Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Medical Ксю

Channel

Medical Ксю

@medicalksu

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,767subscribers

+120 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001097289882
TypeChannel
Username@medicalksu
Created24 September 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/medicalksu

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,62712,87012,748.55 August 2026 — 12,647 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,647 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,643 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,640 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,634 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,627 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,632 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,700 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,711 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,701 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,690 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,685 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,684 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,679 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,680 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,687 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,695 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,688 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,684 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,677 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,702 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,759 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,758 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,755 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,753 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,750 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,744 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,736 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,727 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,719 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,714 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,708 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,707 subscribers19 September 2026 — 12,706 subscribers25 September 2026 — 12,681 subscribers4 October 2026 — 12,667 subscribers8 October 2026 — 12,813 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,852 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,870 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,867 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,863 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,857 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,850 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,846 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,844 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,835 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,829 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,822 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,818 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,815 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,805 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,806 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,802 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,797 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,786 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,780 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,772 subscribers6 November 2026 — 12,768 subscribers7 November 2026 — 12,767 subscribers12,7675 August 20267 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 93 days, net +120. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,591–12,906 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 09:1612,767-1
6 Nov 2026, 11:1712,768-4
5 Nov 2026, 11:0512,772-8
4 Nov 2026, 07:5012,780-6
3 Nov 2026, 06:4512,786-11
2 Nov 2026, 04:0812,797-5
31 Oct 2026, 00:4612,802-4
30 Oct 2026, 02:1712,806+1
29 Oct 2026, 05:3112,805-10
28 Oct 2026, 06:2712,815-3
27 Oct 2026, 06:2912,818-4
25 Oct 2026, 04:2712,822-7
24 Oct 2026, 00:5512,829-6
23 Oct 2026, 00:0912,835-9
21 Oct 2026, 21:3012,844-2
20 Oct 2026, 18:0012,846-4
19 Oct 2026, 14:1012,850-7
18 Oct 2026, 13:1812,857-6
16 Oct 2026, 13:3512,863-4
15 Oct 2026, 13:5412,867first reading

Engagement

93 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.14%
avg views ÷ 12,767 subscribers
Avg views / post
784
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.448%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 93 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held93 (27 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total18,816
Reactions total62
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 07:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
49s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

611 reactions across 68 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤23839.0%
👍22136.2%
🔥548.84%
😁498.02%
👏142.29%
😡71.15%
⚡50.818%
🤔50.818%
❤‍🔥40.655%
👌40.655%
😢40.655%
😱40.655%
🤯20.327%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 74 of the 93 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 623 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.38%
5 of 93 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
5
posts carrying an erid · 5 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
789
over 5 measured posts
Median views · rest
801
over 87 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjdcumY7126 August 202626 August 2026
2SDnje8sfwR127 August 202627 August 2026
2Vtzqw51rTV120 August 202620 August 2026
2W5zFGwTa3T119 August 202619 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqUgKWuswibSAikvza4ZcpNBxSyKT9H5Tv7jTT13 August 20263 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (8.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 06:38 UTC445 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026

#телемедицина Терапевт на удалёнке: в России меняют правила оказания терапевтической помощи Российские терапевты смогут дистанционно наблюдать пациентов с гипертонией и сахарным диабетом. Минздрав подготовил проект нового порядка оказания медицинской помощи взрослым, который должен заменить действующие с 2012 года правила. Документ проходит общественное обсуждение, а вступление в силу запланировано на 1 января 2027…

👍2

5 Nov 2026, 11:52 UTC535 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#ИИ #ихнравы В лечении отказано: в США разгорается скандал вокруг ИИ-сервиса для государственной системы медицинского страхования В США в рамках эксперимента частным компаниям разрешили использовать искусственный интеллект (ИИ) для проверки обоснованности медицинских услуг по программе государственного медицинского страхования Medicare. За первые три месяца 2026 года один из подрядчиков, Virtix Health, отклонил 53%…

❤2

5 Nov 2026, 06:01 UTC524 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026

#цифровизация #сервисы Бабушки и дедушки обогнали молодёжь: в Москве цифровой медициной активнее всего пользуются пенсионеры Неожиданные результаты исследования НИУ ВШЭ и Центра социального проектирования «Платформа»: 86% москвичей старше 60 лет пользуются цифровыми медицинскими сервисами. Это самый высокий показатель среди всех возрастных групп. Для сравнения: среди молодёжи 18–24 лет таких пользователей только 78…

