Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Катя Тюхай о дизайне

Channel

Катя Тюхай о дизайне

@lifeislifedesign

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

134subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001279084855
TypeChannel
Username@lifeislifedesign
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/lifeislifedesign

Growth

1346 August 2026 — 134 subscribers9 August 2026 — 134 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 133–135 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 00:15134no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:32134first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
127
Videos
32
Links
84

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 02s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2050.0%
1230.0%
😁512.5%
🥰37.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 October 2025 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.26%
1 of 19 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
63.0
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
90.0
over 18 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjeWsKHd19 July 20269 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 October 2025 to 9 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

9 Jul 2026, 14:47 UTC62 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @mnogovakansiy

Промокод KAIF30 —30%

9 Jul 2026, 14:47 UTC63 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjeWsKHdForwarded from @senior_designer_pragmaticaVideo

ЧТО ПО СПИКЕРАМ И ОПЕН МАЙКУ НА КАЙФЕ? СОХРАНЯЕМ И ПЛАНИРУЕМ ⚪️ ⚪️ кайфовать от хедлайнеров 🤍 женя яровой из Pragmatica поделится, как расти в профессии, когда все не очень, 🤍 маша троицкая из Т-Банка раскидает, как и зачем отсвечивать в проф-сообществе, 🤍 катя тюхай из Атома и Британки зарядит про дизайн по любви, а 🤍 сеня попов из Colombo Effect выдаст про гробы для кошек и другие способы стать собой. ⚪️ слу

3

29 Jun 2026, 10:52 UTC81 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Всем привет! Выступаю на "Кайференции" 19 июля, в прошлом году было отлично, открытая веранда, плотные выступления в стиле Ted Talks и вайб загородного фестиваля! Будет открытый микрофон, дизайн‑батл от Авито, спикеры из Т-Банка, Атома, Прагматики, гости из МТС, Флаувау, Сбера, Альфа-Банка, DuoSapiens, вечеринка с диджеями и сотни причин для нетворкинга. Осталось 200 билетов по текущей цене > kaifconf.ru

🔥2

27 Jun 2026, 05:56 UTC85 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ejdailyru

В Британии свернули ИИ-систему для прогнозирования преступлений после провала алгоритмов. Подробности: Британская полиция и местные власти отказались от ключевых моделей системы, которая должна была прогнозировать преступления и выявлять уязвимых граждан, пишет WIRED. Один из алгоритмов для прогнозирования грабежей более трех лет показывал точность ниже 10%, а данные оказались настолько ненадежными, что социальные ра

26 Jun 2026, 07:26 UTC89 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @realbeingamericanPhoto

Телепатия от Neuralink может появиться уже в этом году? Илон Маск обмолвился, что уже в скором времени люди смогут передавать мысли от своего мозга к другому без речи, сообщений и жестов. В соцсети Х инженер Tesla написал: «Взаимодействие между людьми часто ограничено не вычислительными возможностями, а пропускной способностью. Поэтому следующим эволюционным шагом станет прямая коммуникация в латентном пространстве,

23 Jun 2026, 12:53 UTC78 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @smartdariaFile

сегодня утром принимала душ под karma police — radiohead. это было драматично. 🤌 магия музыки в том, что звуковые волны способна вызвать в нас очень разные чувства. да, на это способны и другие выразительные искусства (живопись, литература), но музыка, конечно, — самое доступное средство. серьёзно, ну разве у вас в душе не разрывается что-то, когда слушаете эту нетленку от radiohead? если нет — поздравляю, у вас, в

2

29 May 2026, 09:03 UTC91 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Так, ладно, все уже обсудили, ну а я чем хуже😁

😁3

23 May 2026, 10:11 UTC95 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @mnogovakansiyPhoto

Всем привет, это админ! В качестве контента выходного дня - мое интервью с Аней Каминской про то, как сохранить аутентичность в работе и жизни в эпоху ИИ. Мы, конечно, не Дудь с Косенко, но местами было полезно и где-то даже весело(хотя иногда во время интервью хотелось посоветовать зрителям и себе купить землю, разбить огород и уехать к чертовой матери😁😁😁🌱) Hugs! https://youtu.be/9xWgUmqW9yU?is=xyv_03Bi3fW-Gx0s

🔥6

20 Apr 2026, 10:41 UTC94 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @mnogovakansiyPhoto

Всем привет, это админ! Придумали в БВШД бесплатную онлайн-конференцию, залетайте 25 апреля🤍 🔶 Дизайн конф: что происходит с UX/UI 25 апреля 13:00-19:00 — веб-конференция про то, как сегодня устроен продуктовый дизайн 🐶 UX/UI уже не про кнопки и сетки в Figma, а про поведение, решения и опыт пользователей. Обсудим, какие тренды задают Азия и Восток, как ИИ перепрошивает команды и почему без исследований не запус

13 Apr 2026, 14:16 UTC90 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Anthropic подтвердила внутренний запуск новой модели Claude Mythos с фокусом на кибербезопасности. Mythos смогла найти тысячи серьёзных багов в различных системах, которые были предоставлены ей для проверки, включая старые дыры в инфраструктурном софте и цепочки уязвимостей в ядре Linux, показывая уровень, сопоставимый с топ‑экспертами. В System Card описан эпизод: раннюю версию Mythos посадили в «песочницу» и пору

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @lifeislifedesign. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,109,490 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Катя Тюхай о дизайне” (@lifeislifedesign), 134 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lifeislifedesign.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.