Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 50 days, net +329. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,472–15,899 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 17:18
15,850
+3
18 Sept 2026, 23:37
15,847
-1
16 Sept 2026, 18:18
15,848
+21
14 Sept 2026, 20:40
15,827
+36
13 Sept 2026, 06:39
15,791
+21
11 Sept 2026, 07:00
15,770
+45
8 Sept 2026, 11:40
15,725
+40
5 Sept 2026, 05:40
15,685
+18
3 Sept 2026, 10:47
15,667
+9
2 Sept 2026, 06:52
15,658
+10
1 Sept 2026, 06:13
15,648
+59
31 Aug 2026, 05:38
15,589
+6
30 Aug 2026, 03:34
15,583
+12
29 Aug 2026, 02:48
15,571
+2
27 Aug 2026, 01:02
15,569
+9
26 Aug 2026, 02:13
15,560
+4
24 Aug 2026, 22:44
15,556
-7
23 Aug 2026, 10:08
15,563
-4
21 Aug 2026, 21:19
15,567
+12
20 Aug 2026, 19:17
15,555
first reading
Engagement
144 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.4%
avg views ÷ 15,850 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,500
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 144 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
144 (3 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
103,580
Reactions total
3,259
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
11m 43s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
19,350 reactions across 137 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,487
28.4%
😁
2,894
15.0%
🔥
2,090
10.8%
🤣
1,727
8.93%
👍
1,571
8.12%
😭
1,022
5.28%
😡
1,003
5.18%
😱
1,003
5.18%
🥰
528
2.73%
🎉
385
1.99%
⚡
331
1.71%
🤪
218
1.13%
👎
185
0.956%
❤🔥
134
0.693%
🕊
116
0.599%
😘
95
0.491%
💯
90
0.465%
😨
88
0.455%
👌
78
0.403%
🤩
71
0.367%
12 further kinds
234
1.21%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 144 of the 144 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,164 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 144 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💸 Станция «Бульвар Генерала Карбышева» Рублёво-Архангельской линии за 2 дня до открытия
На всём пусковом участке Рублёво-Архангельской линии «Деловой центр» – «Бульвар Генерала Карбышева» сейчас традиционный предпусковой аврал. Идёт накатка путей 4 составами «Москва 2026»
Фотки от РМТМ
Ⓜ️ @makemetrobetter
⚡️1️⃣🚇 Разорванный в понедельник «Балтиец» на «Площади Восстания»
Беззазорное сцепное устройство разъединило два вагона в тоннеле на подъезде к станции «Площадь Восстания» Петербургского метро 31 августа. Разъединение случилось у одного из первых выпущенных составов модели «Балтиец»
Это вообще первый случай саморасцепа БСУ на вагонах новых поколений Мытищинского завода, которые комплектуются таким типом сцепки, нач…
💸 Станция «Народное Ополчение» Рублёво-Архангельской линии за 2 дня до открытия
На всём пусковом участке Рублёво-Архангельской линии «Деловой центр» – «Бульвар Генерала Карбышева» сейчас традиционный предпусковой аврал. Идёт накатка путей 4 составами «Москва 2026»
Фотки от РМТМ
Ⓜ️ @makemetrobetter
Вас тут не стояло…
Шуховскую башню всё-таки кэнсэлят, осенью начнут разбирать – и на её месте соберут новодельный металлолом
Кончил градостроительный сериал «Башня раздора», как и многие голливудские фильмы, где сюжет развивался и сохранялась интрига, но затем вскрылось, что продюсер всех трахнул.
ДГПшники Блокбастер-филы по натуре именно те самые продюсеры "старой закалки", которые движ и хэйт видят, но сидят со …
⚡️🔵🔵 «Иволга 5.0 ЦТУ» прибыла в Щербинку на испытания
Состав 091 (сквозная нумерация с моделью «4.0») перегнали на экспериментальное кольцо ВНИИЖТ в Щербинке.
