Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ПРОСТУДИО | PROSTUDIO.NET | Техничка видеопродакшена

@prostudio_net

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

406subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001966794342
TypeChannel
Username@prostudio_net
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/prostudio_net

Growth

406407406.56 August 2026 — 407 subscribers6 August 2026 — 407 subscribers12 August 2026 — 406 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 406–407 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:24406-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:33407no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:07407first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 17 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.6%
avg views ÷ 406 subscribers
Avg views / post
87.5
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held18 (17 April 202628 July 2026)
Views total350
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2547.2%
🔥2037.7%
👍713.2%
🎉11.89%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 09:41 UTC74 viewsread 6 August 2026

Приглашаем всех на прямой эфир с президентом НАОМ Юлией Жоля, будет интересно!

28 Jul 2026, 09:41 UTC75 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @worldofeventPhoto

📹 Прямой эфир: Событие года 2027. Что готовит нам новый сезон? #ВэфиреНАОМ вместе с Юлией Жоля, президентом НАОМ и продюсером «События года», обсудим сезон 2027 года. Спойлер: нового будет много! 🗓 30 июля ⏰ 17:00 МСК Разберем: — как будет проходить новый сезон; — как раскрыть сильные стороны события в заявке; — как будет устроено кураторство номинантов. Эфир будет полезен и тем, кто впервые готовит заявку, и те

28 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC97 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Онлайн-трансляция как бизнес: 17 млн ₽ в год. Не спонсорство — чистые продажи доступов. Большинство организаторов считает онлайн «лишними костами», которые в лучшем случае выходят в ноль. У Алексея Никушина (Матемаркетинг, AHA) это 20–25% всей билетной выручки. Полтора часа он раскладывает свою модель с цифрами, которые организаторы не называют даже друг другу. Таймкоды: 02:31 — Цифры: 110–120 млн выручки, онлайн =

2👍2

23 Jul 2026, 06:01 UTC104 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

«Один зритель онлайн или сто - одна и та же стоимость». Полтора часа цифр, которые организаторы не называют даже друг другу. Полный выпуск - Скоро на всех площадках! 17 млн ₽ в год на онлайн-трансляциях конференций Алексей Никушин (Матемаркетинг, AHA) — о том, как онлайн приносит деньги, а не съедает бюджет. Полный выпуск — по ссылке в профиле / в закрепе. #ивент #конференции #онлайнтрансляция #подкаст

1👍1🔥1

16 Jun 2026, 15:33 UTC125 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Откроем секрет, мы набираем наш персонал под конкретный проект, у нас есть пул наших постоянных сотрудников, которые с нами из проекта в проект. И для нас крайне важно знать, что это те люди, в которых мы можем быть уверены на 100%. Потому что да, персонал - это тоже клиентский опыт, и он должен быть безупречным. Подключаетесь к эфиру, подискутируем вместе!

2

16 Jun 2026, 15:33 UTC157 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @worldofeventPhoto

📹 Прямой эфир: Ошибки в работе с временным персоналом, которые стоят бюджету миллионов Временный персонал — это люди, которые первыми встречают гостей, помогают с навигацией, решают вопросы на площадке и напрямую влияют на впечатление о бренде. 25 июня в #ВэфиреНАОМ обсудим, почему экономия на персонале может обернуться репутационными и финансовыми потерями, какие ошибки чаще всего допускают организаторы и как выст

🔥2👍1

5 Jun 2026, 10:50 UTC103 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Уже в следующий четверг мы проведём новый прямой эфир для НАОМ, присоединяйтесь!

5 Jun 2026, 10:50 UTC131 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @worldofeventPhoto

📹 Прямой эфир: Как ивент-агентству обойтись без блокировок счета и доначислений ФНС Выплаты в ивенте — отдельная зона риска для агентств. В проектах часто задействованы разные исполнители, подрядчики и специалисты, а сами процессы не всегда похожи на классический B2B-бизнес. #ВэфиреНАОМ разберем, что изменилось в 2026 году и почему вопросы выплат стали особенно важны для ивент-команд. 📅 11 июня ⏰ 17:00 МСК Обсуди

🔥1

5 May 2026, 13:36 UTC151 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @eventpuzyrevVideo

Каждый год мы открываем «Сцену» с пролога — номера открытия. И каждый год это вызов. Потому что аудитория — не обычные зрители. Это создатели событий. Люди, которые видели сотни шоу. Удивить их — почти невозможно. Особенно когда сжаты сроки, бюджет и время на репетиции. В прошлый раз мы сыграли на иронии — посмеялись над шаблонными прологами вместе со зрителями. Сработало. В этом году хотелось чего-то совсем друго

1🎉1🔥1

5 May 2026, 13:35 UTC127 viewsread 6 August 2026

Всегда очень радостно быть частью крутых событий и высокопрофессиональных команд! 😎

26 Apr 2026, 18:03 UTC151 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Кстати, гости нашей Открытой студии на Sold Out уже активно делятся своими интервью 😉 Например, вот наша беседа с Кириллом Радченко

👍1

26 Apr 2026, 18:03 UTC172 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @bardivisionVideo

Недавно выкладывали тизер, а сейчас публикую полноценное интервью. В нем: • про интеллектуальные игры в целом • о начале Барного Дивизиона и сообществе • про создание и проведение деловых событий • немного про деньги и риски, развитие команды Вообще, вью больше про меня и работу и в меньшей степени про БД. Но контент познавательный - я на самом деле мало говорю о работе =) Съемка: @prostudio_net С Федей и его кома

4🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @prostudio_net. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 139,150 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПРОСТУДИО | PROSTUDIO.NET | Техничка видеопродакшена” (@prostudio_net), 406 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prostudio_net.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.