Revenir à la source, la matrice originelle, la nature, celle qui nous gouverne. Nous protéger, pour mieux retourner au combat, pour la protéger et la défendre.
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 8 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @lesloisacreesdelanature — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
62 measurements spanning 94 days, net +42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,799–14,046 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 11:47
13,869
+3
7 Nov 2026, 08:46
13,866
-2
6 Nov 2026, 06:48
13,868
-16
5 Nov 2026, 06:20
13,884
-7
4 Nov 2026, 07:27
13,891
-6
3 Nov 2026, 05:39
13,897
-4
2 Nov 2026, 06:49
13,901
+2
1 Nov 2026, 09:50
13,899
-11
31 Oct 2026, 06:54
13,910
-5
30 Oct 2026, 03:16
13,915
+4
29 Oct 2026, 06:47
13,911
+9
28 Oct 2026, 01:31
13,902
+1
27 Oct 2026, 00:11
13,901
-4
26 Oct 2026, 01:38
13,905
-6
24 Oct 2026, 22:15
13,911
-8
23 Oct 2026, 22:05
13,919
-3
22 Oct 2026, 19:47
13,922
-13
21 Oct 2026, 17:17
13,935
-1
20 Oct 2026, 10:50
13,936
-4
19 Oct 2026, 10:17
13,940
first reading
Engagement
227 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.50%
avg views ÷ 13,869 subscribers
Avg views / post
347
110 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
110
of 227 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
227 (4 August 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
38,171
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 07:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,610
Videos
≈1,660
Links
≈5,060
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
7h 35m
Average length
9m 17s
Measured directly from 49 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 110 posts held from the last 30 days (6.36%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Plus loin que soit, plus loin que moi, l'autre.
Une notion de transmission, une notion de pensées à soi.
Penser à soi c'est penser à l'autre.
Quand il n'y a plus rien, il y a tout.
TABAC à ROULER: Pourcentage d’additifs et taux de nicotine, goudrons | Les additifs du tabac et du papier à cigarette
http://additifstabac.free.fr/index.php/tabac-rouler-pourcentage-additifs-taux-nicotine-goudrons/
90 937 détenus pour 63 452 places, 8 959 personnes qui dorment par terre comme des animaux.
On appelle ça la justice, mais c'est juste de l'entassement indigne.
Comment parler de réinsertion quand on dort sur un matelas au sol, sans intimité, sans hygiène ?
On fabrique de la colère, de la violence et de la récidive, pas des citoyens.
Il est urgent de trouver des solutions dignes, pour les détenus comme pour les surve…
J'avais reçu un email :
"Bonsoir à tous !
Un petit message pour vous rappeler que notre Concert du mois a lieu samedi 24 octobre à 21h.
Venez nombreux découvrir le duo ADAMEE et ses compositions originales engagées !
Restauration : Food truck sur place !"
Ma réponse :
Bonjour,
Bien reçu votre message.
Je ne serai pas présent à ce concert.
Le mot "engagé" n'est pas approprié : ce n'est pas de l'engagement, mai…
ILS APPELLENT ÇA UN "FAIT DIVERS" 🤯
Les professeurs Jean-Bernard Fourtillan et Henri Joyeux ont été condamnés pour "essais sauvages" réalisés en 2018 et 2019.
Le prof. Jean-Bernard Fourtillan, docteur en pharmacie et co-réalisateur de la vidéo "Alerte Vaccin" et le prof. Henri Joyeux ont été condamnés pour avoir soulagé des personnes atteintes d'Alzheimer et Parkinson, volontaires, avec des patchs à la Valentonine n…
L'opération Popeye s'est déroulée entre 1967 et 1972 durant la guerre du Vietnam.
Méthode et objectifs :
L'armée américaine a mené des épandages aériens de iodure d'argent pour provoquer des pluies artificielles (engendrant des inondations et des glissements de terrain) afin de prolonger la saison des moussons, enliser la piste Hô Chi Minh et ralentir le ravitaillement des troupes ennemies.
Portée scientifique et…
Chauffage au bois : les feux de cheminée à foyer ouvert désormais interdits dans 657 communes françaises
Depuis le début du mois de novembre, l'utilisation des cheminées à foyer ouvert est strictement interdite dans un nombre croissant de communes.
Une mesure environnementale forte, motivée par la lutte contre la pollution aux particules fines, qui sème toutefois l'incompréhension et la colère chez de nombreux pro…
L'illusion de l'objectivité : quand l'IA choisit le confort de la complaisance
Showing the 12 most recent of 227 posts we hold for @lesloisacreesdelanature. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @lesloisacreesdelanature as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
6 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
18 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Allez vous voter aux présidentielles ?
Voter c'est-à-dire signer le registre que vous votiez nul blanc ou ce que vous voulez.
Oui6%
Non64%
Je ne sais pas12%
Je préfère ne pas me prononcer2%
Je vote seulement au premier tour4%
Je vote au deux tours6%
Je milite pour le vote0%
Je milite pour l'abstention9%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 227 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Bouquins & Culture @livres_2020 · 51,771 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 25 August 2026
MUSIQUE BOX @MusiqueBoxFr · 36,012 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 30 August 2026
• 𝙇𝙀𝙎 𝙑𝙄𝘿𝙀́𝙊𝙎 𝘿𝙐 𝙉𝙀𝙏 ✍️ @gags_rires · 39,686 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 29 August 2026
FUITES de LIVRES @PARTAGESdeLIVRES · 48,802 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 26 August 2026
LIVRES EN PDF 📚 @deslivresenpdf · 89,747 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 17 August 2026
Formations et livres @formationsetlivres · 22,861 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 23 September 2026
📚Bibliothèques des Livres Chrétiens En PDF✔ @strategiebasedone · 21,819 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 23 September 2026
Michel Dogna Officiel @micheldognaofficiel · 21,899 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 September 2026
TRACE AFRICA🎵✨ @afrikaZik · 21,322 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 23 September 2026
Bibliothèque @EpubFR @Bibliotheque_EpubFR · 53,467 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 25 August 2026
La Vérité Diffusée @VeriteDiffusee · 73,231 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Les Lois Sacrées de la Nature” (@lesloisacreesdelanature), 13,869 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lesloisacreesdelanature.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
