Channel
@Sheikhfathialmousli
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,962subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001135783164 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Sheikhfathialmousli |
| Created | Between 1 May 2017 and 31 July 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Sheikhfathialmousli |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 1,962 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 1,965 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 1,965 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
*المقدمة الثامنة* : أن العبرة في هذا الباب بالنظر الجزئي والحكم التفصيلي على كل حديث من خلال الوقوف على القرائن التي تحتف بطرق الحديث ؛ وهل هي تصلح لتقوية الحديث أم لا ؟ وهل تقْوَى هذه الطرق على رفع علة إنفراد راويه أو احتمال غلطه أو توهمه ؛ إذ تقوية الحديث بتعدد طرقه راجع في الغالب إلى النظر في القرائن ؛ ومن القرائن المفيدة للحكم على الحديث بالصحة أو الحسن النظر في أمور ثلاثة *أولها* : عمل الفقهاء بالحديث ؛ فجريان ا…
#الفائدة :(733) (فَوَائدُ مِنْ مَجَالسِ شَيْخِنَا أَبِي عَبْدِاللهِ فَتْحِي المَوْصِلْيّ حَفِظَهُ اللهُ). مقدمات علمية : حديثيّة وأصوليّة في تحسين الحديث بتعدد طرقه *المقدمة الأولى* : الحكم على الخبر بالصحة والقبول إنما يكون بحسب أمرين : بحسب صفات ناقليه ، وبحسب تعدد طرقه ؛ وبالتالي القول بعدم التصحيح أو التحسين بتعدد الطرق قادح في أصول الرواية في الدين ومصادم للعقل والعادة . *المقدمة الثانية* : أن طلب التعدد ي…
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87665170406?pwd=HleVmJqiVaXmBtFzgTFWIpRlauRBCZ.1 السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته ، رابط محاضرة الشيخ فتحي الموصلي - وفقه الله- نأمل نشره بين طلاب العلم فالدال على الخير كفاعله ، وتفضلوا بالدخول المحاضرة تبدأ الساعة الثامنة
وسوف نرسل رابط المحاضرة قبل الموعد بربع ساعة ان شاء الله
Sticker, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
https://youtu.be/3mxsoj2Rx34?si=NWmw8XNz0hO1z1YF
من لا يشكر القليل لا يشكر الكثير! الشيخ :فتحي الموصلي
https://youtu.be/dW9NTr0Kj8I?si=CgLR9fbiMcVrpShf
https://youtu.be/_iNegnYweYk?si=5nUsXTIQK6tsrxz0
والمحاضرات لها بث مباشر نرسله لكم ان شاء الله
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Sheikhfathialmousli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,003,467 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@Sheikhfathialmousli named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة فوائد الشيخ فتحي الموصلي” (@Sheikhfathialmousli), 1,962 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sheikhfathialmousli.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.