Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Казан Урбанчы. Про комфортную Казань ❤️

Channel

Казан Урбанчы. Про комфортную Казань ❤️

@kazanurbanche

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,848subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001441040746
TypeChannel
Username@kazanurbanche
Created17 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kazanurbanche

Growth

1,8401,8481,8446 August 2026 — 1,841 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,841 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,840 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,845 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,842 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,848 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,839–1,849 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 18:071,848+6
12 Aug 2026, 18:571,842-3
10 Aug 2026, 04:161,845+5
6 Aug 2026, 23:211,840-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:321,841no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:561,841first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.5%
avg views ÷ 1,848 subscribers
Avg views / post
749
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total7,492
Reactions total208
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

503 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍18937.6%
13126.0%
🔥5811.5%
🤣407.95%
💩244.77%
😢234.57%
👎163.18%
💯163.18%
🤩50.994%
👨‍💻10.199%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 503reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC405 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Если уж на этом перекрестке все так неидеально, что без полос 1.7 куда надо не попасть, почему бы не расширить прямо перед самым перекрестком на одну полосу вправо за счет довольно широкого островка безопасности, полностью разведя между собой левый поворотный ряд и поворачивающий направо трамвай? Да, есть мнение, что там надо все полностью переделать целиком, но и небольшими изменениями есть что улучшить. Подпишись

👍5🔥3

Signed Jusaꞑ Ju

5 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC572 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Не хотели особо хвалиться (но будем) Урбанчы повлияло на реконструкцию этого участка Чернышевского. В нашем понимании, это зарождение в Казани проекта «Моя улица» — когда благоустройство парков мирового уровня выходит... на улицы, к линейным объектам. Очень радует, что город это заинтересовало ❤️ Остаётся последний ключик — применение Vision Zero и пешеходного приоритета при проектировании — мечтать не вредно, чем

🔥2514👍7

5 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC465 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @city_moderatorsPhoto

Ровно через неделю Enter и Кремлевская набережная проведут дискуссию «Кремлевская набережная: Как городскому пространству привлекать и удерживать внимание» в рамках платформы «Городские модераторы». На встрече эксперты обсудят, что помогает городским пространствам оставаться востребованными, как меняются ожидания посетителей и какие события, форматы и решения будут формировать интерес к Кремлевской набережной в 2026

6🔥2👍1

1 Aug 2026, 03:26 UTC794 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На видео ещё легко заметить синюю кабинку для водителей, с характерным запахом вокруг. Раз всё равно делали туалет в составе бульвара, почему не совместили туалет для водителей с туалетом для посетителей парка? Канализация, водопровод, электричество подведены, куча денег потрачена уже. И вообще эти кабинки - позор города. И демотивация людей идти в водители.

12👍5💯4

Signed Jusaꞑ Ju

30 Jul 2026, 14:10 UTC881 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Одним из моментов в реконструкции сквера Серова, по поводу которого мы не станем кого-то критиковать, но выразим сожаление, стало то, что из границ реконструкции, даже точнее так, границ создаваемого престижного и привлекательного пространства выпала автобусная остановка. Тротуары, простой транзит мимо сквера - будут сделаны в его качестве и стилистике, а зона остановки нет. Вообще то, что остановки в Казани не прир

15💯11👍2

Signed Jusaꞑ Ju

24 Jul 2026, 16:37 UTC≈1,000 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @samasebemarya

Сегодня председатель Комитета по охране объектов культурного наследия Республики Татарстан, Иван Гущин, объявил о том, что по результатам инженерного отчета, Мергасовский дом не может быть реставрирован, а должен быть снесен и воссоздан. Такое решение противоречит как законодательству об охране культурного наследия, так и самим принципам сохранения памятников. Проблема заключается не в инженерном состоянии здания, а

👍14🔥7🤣42👎1

Signed Jusaꞑ Ju

24 Jul 2026, 13:34 UTC805 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @yashlk_mediaPhoto

25 июля сообщество казанских велосипедистов планирует провести велодевичник в восточной тематике — «Ветер сакуры». Участницы смогут проехать по маршруту в стилизованных образах на украшенных велосипедах. Для всех организуют фотосессию. Парни также могут присоединиться к заезду 😏 Регистрация — по ссылке.

6

24 Jul 2026, 03:24 UTC848 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Существуют места, которые как будто сопротивляются доступной среде от капремонта к капремонту. Логически понять это нельзя, а бороться при отсутствующих механизмах быстрой обратной связи сложно. Нариманова, у вокзала.

6

Signed Jusaꞑ Ju

21 Jul 2026, 10:41 UTC885 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

👆 Вот за это лайк! Развитие и поддержка велосипеда как «транспорта последней мили» до магистрального метро/электрички — это тот самый ключик к созданию велогорода. Теперь ждём велодорожки от МЭТа с физическим разделением от пешеходов. P.S. Нет, воровать велосипеды не будут.

👍13🤣72

21 Jul 2026, 10:38 UTC837 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kazvelPhoto

В Казани на трех станциях метро появились велопарковки На станциях метро «Авиастроительная», «Дубравная» и «Проспект Победы» появились велопарковки. Об этом сообщили в МУП «Метроэлектротранс». Теперь жители города могут доехать до метро на велосипеде, оставить его на специально оборудованной парковке и продолжить поездку на общественном транспорте. Новые велопарковки должны сделать комбинированные поездки по городу

👍17🔥84🤣3💩2

17 Jul 2026, 16:56 UTC≈1,200 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В Казани проложат 11 км новых велодорожек: показываем карту Очень не хотелось душнить и токсить, но я как велосипедист буду скорее против такой концепции велодорожек. *Не считая кольца Казанки — там есть УНИКАЛЬНАЯ возможность сделать хорошо. +это главное место рекреационного катания жителей Казани. Душним по пунктам: 0. Почему не приглашены велосообщества (главное это @kazvel) хотя бы для оценки, комментария, сб

👍19💩11

16 Jul 2026, 13:39 UTC≈1,110 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚇 Екатеринбург: ведёт обсуждение о закупках 11 новых поездов метро Москва (правильная версия от 2019 года) с поставками в 2028-2035 годах... 🚇 Казань: планирует открывать вторую ветку метро, 4 станции в 2027 — 0 новостей о закупках новых составов... 🚇 б/у Русичи из Москвы всё ещё шутка или уже нет?) Подпишись на Казан Урбанчы @kazanurbanche

😢23🤩53💩2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kazanurbanche. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 667,316 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Казан Урбанчы. Про комфортную Казань ❤️” (@kazanurbanche), 1,848 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kazanurbanche.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.