Channel
@nameskincare
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
5,962subscribers
-280 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001661996871 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nameskincare |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nameskincare |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 5,962 | -43 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 6,005 | -218 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 6,223 | -19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 6,242 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (30 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,442 |
| Reactions total | 538 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
538 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 217 | 40.3% | |
| 👍 | 107 | 19.9% | |
| 🥰 | 104 | 19.3% | |
| 🐳 | 53 | 9.85% | |
| 🍓 | 36 | 6.69% | |
| 🤔 | 13 | 2.42% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 0.558% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 0.558% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.372% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 538reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«Главный артефакт нулевых» 🪩 А что из нулевых до сих пор живёт у вас дома? Неважно, что это: 💿 коллекция старых дисков 📱 первый телефон 🧸 игрушка из детства 📸 фотоальбом 🤍 любимая вещь или какой-нибудь совершенно необъяснимый предмет, который вы почему-то не выбросили за 20 лет. Кидайте фото в комментарии — устроим маленький музей нулевых прямо здесь! И обязательно напишите, что это и почему вы до сих пор его хр…
❤11🥰9🐳6😁2
Отметьте то, что уже делаете автоматически
The shares total 232%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤8👍7🐳3🤔3
Кажется, мист давно перестал быть средством «только для жары». Есть несколько моментов, когда он действительно оказывается кстати: ▫️ Когда несколько часов провели за компьютером Воздух в офисах и дома часто суше, чем кажется, и коже тоже хочется немного комфорта. ▫️ После долгой дороги Самолет, поезд, машина – после нескольких часов в пути кожа редко выглядит такой же свежей, как до поездки. ▫️ Перед важной встре…
❤14🥰9🐳8👍3
Кажется, наши глаза заслужили небольшой отдых, после постоянного скроллинга 🌟Поэтому в NSC появилась самонагревающаяся успокаивающая маска для глаз! При контакте с воздухом она начинает мягко нагреваться, создавая комфортное тепло примерно на 30 минут. Оно помогает снять чувство усталости, расслабить область вокруг глаз и настроиться на полноценный отдых. Маска не содержит отдушек, поэтому ничего не отвлекает – то…
👍11🥰11❤10🐳1
Если бы ингредиенты могли знакомиться, гиалуроновая кислота и ниацинамид точно не были бы соперниками😏 В карточках собрали мини-шпаргалку, которая поможет быстро разобраться, в каких случаях выбирать каждый из них. 📎 Какой ингредиент разобрать следующим? Пишите в комментариях – будем делать больше таких шпаргалок!
❤13🥰10👍9
🌟 Собрали для вас готовые наборы ухода – до 3000₽ и до 5000₽ Осталось только выбрать тот, который подойдет именно вам! А еще напоминаем: на официальном сайте VDKSHOP действует бесплатная доставка при заказе от 3000₽. Самое время пополнить косметичку 😉
❤16👍11🍓6💔3🐳2
За что мы на самом деле платим, когда покупаем косметику? 📎 Можно подумать, что если крем стоит в три раза дороже, то и работать он будет в три раза лучше. Но в реальности цена складывается не только из состава. На нее влияют: • упаковка и дизайн • рекламные кампании • сотрудничество с блогерами • аренда полок в магазинах • известность бренда • логистика и многое другое При этом один и тот же актив, например, ниац…
❤15👍12🤔3🐳2
Как думаете, что сильнее всего влияет на цену косметики?
The shares total 136%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤11🤔7🐳5
Август на связи! 🌟Ловите подборку летних обоев на телефон В комментариях оставили файлы в хорошем качестве⬇️
❤18🥰10👍5🐳4🍓2
Иногда лучший шаг – остановиться, вернуться к базовому уходу и дать коже немного времени. ▫️Когда мы наносим слишком много средств одновременно, постоянно меняем уход или пытаемся «исправить» кожу любой ценой, ей становится только сложнее. Кожный барьер не всегда успевает адаптироваться, а раздражение легко принять за новую проблему. Сохраняйте карточку – она пригодится в тот момент, когда снова захочется купить «е…
❤13🥰13👍6🐳3
Когда-то нас убедили, что чем сильнее очищает средство, тем лучше. 🌟 Но кожа – это не сковородка после жарки. Ей не нужно скрипеть, чтобы быть чистой! Хорошее очищение – это когда вы смыли макияж, SPF и загрязнения, но при этом коже по-прежнему комфортно. Именно поэтому мы любим мягкие пенки с ухаживающими компонентами – например, с пантенолом. Они очищают, не оставляя ощущения, что теперь лицо срочно нужно «спаса…
❤19👍12🍓9🥰4🐳1
Привет, август! 🌟 Новый месяц – это всегда хороший повод начать что-то новое. В августе будем вместе разбираться: ▫️ почему дорогая косметика – не всегда лучшая ▫️ зачем коже иногда нужно меньше ухода, а не больше ▫️ как восстановить кожу после активного солнца ▫️ чем отличаются самые популярные компоненты и как понять, какой подойдет именно вам И, конечно, никуда не денутся наши любимые рубрики: чек-листы, подбор…
🥰14❤13👍11🍓5🐳1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @nameskincare. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Отметьте то, что уже делаете автоматически
The shares total 232%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как думаете, что сильнее всего влияет на цену косметики?
The shares total 136%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 531,932 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NSC | Name Skin Care” (@nameskincare), 5,962 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nameskincare.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.