Channel
@ComteXavierCharles
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
317subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001781356201 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ComteXavierCharles |
| Description | Là où est le mensonge, que je mette la Vérité. Là où est la haine que je mette l amour. Saint François |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ComteXavierCharles |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 317 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 317 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (30 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 581 |
| Reactions total | 32 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
32 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 8 | 25.0% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 15.6% | |
| 😈 | 5 | 15.6% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 12.5% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 9.38% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 9.38% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 3.13% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 3.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ils ont menti sur tout. Ils mentent sur tout. Ils mentiront sur tout. Quand ils contrôlaient tout le flux informationnel, ça passait. Maintenant que NOUS contrôlons les réseaux, ils veulent les censurer. C'est aussi con que ça. Et c'est la preuve qu'ils mentent... https://t.me/aubontouite_francais
👏4
https://t.me/aubontouite_francais/21482
🤬2
Dans Hunger Games vous étiez avec la résistance Dans Star Wars vous étiez avec la résistance Dans Matrix vous étiez avec la résistance Dans Divergent vous étiez avec la résistance Dans V pour Vendetta vous étiez avec la résistance Quand c'est une fiction vous comprenez Quand c'est réel vous refusez de voir C'est dingue ! https://t.me/aubontouite_francais
👌4
Hier, à Bordeaux, la Gironde brûle toujours. Pourtant, le préfet envoie quand même six voitures de police pour le spectacle de Dieudonné contre les pédocriminels..... Alors que des habitants ont besoin d'aide pour évacuer certaines zones. La puissance des censeurs de Rothschild et des pédos d'Epstein passe-t-elle au-dessus de la sécurité des Français ? @la_nouvelle_france
🤬4😈1
Ils sont accompagnés de permis de construire pour deux postes de livraison et neuf postes de transformation. En tout, le parc pourra couvrir 120 ha avec 220 000 panneaux d’un seul tenant.A la lisière de cette vaste installation se trouvent des vignes en AOC Corbières au Domaine Le Grand Crès. https://les5duvin.wordpress.com/2023/08/28/laoc-corbieres-est-elle-menacee-par-le-photovoltaique/ 🤳 Incendie dans l’Aude : les…
🤬1😈1
COMMUNIQUÉ DE PIERRE BARNERIAS - Partie 1 - 16 juin 2026 "Fin de parcours et mise au point Après 36 années de journalisme, j’ai fait le choix de mettre un terme à cette activité. Cette décision marque la fin d’un long parcours professionnel. Mais avant de tourner définitivement cette page, il m’apparaît indispensable d’apporter plusieurs précisions sur des événements qui ont profondément marqué ma vie publique depu…
🙏3❤1
Ils nous ont dit que c'était une "théorie du complot" Maintenant, les images obtenues au microscope sont disponibles. - Des milliards de nanoparticules d'oxyde de graphène. - Des structures s'assemblant d'elles-mêmes découvertes à l'intérieur des vaccins COVID. - Pas moins de 55 substances non déclarées dont certaines sont réputées mortelles. Nous sommes face à une organisation qui a permis de commettre des crim…
🤬1😈1
🔴 Ceuta : une crise migratoire aux enjeux stratégiques Les quelques 60 000 migrants qui ont déferlés sur Ceuta entre le 30 et le 31 juillet ont été renvoyés en quasi-totalité au Maroc, en 48 heures, grâce à la coopération des autorités locales. Si le terme "vague migratoire" a été de mise dans les medias, les faits vont davantage dans le sens d'une opération internationale bien orchestrée, potentiellement liée à des …
🔥1
Je vous partage le guide très bien fait par un des abonnée 👏👏👏 Petit guide d'anonymat (tout n'est pas dispo pour ceux utilisant des appareils Apple) : Copiez ce message et enregistrez-le pour ne pas le perdre 🙂 Navigateur : Remplace Chrome - Cromite (technique) - Brave Remplace Firefox - Mullvad Browser - LibreWolf Moteur de recherche : Remplace Google - Searx (technique) - DuckDuckGo - Startpage VPN (clairemen…
❤2👍1
🏔 Le mont Meru : la montagne au centre du monde Depuis des milliers d'années, plusieurs traditions asiatiques évoquent une montagne sacrée qui se dresserait au centre de l'univers : le mont Meru. Dans l'hindouisme, le bouddhisme et le jaïnisme, le mont Meru n'est pas une simple montagne. Il est décrit comme l'axe du monde, le point où se rejoignent le ciel, la Terre et les royaumes divins. Les dieux y résident, et l…
CEUTA SOUS LA LOI DE LA JUNGLE : LES MAGASINS PILLÉS, LES HABITANTS TERRORISÉS En 48 heures, près de 60 000 migrants ont submergé Ceuta, enclave espagnole de 84 000 habitants. Commerces fermés à double tour, supermarchés assiégés, appartements occupés de force, policiers débordés. Les vidéos circulent : files d’attente monstrueuses devant les rares enseignes encore ouvertes, tentatives de sauts de barrières, scènes…
🤔1😈1
https://youtu.be/3AeNlKebHng?is=xT3KgIzZxfPMue0D
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ComteXavierCharles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Comte XC” (@ComteXavierCharles), 317 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ComteXavierCharles.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.