В первом 11-вагонном составе пока покрашены в новую ливрею только 2 вагона – после испытаний состав докрасят окончательно
Презентация модели «5.0 ЦТУ» прошла 12 августа. Всего для проекта ЦТУ будет заказано 100 электропоездов. Новая версия имеет значительный…
💸 Предпусковая атмосфера на первом участке Рублёво-Архангельской линии
Идёт активная накатка путей 4 составами «Москва 2026»
Составы перегнали на участок «Деловой центр» – «Бульвар Генерала Карбышева» этой ночью. Открытие участка уже в эту субботу
Инфа от КТМ
Ⓜ️ @makemetrobetter
🚆 Авральная доделка нового «Серпа и Молота»
Открытие ожидается 6 сентября в рамках празднования Дня города
Многострадальный портал схода, который всё никак не доделывали, наконец-то начинают доделывать в последний момент.
По информации транспортных сервисов, перезапуск состоится 6 сентября – точно будет запущена новая платформу D4
Судя по уровню готовности путей для D2 (пока не до конца уложен и не отрихтован оди…
⚡️1️⃣🚇 Позавчерашний саморасцеп «Балтийца» на 1-й линии Петербургского метро
Беззазорное сцепное устройство разъединило два вагона в тоннеле. Разъединение случилось у одного из первых выпущенных составов модели «Балтиец»
Фотка от @traindrivers
Ⓜ️ @makemetrobetter
🚇🚎 Вновь горит автономный «Витязь»
Вагон следовал по маршруту «Т2» и загорелся на Варшавском шоссе
После марафона пожаров в середине июля было затишье, но это затишье прекращено новым пожаром, уже четвертым возгоранием автономника за последние 3 месяца
В июле власти ввели правила использования накопителей заряда на крышах – диапозон их зарядки должен быть не выше 85% и не ниже 45%
…..может всё-таки провода повеси…
Showing the 12 most recent of 144 posts we hold for @makemetrobetter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@makemetrobetter edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
31 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
PRO МЕТРО @pro_metro · 53,831 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
Из метро @iz_metro · 22,934 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
Подслушано Метро Москвы @pmmgo1 · 84,645 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
MOSCOW XXI @moskva_000 · 23,808 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026
Город для людей @gre4ark · 49,039 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 26 August 2026
Дептранс. Оперативно @DtOperativno · 113,483 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
СпецДорПроект @spetsdor · 29,290 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 8 September 2026
Подслушано электрички Москвы @electrichki · 63,815 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 21 August 2026
Московский Велофестиваль @moscowvelofest · 36,339 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 September 2026
Яндекс Карты @mapsyandex · 63,995 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
Квартирный Вопрос Москва МО @kvartv · 103,676 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Дептранс Москвы @DtRoad · 150,092 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
Москва. Было — стало @ecoyase · 20,580 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 September 2026
Темникова Юлия @temnikova_yuliya · 31,982 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026
Metro Москва @gazetametro · 21,452 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 September 2026
Балашиха | События | Новости @Balashiha_narod · 24,892 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 September 2026
Vgudok @Vgudok · 27,871 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 September 2026
Whoosh: твой транспорт для города @whooshbike · 112,684 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 September 2026
🔴🟡🟢 Города в потоке @citiesinmotion · 28,628 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026
Чат Андреевича @andreevichat · 40,889 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
Телеграмма РЖД @telerzd · 68,313 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
Город Москва @mosrutop · 92,938 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 17 August 2026
MSK1.RU | Новости Москвы | Россия @msk1_news · 112,801 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Велобайк @velobikerus · 21,814 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
2023 год в истории метрополитена(ru.wikipedia.org) “…пострадали 5 человек, один из которых — машинист{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/makemetrobetter/2506|title=Столкновение поездов на станции «Печатники» –…” read 13 September 2026
Аварии и теракты в Московском метрополитене(ru.wikipedia.org) “…пострадали 5 человек, один из которых — машинист{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/makemetrobetter/2506|title=Столкновение поездов на станции «Печатники» –…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Делай Метро лучше!” (@makemetrobetter), 15,850 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/makemetrobetter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.