Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مجمع پریشانی

Channel

مجمع پریشانی

@majmaeparishani

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,038subscribers

+147 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001053143755
TypeChannel
Username@majmaeparishani
Created10 May 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/majmaeparishani

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,8914,0383,964.56 August 2026 — 3,891 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,891 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,892 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,897 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,924 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,938 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,947 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,951 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,954 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,963 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,971 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,976 subscribers12 September 2026 — 4,014 subscribers15 September 2026 — 4,029 subscribers19 September 2026 — 4,038 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 45 days, net +147. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,869–4,060 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 16:194,038+9
15 Sept 2026, 15:204,029+15
12 Sept 2026, 00:414,014+38
7 Sept 2026, 13:183,976+5
2 Sept 2026, 23:383,971+8
27 Aug 2026, 16:533,963+9
25 Aug 2026, 00:293,954+3
21 Aug 2026, 19:383,951+4
18 Aug 2026, 22:153,947+9
16 Aug 2026, 06:123,938+14
12 Aug 2026, 15:583,924+27
9 Aug 2026, 08:323,897+5
6 Aug 2026, 19:003,892+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:213,891no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:043,891first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 21 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 13s
Average length
1m 44s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

507 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
26652.5%
🤣11622.9%
👌458.88%
😁356.90%
👍295.72%
👎91.78%
😢50.986%
👏20.394%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 518 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC755 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

کی از چه کتابی خوشش می‌آد؟ (دکتر احمدرضا بهرام‌پور عمران) اسرافیل: سمفونیِ مردگان مدّاح: مصیبت‌نامه مولوی: حمامِ روح چریک: من هم چه‌گوارا هستم خرسِ قطبی: خوابِ زمستانی شکارچی: شوهرِ آهوخانم فمینیست: زنان بدونِ مردان مؤمنِ شکمو: فرشته با بوی پرتقال حیوان‌آزار: سگِ ولگرد عیّاش محتاط: تفریحاتِ سالم کلیمی: سفر به ولایتِ عزرائیل افلاطون: فرار از فلسفه شیفتگانِ ساعدی: عموغلام خودشیفته: باغِ آینه فرزندمرده: سنگی بر گوری پ

10😁5👌3

Signed سهیل یاری

5 Aug 2026, 22:42 UTC647 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

از اشعار سحرآمیز استاد طوفان https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAD7Fssu7AgJ7o97tgw

🤣12

Signed سهیل یاری

3 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC980 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

سوگندهای عجیب خاقانی به ریشِ تیس و به بینیِ پیل و غَبغَبِ گاو به خرسِ رقص‌کن و بوزنینهٔ لَعّاب به سامِ اَبرَص و حِربا و خَنفَسا و جُعَل به جیفه‌گاه و به ناووس و مستراح و خَلاب... ز من حکیمی سوگندنامه‌ای درخواست به نام شاه جهان، قبلهٔ اُولوالألباب ازین قصیده که گفتم، سخنورانِ جهان به حیرت‌اند چو از منطق طُیور، غُراب (دیوان خاقانی، ویراست کزّازی، ج ۱، ص ۸۳-۸۵) https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAD7Fssu7AgJ7o97tgw

11🤣10😁4👍1

Signed سهیل یاری

3 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC952 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

هنرنمایی خاقانی هشت خُلد و هفت چرخ و شش جهات و پنج حِس چار ارکان و سه ارواح و دو کَون، از یک خدا (دیوان خاقانی، ویراست کزّازی، ج ۱، ص ۹) https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAD7Fssu7AgJ7o97tgw

17👍2👌1

Signed سهیل یاری

24 Jul 2026, 06:19 UTC≈2,720 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

بلاگرهایی که فاز کتاب‌خوانی برمی‌دارند! https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAD7Fssu7AgJ7o97tgw

🤣45👌21😁1

Signed سهیل یاری

23 Jul 2026, 18:56 UTC≈3,240 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026

امشب یادداشتی دیدم که بخشی از آن چنین بود: «برخلاف زبان‌های دیگر، در زبان فارسی اگر جایی تأکید بر جنسیت باشد اولویت با زنان است. بر خلاف زبان‌های لاتین و اروپایی که می‌گویند (HUSBAND AND WIFE)، ما می‌گوییم زن و شوهر همچنین به جای (BROTHER AND SISTER)، ما می‌گوییم خواهر و برادر، و به جای (MEN AND WOMEN)، ما می‌گوییم زن و مرد... . اگر جایی لازم شده زنان را در اولویت قرار داده‌ایم، حتی در زبان فارسی «زن» یک واژه و مفهوم