🔥1

3 Nov 2026, 11:37 UTC689 views6 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#отсебя Пациент всегда прав. Особенно если хирург — ChatGPT. @medicalksu теперь в MAX

👏3😁3

3 Nov 2026, 11:12 UTC533 views0 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @mediamedics

⚡️ Суд взыскал с аптечного поставщика 2,63 млрд рублей за роботов, которые путали таблетки и повреждали лекарства Арбитражный суд Москвы взыскал с ООО «Хайер Электрикал Эпплаенсис Рус» в пользу «Гормедтехники» более 2,63 млрд рублей. Роботоаптеки предназначались для девяти больниц столицы, но к установленному сроку их не ввели в эксплуатацию. Во время опытной эксплуатации в журналах зафиксировали более 1300 ошибок. …

3 Nov 2026, 09:47 UTC658 viewsread 7 November 2026

#телемедицина В реабилитацию на дому планируют добавить телемедицину В России предлагают расширить возможности телемедицины для пациентов, проходящих медицинскую реабилитацию на дому. Минздрав включил соответствующую норму в проект программы государственных гарантий бесплатной медицинской помощи на 2027 год. Это позволит пациентам получать консультации медицинских работников дистанционно в рамках программы реабилит…

2 Nov 2026, 14:55 UTC586 viewsread 7 November 2026

#цифровизация #ихнравы Почти полмиллиарда долларов за сомнительный результат? В Великобритании проверяют эффективность цифровизации здравоохранения В Великобритании разгорается скандал вокруг одного из крупнейших проектов цифровизации здравоохранения. Речь о платформе Federated Data Platform (FDP), которую для Национальной службы здравоохранения (NHS) разрабатывает американская компания Palantir. Стоимость контракт…

2 Nov 2026, 14:18 UTC485 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @minzdrav_ruPhoto

🔬 Вадим Ваньков: В России зарегистрировано 61 медизделие с искусственным интеллектом Об этом замминистра здравоохранения РФ Вадим Ваньков сообщил в ходе сессии «Рецепт на ИИ: дозировка, показания и противопоказания» в рамках 5-го Национального конгресса «Национальное здравоохранение 2026». Он отметил, что в России сегодня зарегистрировано 61 медизделие с ИИ, однако ключевая задача заключается не только в расширении…

❤2😁1

2 Nov 2026, 07:22 UTC644 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#роботы #ихнравы Роботы научились пересаживать волосы, делать массаж и искать «меридианы»: в Китае показали медицину будущего На 94-й Китайской международной выставке медицинского оборудования (CMEF) в Пекине представили целую серию роботов для здравоохранения — от роботов для хирургии до роботизированного массажа. Один из самых необычных экспонатов — HAIRO, робот для пересадки волос, получивший регистрационное удо…

1 Nov 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,050 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#отсебя Диагностика в 2026 году — Доктор, что показало МРТ? — Пока только рекламу подписки. @medicalksu

😁3❤1

30 Oct 2026, 14:28 UTC812 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026

#ИИ #мероприятия #цифровизация Эксперты: прежде чем внедрять искусственный интеллект (ИИ), медицинской организации нужен «техосмотр» Чтобы ИИ мог анализировать показания медицинского оборудования, сначала нужно наладить их сбор. Этому посвятили сессию «Прежде чем ИИ» на Kazan Digital Week 2026, которую собрал ИТ-холдинг Т1. Заместитель генерального директора по программно-аппаратным решениям Т1 Михаил Книгин расск…

👍3

30 Oct 2026, 08:05 UTC774 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026

#ИИ #ВОЗ #ихнравы ВОЗ представила дорожную карту развития искусственного интеллекта (ИИ) в здравоохранении Государства Европейского региона ВОЗ, объединяющего страны Европы и Центральной Азии, единогласно приняли первую региональную дорожную карту по ИИ в здравоохранении. Документ рассчитан на 2026–2033 годы. Его поддержали 53 страны на 76-й сессии Европейского регионального комитета ВОЗ. Цель — сделать применение …

❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 93 posts we hold for @medicalksu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @medicalksu as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
15 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
15 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 51 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Медач | Medical Channel
@medach · 27,949
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Мурашко по коже 🩺🏥
@murashko_med · 131,762
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Минздрав России
@minzdrav_ru · 53,184
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
Поясни за мед
@poyasni_za_med · 22,218
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 September 2026
Без рецепта
@bezrec · 32,017
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 5 September 2026
Медицинская Россия
@mediamedics · 142,984
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Genotek
@genotek · 22,406
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Medical Ксю” (@medicalksu), 12,767 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/medicalksu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.