Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for JuIci NFT |💊|

Channel

JuIci NFT |💊|

@juici_nft

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

453subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002897838237
TypeChannel
Username@juici_nft
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 24 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/juici_nft

Growth

453454453.513 Aug 2026, 21:34 — 454 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 01:59 — 453 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 21:3415 Aug 2026, 01:59
2 measurements spanning 1 day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 453–454 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:59453-1
13 Aug 2026, 21:34454first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2025, 08:40 UTC137 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

💭 Lucha уходит? Один из топовых коллекционеров подарков Lucha, написал, сколько, по его мнению, они должны стоить. Если в течение месяца цена не достигнет этой отметки, он пообещал прекратить активность на рынке. 🎁 Plush Pepe должны стоить 10 000–15 000 TON минимум; 🎁 Durov’s Cap — 1000–1500 TON; 🎁 Heart Locket — 2500–3000 TON. Также он предложил свои идеи о том, как Telegram мог бы грамотнее продавать подарки и п

1 Sept 2025, 17:21 UTC115 viewsread 13 August 2026

Не забывайте где самые дешевые звезды + бот сейчас функционирует без перебоев

1 Sept 2025, 17:19 UTC87 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎁 Лимит покупки подарков на аккаунт: 🎁Книга - 4шт 🎁Портфель - 5шт ⏰Мин. лимит на покупку - 0ч ⏰Маx. лимит на покупку - 6ч Также, новые подарки нельзя дарить на канал!

1 Sept 2025, 04:47 UTC67 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎁 ВРЕМЯ ДО НОВЫХ УЛУЧШЕНИЙ! Время до того как улучшения на кнопку станут минимальными по стоимости! Future upgrade prices: 20000 ⭐️ ➜ 03:22 15000 ⭐️ ➜ 04:22 10000 ⭐️ ➜ 05:22 7500 ⭐️ ➜ 06:22 5000 ⭐️ ➜ 07:22 2500 ⭐️ ➜ 08:22 2000 ⭐️ ➜ 09:22 1500 ⭐️ ➜ 10:22 1000 ⭐️ ➜ 11:22 750 ⭐️ ➜ 12:22 500 ⭐️ ➜ 13:22 250 ⭐️ ➜ 14:22 200 ⭐️ ➜ 15:22 150 ⭐️ ➜ 16:22 100 ⭐️ ➜ 17:22 75 ⭐️ ➜ 18:22 50 ⭐️ ➜ 19:22 25 ⭐️ ➜ 20:22

1 Sept 2025, 03:44 UTC50 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Кто не может купить новые подарки, из за того что нет 10 лет аккаунту - могу помочь в приобретении подарков. Подарю со своего за небольшую плату. По вопросам @YaJuici

31 Aug 2025, 18:52 UTC49 viewsread 13 August 2026

Выход новых подарков ждём с 23:00 до 03:00 время более подходящим не придумаешь Самое время купить звёзды Заходи в @EasyStarsssbot и покупай

30 Aug 2025, 17:00 UTC49 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎁Готовимся к 1 сентября и запасамся звездами заранее! Закупаем звёзды в @EasyStarsssbot : 100⭐️ - 120 рублей! (Самая дешевая цена на рынке) Перед дропом сервера Fragment часто перегружены, и вы можете не успеть забрать подарки. Покупайте звёзды прямо сейчас и будьте готовы! 🎁Какие подарки ждем?

30 Aug 2025, 11:42 UTC63 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

📊 Обновление рынка подарков за последние 24 часа❗️ 🛒Сегодня на рынке ситуация неплохая, большинство подарков в плюсе ↗️ 🔼ТОП-3 плюсе: 🎁Jelly Bunny +10.03% 🎩Witch Hat +7.62% 🎁Berry Box +5.42% 🔽ТОП-3 минусе: 🔮Crystal Ball -7.32% 🎁Genie Lamp -7.27% 🎂Homemade Cake -5.41% 👀 Следим за изменениями дальше. Что думаете❓ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ⭐️ Самые дешевые звезды 1,20₽ 🦠 Вирус - ежедневный фриспин 😚 ROLLS - гарант бесплатный подаро

30 Aug 2025, 07:45 UTC46 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎁 ЗОЛОТАЯ КОЛЛЕКЦИЯ! Сегодня продали золотую коллекцию, всего за 950 TON (2 900$)! Как то дешево даже… ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ⭐️ Самые дешевые звезды 1,20₽ 🦠 Вирус - ежедневный фриспин 😚 ROLLS - гарант бесплатный подарок 🛍 Реклама и сотрудничество

29 Aug 2025, 11:10 UTC39 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

2 дня до долгожданного выхода новых подарков Вы уже зарядили котлету звёзд через @EasyStarsssbot ? ⭐️ Звезды по 1,2₽, дешевле не найдете

28 Aug 2025, 10:49 UTC54 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Создатель лабубу обогнал Дурова в списке Forbes всего за пол года 😁 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ⭐️ Самые дешевые звезды 1,20₽ 🦠 Вирус - ежедневный фриспин 😚 ROLLS - гарант бесплатный подарок 🛍 Реклама и сотрудничество

28 Aug 2025, 06:40 UTC45 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

Не обычный профиль неулучшенных и дорогих подарков 🎁 3 Plush Pepe 🎁 114 Iron Gem 🎁 30 Durov Cap 🎁 12 Brick 🎁 36 Nail Bracelet 🎁 45 Sharp Tongue 🎁 48 Trapped Heart 🎁 51 Skull flower Выглядит красиво, может он забыл где покупать звёзды для улучшения. Ссылку на покупку ниже оставлю 😂 🔗Купить звёзды @EasyStarsssBot

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @juici_nft. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,472,300 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“JuIci NFT |💊|” (@juici_nft), 453 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/juici_nft.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.