Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Подслушано электрички Москвы

@electrichki

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

63,464subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001393690230
TypeChannel
Username@electrichki
DescriptionСобытия на МЖД и за её пределами По рекламе и остальным вопросам: @MironovZbc Ваш контент @Electrichkalive_bot РКН №5220516434 ВК: https://vk.com/elektrichki_moskva За материалы от подписчиков канал ответственности не несет 18+
Created13 August 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/electrichki

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

63,45363,48663,469.56 August 2026 — 63,474 subscribers6 August 2026 — 63,486 subscribers7 August 2026 — 63,481 subscribers8 August 2026 — 63,482 subscribers9 August 2026 — 63,462 subscribers10 August 2026 — 63,453 subscribers11 August 2026 — 63,464 subscribers63,4646 August 202611 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63,448–63,491 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 16:1263,464+11
10 Aug 2026, 14:2263,453-9
9 Aug 2026, 15:2263,462-20
8 Aug 2026, 12:0863,482+1
7 Aug 2026, 14:1463,481-5
6 Aug 2026, 15:4063,486+12
6 Aug 2026, 03:0263,474first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.3%
avg views ÷ 63,464 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,200
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.823%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held27 (1 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total329,980
Reactions total2,716
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6,740
Videos
3,430
Links
5,430

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
19s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,635 reactions across 26 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
80030.4%
💊35213.4%
😢1575.96%
🤣1515.73%
🔥1465.54%
😱1355.12%
😨1304.93%
👍1154.36%
😁1043.95%
❤‍🔥1023.87%
🎉762.88%
🕊752.85%
😡602.28%
👏411.56%
😭361.37%
🤔351.33%
250.949%
🤯250.949%
🍌90.342%
🤪90.342%
18 further kinds521.97%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,716reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC≈3,360 views72 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @podslushano_elkiPhoto

😕В Твери показали новую «Иволгу 5.0». Поезд осмотрел мэр Москвы Сергей Собянин. Составы создают для межрегиональных маршрутов ЦТУ. 👍Масштабы обновления парка впечатляют: 🔘Уже сейчас: Около 130 «Иволг» ежедневно перевозят пассажиров в столичном регионе. 🔘До 2026 года: Общий парк московских заказов достигнет 496 современных электропоездов (включая линии МЦК, МЦД и Ярославское направление). 🔘До 2030 года: В планах прио

❤‍🔥45💊157👍4🍌1

12 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC≈9,340 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❗️Павелецкое направление. Платформа Варшавская по предварительной информации неисправность электропоезда ЭД4М - 0296. На Павелецком направлении на станции варшавская сегодня утром сломался старый фонд, электрички перенаправили на другой путь. Там что то с электричкой, помощник и машинист бегали, и кричали что нет тока Все просидели в ней 40 минут, увидели что на другой путь приезжают поезда и пошли туда - сообщае

41😢10😭6🤪2👍1💊1

11 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC≈11,600 views154 reactionsread 12 August 2026

😕«Иволга» долетела до Тулы! Современный электропоезд впервые прошёл тестовый маршрут Москва — Тула без пассажиров. Состав преодолел более 300 км, чтобы проверить работу всех систем на максимальных скоростях перед полноценным запуском. ⚡️Главная цель проекта Центрального транспортного узла (ЦТУ) по поручению Мэра Москвы Сергея Собянина — сделать поездки за город такими же комфортными, как на МЦД. Подслушано электри

94👍23💊12🎉8🤔8😡8🌚1

11 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC≈9,810 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026

❗️Ярославское направление. В Болшево (по направлению в область) пассажиру стало плохо, в итоге нас всех высадили на монинскую. -сообщает подписчик В электропоезде Иволга - 073 сообщением Москва Ярославская - Фрязево (6472) пассажиру в вагоне 08 стало плохо. На данный момент ожидают скорую помощь на 2 пути станции Болшево. Задержек не ожидается, поезда пропускают по 4 пути. UPD: Сотрудники скорой медицинской помощи

