Channel
@nastie_live
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
415subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001596957032 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nastie_live |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nastie_live |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 415 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 416 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 416 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (15 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 394 |
| Reactions total | 66 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
72 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 24 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 22 | 30.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 21 | 29.2% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 4.17% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 2.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💚 Друзья, сегодня вместо послания от карт «Сердце Системы» предлагаю сделать кое-что ещё интереснее ✨ Изучить архитектуру своей внутренней системы. Некоторое время назад я создала бот, который по дате рождения рассчитывает врождённые энергии человека через его матрицу и системный подход. Раньше он был доступен только участникам практикума «Сердце Системы». Но сегодня мне захотелось поделиться им со всеми 👐 После …
❤4🔥3
Вчера записывали подкаст с коллегой, которая пригласила меня на откровенный разговор. Я очень честно рассказала о том, как складывался мой путь. Про выбор себя, про решения, которые в моменте казались нелогичными. Про внутренний зов, который сначала очень тихий, но если однажды его услышал — уже невозможно сделать вид, что его нет. И как же синхронично это совпало с темой месяца, которая сегодня началась у нас в Кл…
❤4❤🔥2🔥2
Моя короткая поездка домой в Москву в этот раз была как вспышка) Но я так люблю…так еще больше ценишь и ждешь следующей встречи ✨✨✨ Вернулись домой в Сочи и здесь уже все дни расписаны под завязку – но всё это уже с новыми эмоциями, впечатлениями, осознаниями, новыми силами, под закаты, рассветы и соленые брызги 🚀 Как важно периодически выбираться куда-то, даже если по началу совсем не хочется) Весь сок жизни – в …
❤🔥6❤4🔥3
«ВЫЙТИ ИЗ ТЕНИ» 2 поток 💜 МЫ НЕ МОЖЕМ НЕ ПРОДОЛЖАТЬ Вот правда. Мы закончили первый поток «ВЫЙТИ ИЗ ТЕНИ», смотрим на всё, что там произошло, читаем сообщения участников — и понимаем, что на этом просто нельзя остановиться. Потому что мы, конечно, создавали программу. Мы знали, что будем делать. 💎Мы выстраивали внутреннюю иерархию. 💎Разбирались, кто внутри управляет жизнью и бизнесом. 💎Снимали ограничения. Дела…
❤🔥4❤2🔥2
Мы должны были встретиться в центре на Тульской, как и обычно… После моих неудачных попыток найти место для однодневного ретрита в ближайшем Подмосковье, я бросила эту затею (везде от двух дней и с проживанием)… Но правильно запущенное намерение работает само, хочешь ты этого или нет 😁 За три дня до мероприятия этот день организовал себя сам 🥰 И получился самый настоящий однодневный ретрит 🌴 Было очень душевно: у…
❤🔥5🔥3❤2
Я год не была в Москве! И не знаю, соскучилась я или нет по дому, но точно знаю — встречаться в живом поле люблю 🤗 Конечно же, я не могу не использовать этот момент для нашей встречи в расстановочных процессах ✨✨✨ Поэтому уже в это воскресение, 26 июля, мы встречаемся на расстановках 🔥 Что будет на этот раз? Всегда всё происходит по-новому. Потому что контекст определяет не только актуальная тема, но и сама групп…
🔥4❤3🥰3
Как приятно, что игра Сердце Системы прорастает «в» и «через» моих талантливых учеников 🥰 Каждый раз радуюсь, когда вижу как они применяют её в практике самыми разными способами 💚 Пусть как можно больше людей получат всё самое лучшее благодаря этой игре 🙏 В клубе МИР играем в нее каждый месяц, кто хочет познакомиться с ней ближе онлайн – приходите)
❤🔥4❤3🔥3
Друзья, кто хотел попасть на наш эфир о проявленности с певицей Натальей Сидорцовой, но так и не попал? Мы наконец-то выложили запись. И это такая кладезь вдохновения 🔥🔥🔥 Мы говорили о том, что сегодня происходит с каждым, кто хочет проявляться. О страхе, о внутренних конфликтах, о том, как быть увиденным — и не сгореть. ❌Сегодня недостаточно просто быть хорошим специалистом. Можно бесконечно учиться, получать ди…
🔥4👍2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @nastie_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 184,253 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МИР Сердце Системы Анастасии Башкатовой” (@nastie_live), 415 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nastie_live.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.