20👍14👌6👎3

Signed سهیل یاری

23 Jul 2026, 07:36 UTC≈2,230 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026

تیز در ریش ثنا گفتیم ما مر خواجه‌ای را که نشناسد مُقَفّا از مُرَدَّف عطارد در اسد بادش همیشه یکی مقلوب و آن دیگر مُصَحَّف (سنایی، دیوان، چاپ مَظاهر مصفّا، ص ۷۱۰) نام فارسی عطارد، «تیر» است و مصحّف آن، «تیز». اسد نیز به فارسی، «شیر» می‌شود و مقلوب آن، «ریش». https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAD7Fssu7AgJ7o97tgw

🤣238👌1😁1

Signed سهیل یاری

22 Jul 2026, 12:52 UTC≈2,190 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

در این چاپی که از دیوان انوری، تصحیح استاد مدرّس رضوی، دارم، روی جلد، «به اهتمام»، در صفحهٔ ۳، «به کوشش» و در صفحهٔ ۴، «مترجم» (؟!) آمده‌است! https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAD7Fssu7AgJ7o97tgw

😁23🤣72

Signed سهیل یاری

18 Jul 2026, 15:47 UTC≈2,080 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

احترام گذاشتن به نظر می‌آید که در این ترکیب، فعل گذاشتن (با حرف «ذ») غلط باشد و صحیح آن، گزاردن (با حرف «ز») است؛ یعنی «به جا آوردن»... . باید دانست که ترکیب احترام گذاشتن (یا گزاردن) در متون قدیم پیش از قرن دهم و حتی یازدهم اصلاً به کار نرفته‌است (برای بیان این معنی، حرمت داشتن می‌گفته‌اند) و این ترکیب فقط در قرون متأخّر ساخته و رایج شده‌است. می‌توان حدس زد که در عهد صفویه و قاجاریه که تمایز معنایی و املایی دو ف

18

Signed سهیل یاری

17 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC≈1,660 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

دلم شکسته‌تر از شیشه‌های شهر شماست شکسته باد کسی کاین چنین‌مان می‌خواست شما چقدر صبور و چقدر خشم‌آگین حضورتان چو تلاقی صخره با دریاست به استواری معنای تازه بخشیدید شما نه مِثل دماوند، او به مِثل شماست بیا که از همهٔ دشت‌ها سؤال کنیم کدام قلّه چنین سرفراز و پابرجاست؟ میان معرکه لبخند می‌زنید به عشق حماسه چون به غزل ختم می‌شود زیباست اگرچه باغچه‌ها را کسی لگد کرده ولی بهار فقط در تصرّف گل‌هاست تخلّص غزلم چیست غیر

28

Signed سهیل یاری

16 Jul 2026, 22:38 UTC≈1,830 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

نقد حال توانگر و بینوا مَردِ مُقِل‌حال را به وقتِ گفتار اگر خود دُر چکاند، بسیارگوی شمرند و فضیلت و رذیلت او را یکی دانند. اگر وقتی مروّتی به کار دارد، باددستش خوانند و اگر امتناعی نماید، بخیلش گویند. اگر مراعاتی نماید، سپاس ندارند. اگر مُواساتی کند مقبول نیاید. اگر حلیم بود، به بددلی منسوب شود. اگر تجاسُری کند، به دیوانگی موسوم گردد. و باز برعکسِ این حال، مردِ توانگر را چون اندک‌هنری بوَد، آن را بزرگ دانند و اگر ا

👌1715

Signed سهیل یاری

10 Jul 2026, 13:36 UTC≈2,430 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

فَربهی و زیباییِ زن (سهیل یاری) معیارهای زیبایی¹ از دیرباز در میان اقوام و فرهنگ‌ها متفاوت بوده و با گذر زمان نیز این ملاک‌های جمال‌شناختی دگرگون شده و «قُدَمای ما در جمال‌شناسیِ خود معیارهایی داشته‌اند که ممکن است لزوماً با آنچه در عصر ما مصداق زیبایی انگاشته می‌شود سازگار نباشد» (حمیدیان، ۱۳۹۱: ج ۲/ ۹۱۸). بنابر شواهد ذیل، یکی از مَظاهرِ زیبایی زن در نگاه گذشتگان عرب، «چاقی» او بوده است: - قال ابنُ سِيرين: ... لا

16👌5👍1

Signed سهیل یاری

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @majmaeparishani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

شفیعی کدکنی
@shafiei_kadkani · 44,420
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
مخزن کتاب های pdf ادبی
@pdf_kotob_e_adabi · 23,868
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 17 September 2026
مولوی و عرفان
@MolaviPoet · 28,878
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مجمع پریشانی” (@majmaeparishani), 4,038 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/majmaeparishani.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.