Channel
@usa_designer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,679subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001605388592 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @usa_designer |
| Created | 11 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/usa_designer |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 1,679 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 1,680 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 1,680 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 6 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
221 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 86 | 38.9% | |
| 😁 | 62 | 28.1% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 12.7% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 6.33% | |
| 😱 | 12 | 5.43% | |
| 🤬 | 8 | 3.62% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 1.81% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.36% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 0.905% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 0.905% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 21 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @usa_designer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 April 2026 to 21 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 21 April 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
топ-3 сложных вещей в жизни любого человека: - быть ответственным - быть честным с собой - после офиса Меты с бесконечной едой и красивыми видами на Нью-Йорк возвращаться в свой маленький офис стартапа, и все равно выбирать его…
😁31🔥15❤1
Тем временем Декстера снимают рядом с моей работой. Хорошо, что реальные локации. А то вот для нового Spider Man обставляют улицу как в Нью-Йорке, но в ШОТЛАНДИИ.
🔥15❤5👍3😱2
Попробовал новый дизайн инструммент от Claude 1. Загружаешь дизайн-систему: можно подключить Github, загрузить Figma, написать немного про бренд. Дальше, он 10 минут изучает эти файлы. 2. Даешь задачу, и он, как дизайнер, расспрашивает тебя про детали в формате опроса с вариантами ответа. 3. Клод выдает дизайны, с возможностью менять варианты одним кликом. Заменит ли человека+фигму? Сомневаюсь. Результат выглядит…
🔥18😍4💯3
AIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAI
😁31🔥4💊2❤1
Канадская студия Metalab показала новый кейс для Robinhood Добавили больше динамики и 3D в интерфейсы. Смешно, но почти всё портфолио держу у них... только потому что там КРАСИВО. metalab.com/work/robinhood
🔥26😱4🦄2
Я открыл свою LLC еще в 2020. Процесс регистрации компании был не самым тривиальным: я не был налоговым резидентом, у меня не было почтового адреса (в США до сих пор шлют письма), и было много неочевидных действий, которые нужно было сделать во время и после регистрации компании. После 2022 стало еще сложнее. У многих проблемы возникают после регистрации: подключение Stripe/Paypal, блокировки и вывод денег. Многие с…
🤬8👍7❤4🔥4
Интересные движения на рынке айти в США: · PM вакансий максимум за 3 года. · Разработчики по прежнему в сильном спросе, AI не снизил. · Рынок у дизайнеров стагнирует, вакансий меньше чем PM (1,2x). · Bay Area снова встает на ноги: 20% вакансий в США это Bay Area. · Удалёнки стало меньше (-20%). · Несмотря на лейоффы, рынок в целом растёт. Полгода назад когда выходил на текущую работу, мне предложили взять на себя п…
👍18😱6🔥4❤3
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @usa_designer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 545,593 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Даня в США” (@usa_designer), 1,679 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/usa_designer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.