Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Косметика lifecode

Channel

Косметика lifecode

@lifecodecosmetic

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21,080subscribers

-121 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001567463395
TypeChannel
Username@lifecodecosmetic
DescriptionВся правда про косметику и уход за кожей!🔝 Косметика lifecode - это: 💫Видимый эффект с первого применения 🔥 Действующий % полезных веществ в составе, а не очередная бесполезная баночка в косметичке ✅ ЗАКАЗАТЬ 👇 Золотое Яблоко, Л’Этуаль, OZON, WB
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lifecodecosmetic

Growth

21,08021,20121,140.57 August 2026 — 21,201 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,201 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,194 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,184 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,164 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,160 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,142 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,128 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,123 subscribers15 August 2026 — 21,080 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net -121. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,062–21,219 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 05:5521,080-43
14 Aug 2026, 01:0821,123-5
12 Aug 2026, 22:5521,128-14
11 Aug 2026, 20:3121,142-18
10 Aug 2026, 18:3121,160-4
9 Aug 2026, 17:4121,164-20
8 Aug 2026, 14:0121,184-10
7 Aug 2026, 16:5321,194-7
7 Aug 2026, 13:4521,201no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:3321,201first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.35%
avg views ÷ 21,080 subscribers
Avg views / post
285
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held35 (24 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total9,390
Reactions total1,032
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,880
Videos
1,230
Links
1,510

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,032 reactions across 33 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
67465.3%
👍12111.7%
🔥1029.88%
👏272.62%
❤‍🔥252.42%
🤔201.94%
😭181.74%
🥰121.16%
😍100.969%
🤩100.969%
🎉40.388%
🤡40.388%
👀30.291%
😁20.194%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,032reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 33 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lifecodecosmetic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC66 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Топ 5 книг о гармонии с собой и умении быть счастливым👍🏻 📚 «Большая книга о счастье», редакция Лео Борманса Творение ста экспертов в области позитивной психологии. Они десятилетиями изучали счастье как науку и выявили его секреты, доказанные статистически. 📚 «Эссенциализм. Путь к простоте», Грег МакКеон О подходе, который научит вас фокусироваться на главном и не тратить время и энергию на ненужное. 📚«Книга радост

🔥64👍2

15 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC62 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4👍4🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTC126 views25 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Как правильно пользоваться SPF каждый день Солнцезащита — самый эффективный шаг в уходе за кожей, но именно его чаще всего используют неправильно. Разбираемся, зачем нужен SPF каждый день, сколько наносить и как встроить его в рутину без лишних сложностей в нашем блоге

25

14 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC127 views18 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

18

13 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC151 views24 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Домашние бьюти-гаджеты и косметика — как усилить уход Домашние бьюти-гаджеты — заметный тренд последних лет: роллеры, гуаша, массажёры, приборы для очищения. Но работают они только в связке с грамотно подобранной косметикой. Разбираемся, как сочетать устройства и средства, чтобы усилить результат. Зачем нужны бьюти-гаджеты Если хотите узнать подробнее читайте в нашем блоге

22👏2

13 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC141 views11 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Бьюти-находки, которые действительно стоит попробовать. *️⃣Во-первых, вот такой вот массажер, с которым классно с утра делать себе массаж, чтобы убрать отеки. *️⃣Во-вторых, вот такая мультифункциональная спрей-сыворотка. Это уже моя не первая баночка. В составе есть коллаген, который дает эффект молодости. Его можно наносить как перед макияжем в качестве подготовки, так же ее удобно взять с собой, у нее такое мягко

8👍3

13 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC121 views14 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

11🥰3

12 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC169 views29 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @victoriiiiiiiiiiPhoto

Сегодня выложила во ВКонтакте видео про вот эти вот баночки, которые заменят походы к косметологу и сэкономят точно вам много денег на разных процедурах Это два продукта от бренда lifecode. Я про него вам рассказывала множество раз И эти две баночки направлены на разглаживание кожи, устранение следов усталости, постакне, мелких морщин и наполнение кожи изнутри И в комбо они визуально разглаживают кожу, как будто б

👍1514

11 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC247 views30 reactionsread 15 August 2026

😁😆😁 Девочки, сегодня хочу поделиться с вами, какой домик я нашла для всех своих баночек. Просто оцените этот размер, в нее влезают просто все мои любимые продукты, и даже еще кучу места остается. Я просто в восторге, как красиво она смотрится в интерьере. Остается чистой, так как ее удобно стирать в машинке. Заказать можно на сайте lifecode.pro

30

11 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC232 views16 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

16

10 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC283 views25 reactionsread 15 August 2026

А МЫ НАПОМИНАЕМ, ЧТО У НАС ПРОХОДЯТ КОЛЛАБОРАЦИИ подробнее в закрепленных сообщениях

22👀3

10 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC285 views24 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Как формировать привычки. Есть много важных и полезных привычек, на которые требуется не больше пяти минут в день, а чтобы заметно изменить жизнь к лучшему. Главное — регулярность. ✔️Соотнесите привычки с целями. Это позволит найти мотивацию. ✔️Придумайте вознаграждение. За внедрение новой привычки. ✔️Определите триггер привычки. Он запустит все последующие действия. ✔️Привяжите привычку к обычному действию. И в

20🤔4

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @lifecodecosmetic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 148,486 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Косметика lifecode” (@lifecodecosmetic), 21,080 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lifecodecosmetic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.