Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Громкая роскошь

@sasharedtv

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,763subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001568193947
TypeChannel
Username@sasharedtv
DescriptionАвторский канал стилистки Саши Ред. Перья, пайетки, каждый день как праздник! 18+ По рекламе @sashared Одна из всадниц @dosug_inthecity Включен в реестр РКН https://clck.ru/3JwLTp
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sasharedtv

Growth

13,75913,79213,775.56 August 2026 — 13,763 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,763 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,759 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,773 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,790 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,792 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,776 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,769 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,763 subscribers13,7636 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,754–13,797 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:5813,763-6
12 Aug 2026, 13:3313,769-7
11 Aug 2026, 13:4613,776-16
10 Aug 2026, 13:2513,792+2
9 Aug 2026, 12:4113,790+17
8 Aug 2026, 09:3413,773+14
7 Aug 2026, 12:5813,759-4
6 Aug 2026, 13:0013,763no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:5213,763first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 13,763 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,590
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held18 (3 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total28,540
Reactions total983
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9,900
Videos
581
Links
361

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 32s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

983 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥56257.2%
🥰20921.3%
😁13513.7%
🎉505.09%
😨272.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 983reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC920 views28 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

В рубрике #сумкадня сегодня просто бамболео от Gucci (причем в обе походу даже ноут влезет). Няшмилаш слева 41.998₽, полосатик справа 37.246₽.

❤‍🔥21😁4🥰3

11 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC≈1,320 views58 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Лук дня не на люксах, а на каких-то спортивных началах (хотя вообще-то ездила в кино, а не на спортик) Лонг и шорты IRNBY, кепка Феррари, кеды адидас

❤‍🔥46🥰7😁5

11 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC≈1,480 views56 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Это 10/10. Ничего от нее не ожидала, включила аудиокнигу в машине, пока ехала по делам. Оказалась просто ЖЁСТКО интересная, прям хочется теперь её в печатной версии домой, чтобы потом возвращаться даже. О том, как наш мозг хранит информацию, почему важно положительно о себе думать, как «расслаиваются» личности и получаются психотклонения. Это было и любопытно, и понятным языком, и нисколько не нудно. После нее откры

❤‍🔥40🥰10🎉4😁2

11 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC≈1,530 views51 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Говорящая тарелочка из андердога для плохого настроения с утра 😁

🥰42❤‍🔥6😁3

10 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC≈1,620 views100 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Это мы с королевишной в выходной на бранч ездили. Я принарядилась, а она просто родилась роскошью 💅🏻

❤‍🔥77🎉12🥰11

10 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC≈1,740 views49 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

С локацией для переезда всё понятно стало (это Беверли-Хиллз)

❤‍🔥23😁16😨10

10 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC≈1,680 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Это самые удобные сандалии на свете!!! Пару лет назад я заказала себе такие розовые, до сих пор ношу их каждый день дважды на выгул собачки, а им хоть бы хны. Ecco выдали ещё парочку обновить мой обувной парк.

❤‍🔥41🎉8😁5

10 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC≈1,790 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Боже, ну почему я не увидела этот пост раньше, когда плавилась от жары! Сохраняем на будущее: охлаждающие банки для наших косметичек, настоящее спасение в жару 🫠

❤‍🔥9🎉4🥰2

10 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC≈1,300 views44 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Сумка-лифчик против сумки-попы от бренда kaittitude. Какую берём?

😁31❤‍🔥10🎉3

8 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC≈1,640 views43 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Прочитала Бруклин и сначала возмутилась всем: какой-то оборванной концовкой, тухлой героиней, ещё худшим (судя по отзывам) продолжением. А потом села и подумала, какой же автор гений, так прописать героиню, которая аж бесит своей амёбностью)) История про ирландскую девушку пятидесятых годов, столкнувшейся с эмиграцией в Америку, а потом и бедами на родине. Читается легко, эмоции однозначно вызывает, и даже хочется к

😁23❤‍🔥13🥰7

8 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC≈1,610 views34 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Утро начнем с рубрики находок #сумкадня как у меня: Louis Vuitton за 53.825₽. Она кстати КАПЕЦ какая вместительная, я хожу с ней на йогу (влезает форма, книжка, бутыль воды и большие наушники), вот вживую в посте выше

❤‍🔥24😨7🎉3

7 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC≈1,700 views53 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Пятничное вдохновение приехало!

❤‍🔥38🎉10🥰5

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @sasharedtv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 80,045 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Громкая роскошь” (@sasharedtv), 13,763 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sasharedtv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.