Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

HDSHY

@hdshycom

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,037subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002434929038
TypeChannel
Username@hdshycom
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hdshycom

Growth

1,0371,0391,0388 August 2026 — 1,039 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,039 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,037 subscribers8 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,037–1,039 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:371,037-2
9 Aug 2026, 02:211,039no change
8 Aug 2026, 21:301,039first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 14 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.6%
avg views ÷ 1,037 subscribers
Avg views / post
442
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held13 (14 December 20258 August 2026)
Views total1,326
Reactions total19
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

86 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4552.3%
🤩2225.6%
👍1214.0%
🌚78.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 14 December 2025 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC136 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

اگر هوش مصنوعی تولید محتوا را ارزان، سریع و بی‌نهایت کند، «ساخته‌شده توسط انسان» تبدیل به یک ارزش می‌شود؟ آیا در آینده برای چیزی که یک انسان ساخته، حاضر می‌شویم بیشتر پول بدهیم؟ مشاهده پست

👍1

17 Jul 2026, 17:51 UTC581 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

یک سؤال خوب همیشه کافی نیست. گاهی لازم نیست سؤالت رو عوض کنی فقط باید به ChatGPT بگی چطور جواب بده. پرامپت Absolute Mode دقیقاً برای همین ساخته شده؛ جواب‌های مستقیم‌تر، کوتاه‌تر و بدون حاشیه اینو اول گفتگو بهش بده System Instruction: Absolute Mode Respond with direct, precise, and information-dense language. Eliminate emojis, filler, hype, hedging, conversational transitions, emotional softening, engagement optim

👍6🤩4🔥1

15 Jul 2026, 13:15 UTC609 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

بیشتر توسعه‌دهنده‌ها توی VibeCoding فقط روی پرامپت تمرکز می‌کنن، در حالی که چیزی که واقعاً کیفیت خروجی رو بهتر می‌کنه، Context هست. برای همین Blueprint# رو ساختم. مشاهده ابزار پالت رنگ، فونت، فاصله‌ها، Radius و Shadow رو انتخاب می‌کنی، همون لحظه نتیجه رو به‌صورت زنده می‌بینی و در نهایت یک design.md# آماده برای Claude Code، Cursor و سایر AI Coding Assistantها دانلود می‌کنی @hdshycom

🔥5👍1🤩1

13 Jul 2026, 13:37 UTC520 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

بیشتر آدم‌ها دنبال نوشتن پرامپت بهترن. در حالی که مشکل، پرامپت نیست. اگر هر روز یک دستور را تکرار می‌کنی، آن را از پرامپت خارج کن و به بخشی از سیستم تبدیلش کن. brand rules پرامپت‌ها برای درخواست‌اند. سیستم‌ها برای تکرار. مشاهده آموزش @hdshycom

🔥5🌚1🤩1

11 Jul 2026, 09:48 UTC566 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ساخت تصویر استودیویی با نورپردازی کنتراست بالا از کاراکترهای سه‌بعدی که در هوا معلق‌اند و بر اثر نیروی مغناطیسی به هم جذب شده و به‌صورت فشرده در کنار یکدیگر قرار گرفته‌اند. High-contrast studio photo of my character mid-air, magnetically pulled to center. Dense overlapping cluster. Random rotations. Mid-air collisions. Compression at contact points. Neutral gray background. Shallow depth of field. 100mm perspective.

🤩5🌚2🔥1

9 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC596 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

فکر می‌کردم مشکل از محدودیت پلن #ClaudeCode باشه. بعد فهمیدم نصف داستان به نحوه استفاده از خود کلاد کد برمی‌گرده. این ۱۰ نکته چیزهاییه که خودم استفاده می‌کنم تا Usage کمتر مصرف کنم. مشاهده آموزش @hdshycom

🔥3🤩2🌚1

28 Jun 2026, 19:19 UTC778 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Convert this portrait photo into a minimalist pop art illustration Use bold black-and-white contrast with halftone shading on the face Keep the background a solid pastel color (like teal) The character should wear dark sunglasses, outlined in black, with clean geometric lines Add a small cartoon-style. The overall style should be flat, graphic, and modern, similar to retro comic book art. ChatGPT T : @hdshycom iG :

🔥2🤩2🌚1

21 Jun 2026, 19:06 UTC815 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Create a stylized 3D art-toy character floating mid-air, using the reference character exactly as provided. Preserve the original face, hairstyle, clothing, colors, proportions, accessories, materials, and identity without any modifications. Pose: dynamic weightless pose, slight body twist, one knee bent, relaxed expressive arms. Orbiting around the character: retro keyboard, floppy disks, loose keycaps, cables, an

🤩4

21 Jun 2026, 10:38 UTC651 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

StillTime 🕘 Screensaver for macOS & Win. Ready to Download. Download Now

🔥3🤩1

17 Jun 2026, 22:24 UTC864 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Please transform the entire image into a single Decorative Folk Flat Illustration with Doodle elements. Use a bold and playful color palette, completely different from the original image. Simplify all details into clean, flat shapes with a handmade, slightly imperfect feel, as if drawn on a sheet of white paper. The overall style should look cute, childlike, and whimsical ChatGPT T : @hdshycom iG : hdshy Website :

🔥6👍1

27 May 2026, 08:17 UTC≈1,250 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Turn the person from the photo into a grotesque humorous fashion caricature sketch. Strongly exaggerated anatomy, elongated proportions, expressive crooked hands, dramatic face, awkward elegant posture, satirical fashion energy, messy ink lines, rough watercolor, sketchbook style, vintage magazine illustration on beige aged paper. Add handwritten farsi notes, arrows, funny observations, doodles, and absurd personali

🔥5🌚1

26 May 2026, 14:32 UTC≈1,130 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Redraw the attached image in the most clumsy, scribbly, and utterly pathetic way possible. Use a white background, and make it look like it was drawn in an old computer painting program with a mouse. It should be vaguely similar but also not really, kind of matching but also off in a confusing, awkward way, with that low-quality pixel-by-pixel feel that really emphasizes how ridiculously bad it is. Actually, you know

🔥6🌚1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @hdshycom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 978,629 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“HDSHY” (@hdshycom), 1,037 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hdshycom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.