Channel
@mark_ramie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
284subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001887270970 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mark_ramie |
| Description | Марк Абраменко — Mobile Engineer & Engineering Manager Rhino / ex. Head of Flutter в Surf |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mark_ramie |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 284 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 284 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (8 May 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,506 |
| Reactions total | 72 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
242 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5350739384855439299 | 42 | 17.4% | |
| custom 5312382019777338425 | 29 | 12.0% | |
| ❤ | 29 | 12.0% | |
| custom 4997289389148079171 | 24 | 9.92% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 9.09% | |
| custom 4997166218075964355 | 18 | 7.44% | |
| custom 5832636231590087941 | 18 | 7.44% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 6.20% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 4.96% | |
| custom 5300873556123460152 | 11 | 4.55% | |
| custom 5474454951449075984 | 9 | 3.72% | |
| custom 5936233613023513617 | 9 | 3.72% | |
| ✍ | 4 | 1.65% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 242reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Это потрясающе. Мало того, что вайбкодеры это уже по умолчанию более высокая ступень эволюции. Так они ещё и накачают огромную челюсть с острыми скулами и будут моггать омега сойджаков классических кодеров 😎 https://t.me/xor_journal/9775
custom 58326362315900879417custom 53123820197773384252custom 53507393848554392991
⚡️ 11 августа проводим в Москве Agentic AI Dev Meetup. Мы в Bitmanager.ai создаём платформу для автономных коммуникационных AI-агентов и постоянно сталкиваемся с вопросами, на которые у индустрии пока нет окончательных ответов. Разработка AI-агентов сейчас просто кипит: появляются новые архитектуры и фреймворки, лучшие практики формируются прямо на наших глазах, а граница между обычным LLM-приложением и действитель…
custom 53507393848554392994custom 53123820197773384253custom 59362336130235136172custom 49972893891480791711
Трудно поверить своим глазам, но кажется маленькая инди-компания Майкрософт наконец-то реализовала stacked пулл реквесты в Github Возможно, ещё чуть-чуть и они реализруют нормальные аттачи, хотя бы на уровне PHPBB-форумов из нулевых https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/get-started/about-stacked-prs
custom 53123820197773384256
Как называется человек, который пишет промпт и наблюдает за тем, как работают агенты Клода? Куклод
custom 583263623159008794111custom 49971662180759643557✍4custom 53123820197773384251
Молодцы https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5
custom 49972893891480791715
Осталось то же самое сделать с клодом и психика будет здорова
👍12custom 49972893891480791716
YouTube в России вырос даже с ограничениями https://naked-science.ru/article/media/youtube-v-rossii-vyros Как ни забавно, но по-моему он вырос именно из-за блокировок, а не вопреки Полгода назад заблочили Телеграмм и Ватсапп и одновременно с этим запретили вход с VPN в часть российских сервисов То есть, если раньше люди могли не заходить в единичные сервисы, потому что лень включать VPN, то сейчас лень его выключ…
custom 53507393848554392998😁2
Ничто не заставляет много работать так, как последние дни Fable 5. Я зря пытался выжимать все соки из него последние два дня Антропики продлили доступ к нему до 12 июля, а это значит, что я не только смогу починить кран, но и повесить люстру на выходных https://x.com/claudeai/status/2074548242386178258
👍4custom 54744549514490759844custom 49971662180759643553
Не уверен, что Fable 5 прям так хорош для кодинга, как описывают, но кран на кухне починить помог
😁9custom 53507393848554392996custom 54744549514490759845❤4
В айтишке есть целый глоссарий из канцеляризмов и корпоративного булщита вроде "проактивность", "развивающий фидбек", "эскалировать" Надо перестать заниматься хернёй и брать пример с терминологии судоходства. Там есть, например, флот прикольный и отстойный В состав отстойного флота не включают суда прикольного флота и плавсредства, на которых идут ремонтные мероприятия, реконструкция и/или переоборудование. Когда …
❤8custom 53507393848554392995custom 49972893891480791714😁1
Fable 5 — самое клёвое, что выходило со времён, пожалуй, релиза Опуса 4 Надеюсь, Антропики додумаются переименовать его в Опус 5 и выпустить для всех Очередное напоминание, что нужно накодить с Клодом как можно больше сейчас, пока его не отобрали целиком
custom 53123820197773384253
https://t.me/saturov_stroit_komandu/169 Самое печальное следствие из этого — команда аутсорса не занимается постоянными улучшениями продукта, что с годами приводит к жуткой деградации В здоровой продуктовой команде улучшения, рефакторинги, обновления процессов часто происходят органически. Вам не нужно согласовывать это ни с кем или выбивать бюджет. Если вы достаточно инициативный, то при снижении темпов разработки…
custom 49971662180759643554custom 59362336130235136174
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mark_ramie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 805,445 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@mark_ramie named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Оверинжиниринг менеджер” (@mark_ramie), 284 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mark_ramie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.