Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Комфортный ЗОЖ

@matveylive

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,143subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001113225643
TypeChannel
Username@matveylive
DescriptionЗОЖ не должен быть насилием, он должен быть в кайф, без жестких ограничений и преодолений. И здесь я рассказываю, как этого добиться. А также делаю обзоры современных исследований, делюсь опытом и разбираю мифы. Присоединяйтесь 📌ЛC: @matveysmir
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 December 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/matveylive

Growth

6,1436,1486,145.57 August 2026 — 6,148 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,144 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,143 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,142–6,149 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 02:016,143-1
8 Aug 2026, 08:126,144-4
7 Aug 2026, 09:456,148first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.0%
avg views ÷ 6,143 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,230
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (11 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total19,684
Reactions total516
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
446
Videos
65
Links
459

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

578 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥22438.8%
14124.4%
😁529.00%
🤝498.48%
👍366.23%
custom 4958563601775330153284.84%
💯233.98%
🎉111.90%
61.04%
❤‍🔥50.865%
🙏30.519%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 578reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @matveylive. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC≈1,160 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я и Сергей Лазарев шутка. Но друг и правда похож 😁

😁50❤‍🔥53💯2custom 49585636017753301531

6 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC≈1,270 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Подводя итог: лучшая профилактика отёков — нормализация веса, контроль потребления натрия и физическая активность. Всё остальное либо преувеличено, либо вовсе выдумано.

🤝312custom 49585636017753301531

6 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC≈1,150 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

16🔥6custom 49585636017753301533

6 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC≈1,100 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

18🔥5custom 49585636017753301534

6 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC≈1,040 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

А будет ли как то влиять на оттеки избыточная жировая ткань? Ну то есть, если у человека есть лишний вес, то будут ли отеки появлятся чаще и больше? И будут ли они менее эффективно проходить, даже если человек двигается?

👍9custom 49585636017753301531

5 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC≈1,080 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥195custom 49585636017753301532

5 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC≈1,020 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥175custom 49585636017753301531

5 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC957 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥188custom 49585636017753301531

5 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC876 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Матвей, было бы интересно послушать от тебя про связь питания и отёков (например, отекает лицо по утрам, но проблем со здоровьем нет и лишнего веса тоже). можно ли на это как-то влиять через питание и/или что-то ещё?

💯6custom 49585636017753301532

5 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC901 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[Дайджест за май, июнь и июль] Материалов было немного, но если что-то пропустили, вы знаете, что делать: • Почему в теме питания так много противоречий даже среди учёных • Правительство РФ утвердило рекомендации для ЗОЖ (нет) • Простуда — это не холод, или гайд о том, как не быть идиотом • Индустрии здоровья для богатых • Почему после сомнительных процедур РЕАЛЬНО становится лучше • Ода хорошим людям • Главн

🔥16👍82custom 49585636017753301532

2 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC≈1,190 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кухонные разговоры, чтобы заполнить паузу в контенте. Но долгой паузы не будет, обещаю.

🤝188🔥5custom 49585636017753301532

2 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC≈1,290 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Да, идея, что люди будут умело обращаться к нейронкам за валидными ответами, скорее, чересчур оптимистична) Не стоит забывать, что мы сейчас обсуждаем силу искусственного интеллекта в эпоху, когда вот-вот научатся использовать термоядерную энергию и редактирование генома эмбрионов, а всё это соседствует с… астрологией, представлениями о плоской Земле и боязнью химии. Технологии шагнули вперёд, но мозги, взаимодейств

🔥29👍11💯53🙏1custom 49585636017753301531

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @matveylive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

BIOMACHINE
@bmchn · 174,941
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
Руслан Масгутов
@rusmasgutov · 145,345
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Комфортный ЗОЖ” (@matveylive), 6,143 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/matveylive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.