Channel
@medlights
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,383subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001630420053 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @medlights |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/medlights |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 2,383 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 2,384 | +20 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 2,364 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 2,365 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 2,365 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (2 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 21,006 |
| Reactions total | 813 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
813 reactions across 27 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 689 | 84.7% | |
| 😁 | 54 | 6.64% | |
| 👍 | 32 | 3.94% | |
| 🤣 | 22 | 2.71% | |
| 😍 | 8 | 0.984% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 0.492% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.369% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.123% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 813reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✨ خدایا! به سبب دانشت که محیط بر همه چیز است، از تو درخواست خیر دارم؛ پس بر محمّد و آلش درود فرست و به خیر و نیکی در حقّ من حکم فرما. و شناخت انتخاب کردن و برگزیدن را به ما الهام کن و آن الهام را برای ما وسیلۀ خشنودی به آنچه که برای ما مقرر کردی و تسلیم به آنچه در حقّ ما حکم فرمودی، قرار ده؛ پس آلودگی شک و دودلی در تقدیرت را از دل ما پاک کن و ما را به یقین مخلصان تقویت فرما. ✨ و داغ ناتوانی معرفت را نسبت به آنچه برای…
❤68👎1
خب وقتی تصمیم گرفتم که نهایتا مسیر رزیدنتی رو انتخاب کنم، حالا باید تصمیم میگرفتم که استریت امتحان بدم یا اول وارد طرح بشم بعد. اینم تصمیم سختی بود، چون از یه طرف یه سری تجربیات منفی از دوران طرح شنیده بودم و از یک طرف هم یک سری تجربیات مثبت! هم آدمهایی رو میشناختم که توی طرح خیلی اذیت شدن، هم آدمهایی که توی طرحشون عشق کردن با اون شهر و محل و مردمش و کاری که میکردن. هم دوست داشتم تا وقتی حوصله و جون و استقامت ک…
❤59👍2👎2
خب فعلا تا همینجا رو داشته باشیم تا کمکم تعریف کنم و ببینیم چی شد که این دختر پر از ابهام و به دور از علاقه به رادیولوژی یک ماه دیگه قراره رزیدنت سال سوم رادیولوژی بشه🐳🩻
❤55😍8
و یک مسئلهای هم که وجود داره، اینه که درسته گاهی به سختی تصمیم میگیرم، ولی وقتی تصمیم گرفتم دل یک دله میکنم و دیگه اون پرونده رو توی ذهنم میبندم. به خودم میگم ببین تو با تجربه و معیارها و اولویتهای الانت، بعد از فکر و مشورت و توکل، بهترین تصمیمی که میتونستی بگیری رو گرفتی. پس از مسیرت توی این تصمیم نهایت لذت رو ببر. دیگه نیا با شرایط الان، تصمیم اون موقعت رو قضاوت کن که این این قضاوت فاقد انصاف و اعتباره. یه س…
❤49
و حتی یک بازهای از اینکه باید تصمیم بگیرم میخوام مهاجرت کنم یا نه، شبها توی بالشتم گریه میکردم! میگفتم نکنه مهاجرت نکنم و بمونم و بسوزم؟ نکنه خوشبخت نشم؟ یعنی حتی یک بازهای درگیر اینکه مهاجرت بکنم یا نکنم هم بودم و نهایتا فهمیدم، اون احساس خوشبختی و رضایت از زندگی، یک حس درونیه که درسته شرایط محیطی خیلی خیلی روش تاثیر میگذارن، اما کمال بلوغ در اینه که احساس از درون نشئت بگیره نه از بیرون و به این فکر کردم که حتی…
❤57
دوراهی اولم، سر این بود که اصلا رزیدنتی آری یا خیر! من تقریبا از همون اول میدونستم که دلم میخواد متخصص بشم. یه دفترچه آرزوها دارم که مال ابتدای دوران دانشجویی عمومیه، و اولین آرزویی که توش نوشتم اینه " آرزو میکنم رزیدنت بشم":))) چون من کار به وسعت دریا و به عمق یک سانت که عملا توی جیپی اتفاق میفته رو دوست نداشتم، دوست داشتم وارد یه حیطه بشم، توی یه گروه از متخصصین یه رشته و اونجا سری تو سرها دربیارم. اما اون تایمی…
❤38
اما خب، اگه بخوام از مسیر خودم بگم، باید بگم که پر از شک و ابهام و دو دلی بود. و من هی بین راههای مختلف گیر میافتادم و نمیدونستم کدوم رو انتخاب کنم. چرا؟ چون همه چیز رو با هم میخواستم. میخواستم همه چیز ایدئال باشه. ولی دنیا به این مدار نمیچرخه. همیشه یک نقصانی هست و فارغ از اون، هر به دست آوردنی، یه از دست دادنی داره. هر دستاوردی یه هزینهای داره که اگه تا قرون آخرش رو نپردازی، از اوم دستاورد خبری نیست. دستاورد…
❤29👍2
این رشتهپیامها رو که خوندم، حس کردم یه عالمه از دغدغههای قدیمیم مثل تخمشربتیهای تهگرفته توی شربت یخچال خونهی مادربزرگ ، هَم خوردن و اومدن بالا و یادم افتاد که من خودم چقدر تک تک این دغدغهها رو هزار بار زندگی کردم و ترسیدم و بالا پایین کردم تا تونستم تصمیم بگیرم و خدا لطف کرد و تصمیمی که "درستِ من" بود رو گرفتم...
❤45
دکتر الف گفت: عاشق چیزای جنرالی. عاشق چیزای گسترده. یه دریا میخوای که حسابی توش شنا کنی. اینا از تو یه اینترنیست فوق العاده میسازه.
❤10
دکتر چ میگفت: رزیدنتایی که رفتن طرح و بعد میان داخلی و اطفال، آدمای پرتجربهتر و موفقترین. من خودم بیشتر میتونم روشون حساب کنم، بهشون اعتماد کنم. نسبت به جوجه دکتری که از اینترنی پریده اومده رزیدنتی.
❤12
دکتر الف میگفت: اگه مستقیم بری رزیدنتی و بعدش مثلا اتند شی توی جایی مثل پایتخت به جای ۴سال باید ۸ سال در خدمت سیستم باشی و طرحت ۸ساله میشه. البته که اگه هیئت علمی باشی زیاد فرقی نمیکنه ۴سال با ۸سال.
❤9🐳1
دکتر چ میگفت: میدونی همه این فکرا از چیه؟ گفتم: از چی؟ گفت: تو جوونیهای خود منی ریحانه. مشتاق، جاه طلب و پر از کمال گرایی. همه اینا از کمالگراییه. حالتو میفهمم چون منم همچین روزایی رو درست مثل تو گذروندم. از ترم ۷ منو با ماسک با دکتر چ اشتباه میگرفتن. بس که چشم و ابرومون شبیه همه. بس که هم قد و قوارهایم. ولی فکرشو نمیکردم یه روزی خودش اعتراف کنه که چقدر وقتی همسن من بوده، شبیه من بوده. قلبمو تکون داد با این ح…
❤13
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @medlights. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 504,091 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Medlight 💡” (@medlights), 2,383 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/medlights.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.