Channel
@metod_sovremennyi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Declared links · Cite this entry
127subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002496906238 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @metod_sovremennyi |
| Description | Онлайн-Конференция "Современные методы психотерапии" на тему "Отношения и семейная терапия" 17-18 Мая https://satorispace.ru/onlajn-konferenciya-otnosheniya-i-semejnaya-terapiya/ |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/metod_sovremennyi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 127 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 127 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 17 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
118 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 69 | 58.5% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 22.9% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 11.0% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 6.78% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.847% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2025 to 21 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Огромное спасибо всем участникам, спикерам за глубокие дискуссии и практические инсайты! Если вы что-то пропустили — у вас еще есть шанс погрузиться в материалы! Записи будут доступны для участников) До встречи на новых конференциях🤍
❤6🔥3🥰2👍1
Как вам лекции и темы конференции?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤5🔥3👍1🥰1
Итак, итоги розыгрыша✨ Каждый участник напишите своему эксперту в личные сообщения) Анастасия Башкатова Экспресс сессия «Глубинная распаковка» – Amina Mather Валерия Каплан Сессия – @MarinaVerbitckaia Ангелина Чегодаева Скидка 5000р. на участие в онлайн группе «РОД. Поколение перемен» – @Katerinaduscha Поздравляем участников и желаем классных инстайтов и проработок🤩
❤5🔥3🥰1
Запись эфира «Ролевые перекосы в семейной и родовой системе» Ангелина Чегодаева В эфире выявили🤩 🤩Причины семейных дисбалансов, которые многие чувствуют, но не всегда могут объяснить. 🤩Узнали, как невидимые ролевые перекосы влияют на отношения, почему мы бессознательно повторяем сценарии предков и как это мешает нам строить гармоничные связи здесь и сейчас. Если вы хоть раз задавались подобными вопросами: «Почему …
❤6🔥3👍1🥰1
Live stream finished (41 minutes)
Live stream started
Давайте узнаем, какие перекосы влияют на наши взаимоотношения с партнером? Уже через 20 минут – эфир Ангелины Чегодаевой🌟 Вопросы можете задавать здесь🤩
❤5🔥3🥰1
Эфир Лалы Джагитян в 14:00 отменяется по семейным обстоятельствам. В комментариях Вы найдете презентацию – гайд по работе со стыдом в психодраме. Пожалуйста, задавайте свои вопросы, Лала на них ответит🌟
❤8🔥1🥰1
«Ролевые перекосы в семейной и родовой системе» Ангелина Чегодаева Доверие и контакт в паре, понимание и дружба с детьми, поддержка родителей – все это результат здоровой расстановки в семейной системе. К сожалению, не все всегда зависит только от нас, многие перекосы тянутся от наших предков и имеют вполне понятные, на самом деле, причины. Поговорим с вами о важности иерархии, о том как мы играем не свои роли и п…
❤8🔥2🥰1
Вина как регулятор агрессии в отношениях. – Как обнаружить, понять и работать с ней в психодраме? Лала Джагитян Психодрама дает возможность отреагировать свои эмоции, развивает спонтанность и свободу в проявлении и предъявлении себя миру, расширяет опыт и помогает увидеть новые пути. В ней можно проигрывать прошлое, завершать незавершенное, разрешать конфликты, проживать будущее прямо «здесь и сейчас». Многообрази…
❤8🔥2🥰1
Запись эфира "Исцеление отношений с образами близких с помощью EFT". Валерия Каплан На эфире разобрали такие вопросы🤩 🤩Знакома ли вам ситуация, что именно с вами человек ведёт себя определенным, не самым приятным, образом (тогда как с другими людьми ведет себя совсем иначе?) 🤩Или же, наоборот, у вас с конкретным человеком меняется состояние, самоощущение и даже образ себя (часто не в лучшую сторону)? 🤩Как же так п…
❤5👍4🔥1🥰1🙏1
Live stream finished (1 hour)
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @metod_sovremennyi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как вам лекции и темы конференции?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2025 to 21 May 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 350,549 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@metod_sovremennyi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Современные Методы Психотерапии” (@metod_sovremennyi), 127 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/metod_sovremennyi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.