3m 19s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

797 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁27234.1%
custom 540915239607495273323329.2%
12615.8%
🔥9011.3%
👍506.27%
custom 5429363803500338694182.26%
custom 539095000255195489770.878%
🎉10.125%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 797reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC≈1,240 views18 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Рынок IT больше не Дикий Запад. Это зрелый рынок, где на одной актёрской игре уже не выехать. В четвёртом выпуске алгоритмических новостей разбираем причину трендов: почему задачи усложняются, а алгособесы теперь везде. Что изменилось: • Конкуренция дикая: все хотят в IT за высокими зарплатами. • Накрутка резюме и опыта делается за пару вечеров. • ИИ-суфлёры: кандидатов уже просят закрывать глаза, чтобы ловить

custom 540915239607495273316🔥2

17 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC≈1,530 views28 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

ДиКаприо или Том Круз — с кого брать пример при поиске работы? Узнаешь сегодня в 15:00 МСК в 4ом выпуске Алгоритмически новостей

😁17custom 542936380350033869411

14 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC≈2,150 views39 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Проклятый старый литкод Сегодня алго новостей не будет, уже в понедельник вернусь с разбором причин того что происходит с алго интервью. А пока можешь заценить новый разбор задачки на литкод). Там нужно помочь деду выбраться из лабиринта. https://youtu.be/YLJB7fwH0zA?si=VU8qZ6u4RRtgBSri Задача достаточно сложная, так что осторожно)

18🔥12custom 54091523960749527339

13 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC≈2,540 views30 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Две мясных котлеты гриль, специальный соус, сыр, огурцы... Но алгоритмырешать всё равно придётся! В третьем выпуске алгоритмических новостей разбираем новый поворот: алгоритмы вышли за пределы бигтеха. Теперь их спрашивают не только у разработчиков, но и у аналитиков и дата-саентистов. Где сейчас дают алгоритмы: • Телекомы • Банки: Сбер полюбил связанные списки) • Ритейл: X5 стабильно мучает кандидатов алго зад

custom 5409152396074952733207😁3

12 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC≈2,440 views10 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Вот кстати, в дополнение к сегодняшним алго новостям. СДВГ-разбор в котором рассказал про доп вопрос от X5 к одной из самых частых задач на собесах в российский биг-тех. https://youtube.com/shorts/6FLohrM3uRM?si=wZb1qv__rPyL9JUC

custom 54091523960749527338🔥2

12 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC≈2,370 views22 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Самый длинный (не я это придумал) Снова и снова Яндекс задает этот извечный вопрос. Кастомных задач (нет на LeetCode) становится всё больше и больше. А также больше преимиум задач и больше хитрых дополнительных вопросов к известным задачам. Во втором выпуске Алгоритмических новостей: • «самый длинный подотрезок с минимумом X». Звучит хитро, провоцируя на скользящее окно. На деле — замаскированная Max Consecutive

custom 540915239607495273316custom 542936380350033869432😁1

11 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC≈2,530 views35 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Изоморфные струны — вот до чего докатились. Именно их получит добряк продуктовый аналитик на собеседовании в Wildberries. Это струны даже моей души задело) В первом выпуске алгоритмических новостей разбираем новые вводные: Задачи на алгособесах усложнились. "Я человек простой, вижу массив — пилю цикл" больше не канает. Надо реально шарить в алго паттернах. Что сейчас спрашивают: • X5: дата-саентистам дают Jump

custom 5409152396074952733286custom 54293638035003386941

10 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC≈2,720 views32 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Зацени СДВГ-разбор задачи которую постоянно дают аналитикам и дс https://youtube.com/shorts/sHxFx5LGzz4?si=O3goLrUhcXNPviuI А завтра в 15 мск жди начало марафона контента, будет выпуск Алгоритмических новостей (с Глебом Михайловы) 🐆

custom 5409152396074952733214👍4custom 54293638035003386942🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC≈3,860 views39 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Побаловал себя новым леопардовым подарком На этой неделе вышли обновления подарков в тг, и в том числе леопардовая ручка Cheetah King. Ну я не смог пройти мимо. И уже надел на канал). Спасибо вам за ваши бусты, именно они позволяют надевать подарки на канал ❤️ Скидывайте в коменты фотки что леопардового себе прикупили) П.С. На след неделе уже потихонечку буду начинать марафон/спринт контента перед стартом сентяб

custom 54091523960749527332312🔥4

6 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC≈3,560 views35 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Разбирал тут новую задачку от Яндекса (сегодня видос выйдет на Ютюб) Вот такая задача: Дан массив целых чисел и число X, требуется найти самый длинный (у кого тут самый длинный?) непустой подотрезок, минимум на котором равен X. Верните длину такого подотрезка или -1, если таких подотрезков нет. Естественно пользовался ИИ, чтобы ничего не упустить. Начинаю смотреть решение от ИИ и понимаю, что слишком мудрено он р

👍16custom 5409152396074952733105😁4

4 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC≈3,210 views63 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

10 признаков психологических травм у офисного кореша: как распознать родственную душу? - играет (лушче даже если учится играть) на музыкальном инструменте — значит недолюбили в детстве. Это сразу бинго. Можно дальше не искать -- из этого получится лучший кореш. - много шутит — тоже всегда следствие травм, комедия = трагедия + время - принципиально не переносит начальников и авторитеты — скорее всего проблемы с род

😁529🎉1👍1

30 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTC≈3,670 views24 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

12 Секретов Литкод На ютюбчике завоз, рассказал мало известные секреты Литкод, среди которых: • можно ли верить бенчмаркам • зачем нужна песочница (playground) • и что такое китайский скор https://youtu.be/G2K2_S_Ogpw

🔥16custom 540915239607495273352😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @mikhaylovgleb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 214,966 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Data Secrets
@data_secrets · 92,194
Telegram ranks this channel #96 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Глеб Михайлов” (@mikhaylovgleb), 14,052 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mikhaylovgleb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.