😱42👍83👏2

11 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈9,830 views186 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Владимир Путин отметил вклад МЦД в улучшение обслуживания жителей столицы и области. 😊 Владимир Путин высоко оценил роль Московских центральных диаметров (МЦД) в улучшении транспортного обслуживания жителей столицы и области. Об этом он заявил на заседании президиума Госсовета по развитию общественного транспорта, которое прошло в режиме видео-конференц-связи. Четыре центральных диаметра связали столицу и Подмосков

💊138👍18😡9🤪6🤔53🎉3🤝2

11 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC≈11,300 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🟠🟠🟠🟠🟠 С 14 августа 2026 года временно изменится расписание движения пригородных поездов на Горьковском и Киевском направлениях. Из-за масштабных работ на станции «Серп и Молот». 😕 Технологические «окна» назначены с 12:10 14 августа до 03:40 17 августа, а также в те же часы 28-31 августа. ➡️На период работ движение поездов на участке Марьина Роща – Нижегородская будет организовано по одному пути в обе стороны. ➡️В с

💊30🍌52🍓1

11 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC≈8,810 views84 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

А вы знали что у каждого района Москвы есть свой характер? На одном из вокзалов Москвы заметили постер «Карта характеров Москвы». Интересная концепция. Из какого района вы? Подслушано электрички Москвы 😆Найдено электрички Москвы 🇷🇺 ПЭМ в MAX 🇷🇺 Электрички Live 💙 ПЭМ в ВК 😌Предложить свою новость

💊6410🤔4🤗2🤨2👾1💔1

11 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC≈8,770 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @velectrichke

🩰Утерян белый пакет с балетной пачкой в электричке ярославского направления сообщением Москва-Ярославская - Сергиев Посад. Ищу свидетелей / Потерялась вещь! Вчера (10.08) в электричке «Москва — Сергиев Посад» был утерян белый пакет, внутри которого находилась балетная пачка. Села в поезд в 19:25 на станции Ростокино, вышла на Мамонтовской. Пакет остался на верхней полке. На конечной станции в Сергиевом Посаде сотруд

255🤷‍♀4

11 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC≈8,640 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026

❤️‍🔥Видели что-то интересное на железной дороге? Необычную ситуацию, опоздание или просто красивый кадр? 📸Присылайте фото и видео нам в редакцию! Самые интересные материалы опубликуем. ❗️Помните о личной безопасности: не стойте на путях ради удачного ракурса. ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️

💊2610👍3🤪1🙊1

11 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC≈9,490 views120 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

☀️ Утро на станции Зеленоград-Крюково. Всем хорошего и продуктивного дня. Подслушано электрички Москвы 😆Найдено электрички Москвы 🇷🇺 ПЭМ в MAX 🇷🇺 Электрички Live 💙 ПЭМ в ВК 😌Предложить свою новость

🔥7630💊8🕊3🤷‍♂2👍1

9 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC≈11,500 views126 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚆 «Подслушано электрички Москвы» открывает набор редакторов в команду! Если вы интересуетесь железнодорожной тематикой, следите за новостями транспорта и хотите стать частью одного из крупнейших тематических медиа, мы будем рады видеть вас в нашей команде! Мы ищем человека, который: ✅ старше 18 лет; ✅ хорошо ориентируется в сфере железнодорожного транспорта (МЖД, ЦППК, МТППК, МЦД, пригородное сообщение); ✅ умеет г

🤣80💊19🥰75🙊5🔥4👍3🤔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @electrichki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@electrichki edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 26,236 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Дептранс Москвы
@DtRoad · 150,822
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Иволга (электропоезд) (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…zhukvesti.ru/articles/detail/61735/ |url-status=live }}[https://t.me/electrichki/5986?single Telegram: Contact @electrichki<!-- Заголовок добавлен…”
read 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Подслушано электрички Москвы” (@electrichki), 63,464 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/electrichki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.