Официальный канал МАРМАЖА! Тут у нас всякое)
По вопросам рекламы: @Neznanov_Igor
Включен РКН в перечень персональных страниц: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=676c59354e740947bebafaff®istryType=bloggersPermission
Created
3 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61,652–61,715 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 11:25
61,668
+2
12 Aug 2026, 11:33
61,666
+7
11 Aug 2026, 12:46
61,659
-7
10 Aug 2026, 13:03
61,666
-4
9 Aug 2026, 10:51
61,670
-23
8 Aug 2026, 07:22
61,693
-15
7 Aug 2026, 08:34
61,708
+1
7 Aug 2026, 05:15
61,707
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
41.1%
avg views ÷ 61,668 subscribers
Avg views / post
25,400
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
20 (2 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
152,100
Reactions total
9,210
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
141
Videos
14
Links
49
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
29,359 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
16,464
56.1%
🔥
4,881
16.6%
😁
2,447
8.33%
🥰
2,309
7.86%
👍
1,923
6.55%
😭
894
3.05%
😱
287
0.978%
😐
78
0.266%
🎉
42
0.143%
🤔
34
0.116%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29,359reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 20 we hold a reading for · 65%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @maxmarmazh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Тряска по Призраку в доспехах
Сейчас выходит новое аниме по Призраку в доспехах. И это замечательный проект, мне лично очень залетает каждая серия.
Но! По глупости я залез в комменты, а там ад: "Что это за рисовка для детей?", "Оригинал был лучше!", "Это издевательство над первоисточником", не выкупая, что это и есть прямая адаптация первоисточника, блин! Манга именно такая и была - там Кусанаги не ходит с безжизне…
2023 год.
Я на стендапе Димы Коваля в Самаре. Выступление подходит к концу и мы с женой решили посидеть в зале минут 10, пока очередь в гардеробе. В этот момент Коваль выходит из-за кулис, садится напротив меня и начинает со мной болтать. Оказалось, что он меня знает.
На фото я пытаюсь сделать вид, что это абсолютно нормальная ситуация, но я безумно стесняюсь и мне прям сильно не по себе. Я буквально не понимаю, ку…
Как же я ненавижу одноразки. Это просто проклятье какое-то...
Я курю 20 лет, из которых последние 5 - это сраные дулки. Мне кажется, я просто уже не выпускаю эту хрень из рук. Я с ней работаю, я с ней отдыхаю, я с ней ложусь спать, я с ней просыпаюсь. И из-за этого спрыгнуть с неё становится почти непосильной задачей. Какие-то там инициативы по поводу ограничения продажи - это чуть ли не единственный запрет, который…
2013 год.
Тут мне почти 23 года. Одна из моих первых попыток влететь на ютуб с каналом про похудение. Несмотря на то, что канал не залетел, к последнему выпуску я сбросил 30 кг и меня пригласили на местное самарское тв рассказать об этом (собственно, этот упоротый скрин оттуда).
Прикол в том, что худел я максимально неправильно. Каждый выпуск я проверял на себе экстремальные диеты: то неделю ел одну гречку, то пил …
Блин, я что-то так угорел по ролику, что эта неделя просто пролетела. Только сейчас понял, что опять понедельник и надо продолжать рубрику.
(На этой неделе буду нормально постить в тг, сорян)
2006 год.
Мне только-только исполнилось 16 лет. Я, как обычно, торчу за компом и пытаюсь в анимацию. Впереди 11 класс и я начинаю задумываться, чем же я буду заниматься дальше. Юношеский максимализм толкает меня к не самым очевидным решениям (особенно в понимании моих родителей)
Под влиянием феномена flash-мультфильмов я мечтаю сделать какой-нибудь известный мультсериал.
Ещё мне очень нравится всё, что связанно с д…
2022 год.
Как-то Содерлинг прислал мне коллекционное издание игры Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Shredder's Revenge. Помимо диска и коллекционной атрибутики, в коробке лежала синяя повязка Леонардо! 🐢
На этой фотографии я и мой друг Саня играем в игру, едим пиццу (ну, Черепашки-ниндзя же), а я ещё не подозреваю, что надетая для антуража повязка вызовет у меня аллергическую реакцию.
Может быть дело было в красителе, …
А чё, до сих пор идёт сражение айфонов против андроидов? Для кого-то это всё ещё имеет значение? Кто-то до сих пор пытается определить свой статус через носимый гаджет?
Я думал, что это закончилось лет 10 назад 😐
Официально: после поездки к родителям я теперь больше малиновый пирог, чем человек
🥰1,690😁423❤261🔥59👍19
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @maxmarmazh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
JOHAN @JOHAN_telega · 159,799 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
Marmok_yt @marmok_yt · 479,729 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
Metalfamily официальный канал @metalfamily_news · 222,566 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МАРМАЖ” (@maxmarmazh), 61,668 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maxmarmazh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
